dark light

Levsha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,411 through 1,425 (of 2,665 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2367482
    Levsha
    Participant

    ELP, I’m not sure your chart is very relevant for most of the F-35’s attack profiles anyway. why would the F-35 be doing Mach 0.8 while cruising to the target, if it could be crusing at mach 1.2 instead? How long would it take a MiG-29 or J-10 to catch up on a F-35 flying at M1.2 and 40,000 ft+ in a tail chase anyway?

    in reply to: F-35, third restructure in three years #2367490
    Levsha
    Participant

    Nah… They should buy the Su-35.

    That would really put the cat among the pigeons! :diablo: 😀

    Yeah, let Ukraine buy the F/A-18E:diablo:

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368310
    Levsha
    Participant

    Aerodynamically:
    Sustained turn rate is shocking (was an early snapshot not quoted as inferior to that great dogfighter… the F-4).
    High speed drag is also poor; not a complete killer, but not good if, like Japan (or Canada), you will want to use the thing as an interceptor to stop inbounds from attacking your shipping/infrastructure.

    To be honest I don’t keep up with the very latest on the F-35.

    But who knows all this information for a fact? Who has determined the F-35’s ‘sustained turn rate’, and how – by watching youtube videos? Has Lockheed or the US DoD made any statements on it yet?

    A lot of the criticism of the F-35 seems to me like a lot of speculation and conjecture – but maybe there are wiser people on the Key forums?:confused:

    in reply to: F-35 can push down PAK-FA and J-20 type? #2368313
    Levsha
    Participant

    All three aircraft are very early in their development stages so such questions are largely debatable on many levels.

    I think the F-35 is just a little bit more ahead than the other pair in testing.

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368315
    Levsha
    Participant

    JSF has fundamental problems with the airframe (and indeed the aerodynamic platform); these are serious issues that none of the Gripen/Eurofighter and Rafale have.

    What are the fundamental problems with the airframe of the F-35 – she looks like a nimble little ****** to me…

    in reply to: U.S. Navy helicopters getting infrared-seeking rockets #1794808
    Levsha
    Participant

    It wouldn’t be the first helicopter launched infra-red seeking “rocket” in USN service – what about AGM-119 Penguin, still in service?

    in reply to: Azerbaijan Air Force #2368603
    Levsha
    Participant

    So I reccon that thing is probbably even more powerful than the famed chain-gun of the Appaches?

    It is a more powerful round than that fired from the Apache’s M230. Here’s a photo for comparison (2A42 round on far left, of course):

    Mi-24Ps twin 30mm puts them both to shame.

    But that was a fixed forward-firing mounting, a temporary measure.

    in reply to: Azerbaijan Air Force #2368632
    Levsha
    Participant

    There were problems with the recoil of the 2A42 on the Mi-28 in the early days of the helicopter’s development, but they seem to be resolved now.

    The 2A42 is a massive gun to be fitting on a helicopter, especially if you are trying to mount it on a nose mounted rotating turret. It’s probably only possible to fit it on a helicopter that was initially designed to take it in the first place – just as the Fairchild A-10 literally had to be designed around the its 30mm revolver cannon.

    The Gsh-23 mm gun should be adequate enough for the Mi-35M – I would be more interested in the sighting and targeting systems available for it, and its gyro-stabilised mounting.

    in reply to: Draken vs F-104 #2368648
    Levsha
    Participant

    Sens. Did you not once say that the F-5 (forget which variant) actually had a faster climb rate to 30,000 feet than the MiG-21?

    in reply to: Draken vs F-104 #2368677
    Levsha
    Participant

    Arquebus,

    Don’t contradict alphaKilo too much on flying the F-104…:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Algerian MiG-25RBSh #2368678
    Levsha
    Participant
    Levsha
    Participant

    What happened to the Russian AF order for the French Damocles designator pod? Wasn’t it supposed to have gone into production in Russia at some stage?

    in reply to: Draken vs F-104 #2368795
    Levsha
    Participant

    Dohhh…:o:o (Soviet/Russian aircraft designation “soup” again).

    in reply to: Draken vs F-104 #2368799
    Levsha
    Participant

    You’re right, I was thinking of Indian air force MiG-21PF (which had to have an external gun pod fitted)…:o

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2368808
    Levsha
    Participant

    So if the Boeing deal goes through, the F-15 will have been in production for up to 40 years – has there been any other combat aircraft that has been produced for so long? Maybe MiG-21/J-7?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,411 through 1,425 (of 2,665 total)