Well not at all John, great insight into problem solving , external cargo reminds me of the Papua New Guinea Junkers in the 30s which carried cranes and other heavy kit for the gold fields. They just removed the cabin roof and the crane stuck into the fresh air!
well Chevpol, there are a number of UK airfields where taxiways cross roads some of which are public, it is also common place for busy roads on bases to cross taxiways and runways controlled by lights. I have seen engine run ups where roads stayed open behind and you took your chances. There are smaller GA airfields in the Uk where approach ..climb outs are over public roads with no traffic control, you just have to take care on approach in case of double deckers etc.
also see recent photos here http://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=81540
More info here….http://www.airfields-freeman.com/AZ/Airfields_AZ_N.htm
according to this site alot of the buildings in the link have now gone…
Glad my 20 minutes on goggle was not wasted…. a shame my copy of Air Britains Squadrons of the RAF was in the loft, would have been easier…
Suggest buying a back issue number 10…great then and now photo comparisions https://www.afterthebattle.com/magazine/issues1-25.html
Thank you Moggy…sort of puts things into perspective for those of us who might be inclined to moan about minor problems….
203 squadron seems to have been at these locations, note that the list on the prop is not in year order……http://www.rafcommands.com/Ross/Coastal/203C.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._203_Squadron_RAF Among the numerous types of aircraft it was equipped with were the Nieuport 17, Nieuport 21, and Sopwith Pup, followed later by the Sopwith Camel.
does it matter which one? good news that the market is strong enough to support another recovery, I see this trend increasing, there was a time 30 years ago when wrecks were almost ignored and left to history bods and souvenir hunters.
Public access? I understood there was access to the Bof B flight . https://www.lincolnshire.gov.uk/heritage-and-tourism/battle-of-britain-memorial-flight/
well..the simplest explanation is that the insurance premiums rose as the airframe aged, at a certain point the risk of parts falling onto a person or property became to much for the owners.
Unless the airfield is still to be used as an airfield ,as at Duxford, the movements areas are of no use to aviation preservation ,just areas of tarmac, concrete and grass. Once away from the perimiter this changes with possible use depending on funding and existing condition of buildings. Indeed the sheer scale of former military airfields produces more issues which need thought regarding use against decay. Certainly keep at least one building as a focus eg tower and some space around it as at Dumfries and if very fortunate you can bring back parts such as Elvington. ….Lincolnshire and nearby Notts is already served by existing museums and I cannot see the point of another.
Olly its Guy Black and a DH9 …http://www.aerovintage.co.uk/
Not really disregard,more a statement of fact, there are many airfields involved in bomber raids which resulted in lives lost and contributed to the effort. And other raids departed from airfields which were not preserved such as Skitten in Caithness where the Halifaxes started the longest glider towing raid to Norway and many crews and Telemark commandos were lost.