You won’t a cheap holiday in Sochi, as any Russian will tell you. They prefer to go (or used to go) to Sharm el-Sheikh or Hurghada.
You have no idea of the cost of living in Russia (it’s expensive). The estimate of the GDP and GNP in any country is exactly that – an estimate. Some countries do these estimates better than others, sure. but once you have calculated your country’s GDP, GNP, per capita, PPP, blah,blah,blah, what are you suppose to do with it? Do Russians have a higher social development index or standard of living than Portuguese?
Russia moved past Brazil, France and Germany (!) recently in the WB PPP charts. It is also now classified as a high-income country and it overtook Portugal in terms of GDP/c. Which is funny because it is exactly what Putin promised he/Russia would achieve in ten years, back in 2003. That is, double the GDP and overtake Portugal in per capita terms (the two leading catchphrases, догнать Португалию and удвоить ВВП). :p
The IMF and CIA data commonly quoted is actually less up to date than the WB data on these things, as they use older price surveys (2005 IIRC) as the basis for their calculations whereas the current WB report is based on 2008 surveys. This winter (December), the ICP will release more up to date data for them to use so the IMF report of April 2014 will see some significant jumps. But that aside, it is now a fact that the Russian Federation is Europe’s largest economy and that their per capita figures are rapidly approaching Western levels. It is right now at 47% of the US total for instance, which is a GDP/c level that Soviet Union never came close to.
Some of the facts you have presented are misleading if not completely wrong – Russia does not have the largest economy in Europe at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
R-73M2
Does such a designation exist officially?
…the two missiles are quite similar parameters as the IIR seeker 2 are capable of all-aspects.
Do the latest versions of the R-73 have an imaging IR seeker – or is it still a 2-colour seeker? Might that make a difference in performance?
A block 52+ is not junk, as Fedaykin explained, it will be as modern a ground attack aircraft in the region as can be expected until, perhaps Israel take delivery of their F-35s in a few years time. I dare say the Block 52+ is just as advanced as the Saudi and Israeli F-15E variants.
Bear in mind that the F-35 was from the very beginning designed firstly as a striker – the Typhoon, as an air-to-air fighter. So you could well convince me that the Typhoon still has the advantage, flight performance wise, in the ‘QRA’ interception role. But that doesn’t mean that the F-35 is some how useless or a slouch in this role either – it has the range, performance (for most of the flight profile at least), avionics and armament for the job, at least.
Ok, but even in the air-to-air role the Typhoon still has to carry those ‘wet bags’ for a significant proportion of the interception mission. who’s to say the F-35 doesn’t have the performance advantage till then?
Not so much need to be discreet when you can plonk JASSMs from long-range.
Sure, it’s not ‘sustainable’, but then neither is any Australian warfighting scenario involving F-35s (and a handful of tankers). The difference is the P-8 brings with it a host of other valued capabilities in the naval ISR realm.
All that could apply to any tactical fighter/striker.
F-35 … well, it can launch AMRAAMs I guess. But then so can Super Hornet.
I doubt if it would be difficult to wire a P-8 for AMRAAM – didn’t the P-3 and the Nimrod carry Sidewinder? Has the P-8’s main search radar got any air-to-air modes?
F-35 might be just a little bit more discreet and less vulnerable than a Boeing 737 airframe…
Here is the few hard data we have about Typhoon:
Brakes-off to supersonic: under 30 s
Brakes-off to Mach 1.6: under 150 s (incl. climb to 36k ft)
Does figures match a fully armed Typhoon with 2 2,000 pounder bombs, a pair of missiles and a pair of external fuel tanks?
Aren’t there allready two airframe for static purpose?
Yes, I thought there was. I would have also thought that it’s a bit late in the T-50’s flight test programme to still be carrying out RCS tests on static airframes – you know, those tests done outside on a test range with the airframe bolted on top of a huge pole. Surely such tests have to be successfully completed before the expensive flight test programme can begin?
two static models?
I’ll bite (smart аrse answer).
6-й образец будет нелётным (то-ли испытания ЭПР, то-ли прочностные испытания).
“То-ли…то-ли ‘Maybe…maybe’
То-ли…то-ли implies an element of conjecture:”
Wade, Terence, A Comprehensive Russian Grammar, “The Conjunction,” pp 494.
So I think it means: “6th (airframe) example will be non-flying (perhaps either for RCS testing or for static testing)”.
I wouldn’t even call the J-20 an ugly aircraft, although it’s certainly a cumbersome looking beast. The Chinese probably don’t even want to export it?
Have to agree. This is by far the most promising design that ever came from China, IMHO.
And it looks like a scaled down F-22.