I thought the fast-packs can be removed, can’t they?
Regarding dog fighting, who’s got the better missile, HMD, HUD, etc…?
F-16.net is an excellent site, don’t know why people keep slagging it off?:confused:
Mpkkk.net – who are they, do you mean military photos? Another excellent site – great pics…:cool:
Might take a while because there is no operational F35 for the time being 😀
Nic
I’m not sure there are that many passive radar systems around either?
I’ll believe it when they can track an F-35 at tactically useful ranges.
Spud, are you a member of the “stealth-mafia”?:D
Doesn’t this just mean that countries operating Stealth Aircraft will target civilian TV and Radio stations in the first wave of a strike?
Yes it will, and these are transmitters which may be, for the most part, undefended and whose locations are already well known.
The article doesn’t really tell us how the system works or just how effective it really is, but surely a low RCS aircraft will be as difficult to detect using such a passive system as it is using normal AD radar systems anyway? Radio beams are radio beams, regardless what type of transmitter is broadcasting them?
What do you exactly mean? The R-73 should have a max range of 30km while the R-27T should have double that range.
But, then again, that was a usual combo for Fulcrums back in the day(2 R-27R + 4 R-73).
How does the IR seeker achieve lock-on at 60km – how sensitive can it be?
That’s unfortunately a question for martinez, I have only seen few pictures of Slovak MiG-29 armed with an R-27 that is why I assume they surely still have some. Interestingly, they always are R-27R1, never any IR guided R-27Ts.
That’s just the photo I need, and it looks recent enough too.
Maybe the R-27T doesn’t have a range much greater than the R-73 to justify its existence?
And no, Slovak MiG-29s are not likely to be phased out anytime soon. A dozen birds got upgraded to AS/UBS standard (TACAN, VOR/ILS, IFF bird slicers and MiG-29SM type cockpit) and these are the backbone of the fleet now. Slovakia urgently needs tactical transports (C-27J..) to replace An-26s, new fighters have lower priority.
I am curious on the status of R-27 on Slovak MiG-29 – are they carried much, any test firings?
According to the 32 page Soviet Air Force supplementary air combat manual called Aide-Memoire for the MiG-23 Pilot on Air Combat vs F-15A, F-I6A, F-4E and Kfir C.2, the F-4 in question is F-4E. Same manual also claims MLD radar performance equal to F-16A
Well we’ve heard it from the horse’s mouth then – I wonder if the horse ever saw an F4E (or operated its radar)…?
Inferior in turn and agility yes but the MiG-23MLD had a superior radar, better acceleration, and better landing and handling characteristics. The N008E Sapfir-23MLAE-2 was superior (either in range or ability to look down or shoot down) than the F-4’s radar and even the early F-16’s radar, under nose under-nose TP-26-Sh IRST. Based on ACIG info, the Syrians prefer using the 23 over the 29 for interception duties.
Which F-4 had inferior radar (there were many types of F-4)?
Although I can imagine that the MiG-23 might be a better air defence, intercept aircraft than the 29 – if I can believe that the MiG-23 had significantly better range and endurance than the MiG-29?:confused:
Incidently, they have never actually launched missiles from the Su-47 weapons bay, have they? The bays have no trapeze launch racks or anything like that? I have never seen photos of a missile launch from the Su-47.
In this now famous picture, it has one bay, seems to be the same size as the pak-fa bay, but this bay included a bulge on the fueselage
on the other hand drawings of the su-47 pre bulge show something that looks like it had 2 side by side bays. did the 47 really have 2 bays back then?
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Which do you trust more: actual real photos (of which there are dozens of) of the aircraft with its bay doors open, or a crappy line drawing?:confused:
I didn’t know that the Islamic Republic of Iran was a “Western” country – but I’m sure that country also used its “supports” when they could.
But let’s not upset mrmalaya any further.
Is there any campaign (all of which anyway were 3rd rate powers) in which your “mighty” jets have ventured out alone?? :rolleyes:
What do you mean by “alone.” Israeli F-15s against Syria, Iranian F-14s against Iraq?
Yeah sure, they don’t miss any oportunity to try to put the russians in a bad light innit?
You sound very paranoid…