1500km/hr is still an impressive cruising speed for any combat aircraft…
You’ve never been to MAKS, have you? Every sort, is the answer!
Ha, ha… been to MAKS in 2004, 2005, 2007. Thinking about appropriate wear to an airshow reminded me of an incident in 2005 while I was waiting outside the security barriers and metal detectors to get into MAKS with two, British, friends. In front of us in the queue was a girl wearing some sort of gold lame, shoulderless, sleeveless top (something you might see on a cabaret performer). To quote the British (female) response: “yeah, you would wear something like that to an airshow, wouldn’t you”.
But it makes no difference to me what anyone wears to an airshow…
No, it`s bcs the Mig-21MF service life was prescribed 2500fh/30y compared to Mig-23ML 1500fh/17years.
I don’t see how that makes any difference. Surely, if a country’s air arm wanted to extend the life of their MiG-23s they would have. I wonder what is the typical airframe life of the Indian AF MiG-27 presently serving?
I dare say, many countries got rid of the MiG-23 because of its bad safety record?
Anyway which aircraft today is not complicated and prone to serviceability issues, perhaps the F-22 craptor, the mother of all maintenance nightmares???
Seeing as we are talking about MiGs, why not use the MiG-31’s service and maintenance record instead?:rolleyes:
makes me sad about Lavochkin’s end in the fighter industry, I thought La-15 was decent.
Il-2, why not? not a fighter, but it was the A-10 of its time.
Oh you are correct there, absolutely not a fighter – too slow and cumbersome.
but it was the A-10 of its time.
But the Shturmovik didn’t carry any stand-off missiles…
La-5 and La-7 are the Soviet WW2 aircraft I most admire – the Il-2, the least.
I like the An-72s nickname. Cheburashka.
…and his friend the Mi-24 (Krokodil).:D
What sort of woman wears high heels at an air show?:p
who’s complaining about these aircraft?
After all, they are completely new aircraft, there might be teething problems…
The French have already used their Tigres in Afghanistan.
Yep, both the products of Eurotrash fatcats
.
Brilliant political-industrial analysis.:rolleyes:
What’s the serviceability rate of Typhoon/Rafale/Gripen? Or of MiG-31BM, Su-27SM?
And what is the definition of “serviceability” from one country to another anyway, how is it measured?
Also, Mirage2000 some significant advantages such as payload, combat radius, potantiel of avionics etc….
Are you sure about the avionics?
How about each aircraft’s radar (India was not over pleased with the M2000 radar, allegedly)?
You can read the specs on the website below – supposed to be better than the F-16’s radar set…
http://www.f20a.com/f20radar.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_AN/APG-67
Indeed the Tu-95 is more then adequate as a ALCM/CALCM platform, considering how new the airframes are (they were all built in the 80s and early 90s) they should remain in role for many years to come.
Indeed the Tu-95 is still more than adequate in the ALCM launcher role. It fact, it poses the question, why does the RuAF persist in keeping the Tu-160 in service? Why the unnecessary duplication – or is there something the Tu-160 can do that the BEAR can’t?
Moscow grows on you, I am very fond of the place and with Russia in general, but the city is expensive.
But hey! I’m from Ireland! I’m used to paying through the frigging nose for everything.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
On some of the ‘better’ nights in Moscow town, I sometimes would start developing ‘vision’ problems!:D
Are you still in Moscow, Distiller?
Levsha:
Sounds like its for Su-33s alone, also mentioned 100 landings, and 20 mock-battles/interceptions.
Also I’ve been meaning to ask, whats with the name? Levsha, as in Russian, or something else?
BA degree in Russian Studies, spend over 5 years of my life in Russia, I still do some work in translating from Russian to English. When I was choosing my “klichka” for this forum 6 years back I was, at that time, reading the story of “Levsha, The Tale of Cross-eyed Lefty from Tula and the Steel Flea”. It’s a tale which I found very interesting and amusing – hence, I borrowed the name…
(but I am not left-handed)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levsha
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%88%D0%B0_(%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B7)
Yes, i believe F-35 will eventually be cheaper than both EF & Rafale in total cost
Yes, singled-engined aircraft usually cheaper to buy and operate compared to their twin-engined equivalents.