There has been only one F-35 loss out of the 350 or so built in the last 12 years with no deaths. Not a bad record all considered, bearing in mind the conditions some F-35s fly in. I can think of some other aircraft which have a much worse record.
The problem is, India will never be able to purchase the Su-57 as cheaply as they could buy the Su-30MKI, so the IAF may not receive all that many new aircraft – first batch of Su-57 probably won’t number more than 50 or sixty.
it’s unfortunate that we now no longer have a good source for various news simply because Spudman got overly sensitive
Spudman never asked Tango to leave?
Surely the jet-engined aircraft would just stay high and come out of the sun.
Much aerial warfare happens at night time surely? Most of Israel’s airstrikes against Syria are carried out at night I believe.
thanks for replying
what ! so su-27 in 1986-1990 period had a radar and was capable of using SARH missiles ?
but Ive read on other forums that su-27 had the same air to air capability as a F-16A armed with IR homing missiles only and could not use any SARH missiles till 1990
But just because you read it on a forum doesn’t mean you have to believe it, does it?
It’s said that the Yak-28 never received state certification at all – all those hundreds of aircraft flying in full military service during the Cold war were essentially illegal…
The characteristics of the radar is only one of the factors affecting the outcome of the air battle. And this factor is not the most significant. I believe that the total combat effectiveness will change slightly
Sensors such as radar have played a key role in air-to-air warfare in the last 50 years or so, not to forget EW and ECM equipment as well. Type of missile is also important – that F-16 is typically carrying AIM-120C5 or C7, plus AIM-9X or Python 4, 5 – what sort of missiles are the Chinese/Pakistani aircraft carrying?
In that case, why does he need a steel structure?
The maximum speed of 3000 km / h, M = 2.83
Cruising speed is 2500 km / h, M = 2.35 (up to 15 minutes)
MiG-31 has less steel than MiG-25 – a lot more aluminium http://www.airbase.ru/sb/russia/miko…31/index-t.htm
I know the MiG-31 can reach mach 2.83 if it really had – but it is limited to mach 2.35 like a lot of other aircraft.
The MiG-31 is capable of developing a speed of 3000 km / h with four R-33 missiles, this is precisely known. I think that R-73 or R-77 under the wing will not prevent him from doing the same
I thought the MiG-31 was limited to mach 2.35?
That’s a fairly heavy looking landing gear on Okhotnik – you’d think they were going to use it for carrier landings or something…
What is the point of taking delivery of an air defence system when it seems to be out of action a lot of the time.
Unless of course, the pantsir system was inoperative only because it had been so successful in the previous hours that it had already completely used up all its ammunition and missiles shooting down Israeli targets?
And i find the comparison between the production cycle of F-22 and Su-35S particular Weird..?
Why is it weird – I think it’s very relevant. People criticize the fact that only 188 F-22 were ever produced – but really that’s seems to be actually a good production figure. Which air arm around the world has more than 180+ Typhoons or Rafales? The only 2 combat aircraft to actually exceed F-22 production in the last 20 years (other than F-35) has been the Su-30MKI and presumably the J-11.
You don’t want to bring up old narrative here. The years before 2010, when T-50 made first flight, there was no end to the doom nd gloom regarding the program.
Behold some 12 prototypes later, and 10.000’s of flyinghours, weapons development, New type 30 engines in the air. Does this Narrative sound familiar?
A lot of nonsense has been written about the Su-57 F-35, F-22 etc, since before 2010 and long after. A lot of people were saying that the PAKFA would enter service by 2012 and there would 200+ airframes flying around by 2015, so go figure.
Here’s one from Sao Tome & Principe at least that what the caption read.
I presume it’s the same aircraft.
http://www.scoop.it/t/sao-tome-e-pr…to-de-sao-tome
[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”data-tempid”:”temp_259933_1547634514644_917″,”title”:”WpomuLvyVvg9aNkRMp8x8Tl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVvK0kTmF0xjctABnaLJIm9.jpg”}[/ATTACH]
I got a question was it true when the Su-35 1st came out people thought it would not be great in numbers in the early 2000s until later on they got produced in significant numbers? Was this a false or a true rumor regarding any old forum users here?
Depends on if you are comparing it with other aircraft production rates.
Compared to the F-35, Su-35 production is slow. Compared to other country’s aircraft production such as Japan’s F-2, India’s Tejas or even France’s Rafale, the Su-35 production rate doesn’t look too bad at all.
Don’t forget the capability to cruise at high mach for long range (~0.95+) and the inherent saving of fuel for not having to lit the burner (as much) before firing a missile (higher, faster cruise).
I don’t think high subsonic speeds are really relevant in an air-intercept mission? In any case I think all the euro-canards are capable of cruising at 0.9 mach, with lots of external stores too?