dark light

Levsha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 2,665 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2299872
    Levsha
    Participant

    Not everything Russian is bought because it is “affordable” and “cheap”.

    The INS Vikramaditya was supposed to have been…:D

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #15 #2300221
    Levsha
    Participant

    Is that a Kenyan Mi-17 airlifting the wounded? [00:39-00:48]
    So far I have only seen them in desert/tan camo.

    It’s also doing a rolling take off – is that common for the Mil?

    You wouldn’t do it in a Huey…;)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2300448
    Levsha
    Participant

    An-124 production will be higher in future than C-17 once new engines/avionics are certified. There is big demand for its 150 tons version.
    $300m price 11000km range with 150 ton payload.
    http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/2012-07-09/russia-ukraine-pact-set-put-ruslan-heavylifter-back-production

    According to the link:

    The Russian government intends to seal its support for the revived program with a defense ministry order for 10 of the new-build aircraft and a commitment to pay for 22 in-service Ruslans to be overhauled and refitted. On top of this, commercial airlines Volga-Dnepr and Polet have indicated an intention to buy, respectively, 40 and six An-124s.

    It’s a lot of Ruslans – we’ll see…

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2300450
    Levsha
    Participant

    and goal is to have “25 combat ready An-124s by 2020”.

    Are you referring to the RuAF? I wouldn’t be surprised if they will have 25 “combat ready” An-124s by 2020 – that’s exactly how many airframes they have now, flying and non-flying – they don’t need to build anymore, do they?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2300464
    Levsha
    Participant

    An-124 production will be higher in future than C-17 once new engines/avionics are certified. There is big demand for its 150 tons version.
    $300m price 11000km range with 150 ton payload.

    Why do people keep banging on about restarting production of the An-124? According to this list, almost half of all An-124 airframes in existance are in “на хранении” (storage). Why don’t they just simply refurbish/quick lick of paint some of these idle planes?

    http://russianplanes.net/planelist/Antonov/An-124

    Mind you, some of the Antonovs might be beyond all hope of recovery, such as these ones?

    http://russianplanes.net/id87308

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2300495
    Levsha
    Participant

    Also, this deal, coupled with the Libyan request for Russian help servicing equipment shows that nations don’t “hold grudges” against “supporters” of previous regimes. If there is possibility of economic or military cooperation, realpolitik kicks in.

    If the new regimes were to “hold grudges” on those countries which supported the old regimes – I’d say countries like the USA, Britain, France, and maybe even Russia wouldn’t have a friend left in the world… :confused:

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2300588
    Levsha
    Participant

    Iraq may buy Mi-28N.

    Russia to sign $5-billion defense contract with Iraq

    The one and only “Pravda” (try reading some of the featured articles to the left of the text). The “Truth” indeed…:D

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2300786
    Levsha
    Participant

    There is not much chance of A400m profitability to EADS due to slow induction and production rates.

    Would you like to compare EADS turnover and profits with Aviastar’s?:confused:

    It will be drag on EADS for ever. infact production line will be closed sooner due to slow production rates.

    You must be a clairvoyant – a load of crystal balls…:rolleyes:

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2300802
    Levsha
    Participant

    well the Il-96 was also quite cheaper than any Airbus/Boeing equivalent and look what happened to its sales.

    The A400M has more orders on its books than the Il-476 has it not?

    in reply to: list of combat aircraft flight cost per hour #2301737
    Levsha
    Participant

    From August 2011.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2011/08/exclusive-us-air-force-combat.html

    (2010 data)
    A-10A: 24,000
    F-15C: 36,633
    F-15E: 28,639
    F-16C: 16,087

    B-1B: 63,215
    B-2A: 135,182
    B-52H: 72,793

    C-130H: 18,546
    C-130J: 14,669
    C-17A: 17,998
    C-5B: 49,060

    Costs for the A-10 more expensive than for the F-16C? That’s a surprise, the extra motor must make a big difference?

    in reply to: AH-64 Vs Air-Defence #2302466
    Levsha
    Participant

    Exactly.

    45,000 T-34s were destroyed in WWII – but nobody ever said that it was “known to be obsolete to defenses”.

    in reply to: AH-64 Vs Air-Defence #2302471
    Levsha
    Participant

    If the Apache was replaced with any other modern helo, in the context that they were used, I suspect they would also be “the most successful” strike aircraft.

    You could say the same about the T-34 tank in WWII.
    Give credit where it’s due.

    in reply to: AH-64 Vs Air-Defence #2302856
    Levsha
    Participant

    Valuable thoughts and advices. I read your topic with great interest.

    Me too. The AH-64 is probably the world’s most successful strike/attack aircraft (either fixed wing or rotary) of the last 25 years.:cool:

    in reply to: AH-64 Vs Air-Defence #2303108
    Levsha
    Participant

    SA-8? TOR M1?

    Didn’t an Iraqi farmer manage to shoot one down with a .303 Lee Enfield back in 2003?

    No, he didn’t – just one of Saddam’s News agency’s better fairy tales.

    Its basically about a highly prized asset like AH-64 & its cost-effectiveness in a competent battlefield. AH-64s battlefield experience till now have been without any strong opponents which is not going to be the case when it is employed against Pakistan or China or against Russia by NATO.

    How do you think India’s newly developed light combat helicopter will fare against Pakistani and Chinese air defences?

    in reply to: Current MiG-29 operators who are intending to retire soon #2304421
    Levsha
    Participant

    The F-16 in Italian AF service was only an interim, temporary measure…

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 2,665 total)