dark light

allan125

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 366 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FS2004 Hurricane Repaint! #249116
    allan125
    Participant

    Hurricane

    Hi Stieglitz – and a superb job you have made of it as well – cheers – Allan πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Hurricane info wanted! #1435141
    allan125
    Participant

    601 squadron crest

    Hi Guys – I don’t wish to be pedantic, but the crest is a post-war Royal Auxiliary Air Force one, not the wartime Auxiliary Air Force version. πŸ™‚

    The Royal Auxiliary Air Force (RAuxAF) owes its origin to Lord Trenchard’s vision of an elite corps of civilians who would serve their country in flying Squadrons in their spare time. Instituted by Order in Council on 9th October 1924, the first Auxiliary Air Force (AAF) Squadrons were formed the following year. By September 1939, there were 20 Flying Squadrons, equipped with a variety of operational aircraft, which included Hurricanes and Spitfires; there were also 47 Balloon Squadrons.

    These AAF Squadrons scored a number of notable successes before and during World War II: the flight over Mount Everest, the first German aircraft destroyed over British territorial waters – and over the mainland, the first U-boat to be destroyed with the aid of airborne radar, the first kill of a VI flying bomb; the first to be equipped with jet-powered aircraft, and the highest score of any British Night Fighter Squadron.

    In the Battle of Britain, the AAF provided 14 of the 62 Squadrons in Fighter Command’s Order of Battle and accounted for approximately 30% of the accredited enemy kills. The Balloon Squadrons also played their part, downing and deterring many hostile aircraft and were accredited with the destruction of 279 VI flying bombs. These achievements were honoured by the prefix Royal conferred by King George VI on 16 December 1947. No doubt the correct one is out there on the WWW – I have an Auxiliary Air Force connection as my late Mother was a WAAF at HQ Balloon Command in 1940 – cheers – Allan πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Arnhem 60+ #1437043
    allan125
    Participant

    Hi Moggie – Glad you had a good time – 60 years ago tomorrow (20th) my father was part of the advance party of 125 Wing to move into B.82 Grave/Keent, which had only just been liberated by the Americans a few days earlier, so I have a kinship with the area – ref your comment about the Glider Pilots “My only thought was that since none of them could be extracted from the Oosterbeek pocket particularly, did they take-up arms as foot soldiers and suffer from their lack of training in that role?” our glider pilots were, in the main, fully trained soldiers, unlike their American counterparts who were speedily evacuated ours formed up into their own units and took part in perimeter defence etc. Having said that RAF aircrew were also part of the Glider Pilots at the Rhine op. in March ’45 because of the heavy losses at Arnhem, but I don’t know if they had the same infantry training as the soldiers. Take a look at http://www.gliderpilotregiment.org.uk/ for more information. cheers – Allan

    in reply to: 'Incident No 50' 15th September 1940 #1438818
    allan125
    Participant

    John Sample

    bump

    Hi Geoff – as well as your bump we might as well have this website about John Sample to go with your excellent piece on his target. πŸ™‚
    http://www.johnsample.50megs.com/ – cheers – Allan

    in reply to: A question about He-100s #1438868
    allan125
    Participant

    Oh, THAT Spanish airspace. πŸ™‚

    Amazing how the Spanish want Gibraltar back as it’s on the Spanish mainland, but won’t let go of Spanish Morocco despite it being the other side of the Straits of Gibraltar isn’t it !!??

    in reply to: Spitfire IIa P7904 #1555206
    allan125
    Participant

    130 squadron – PJ-N

    Hi Mike – I have trawled all the way through FCL vol 1 from the period that 130 was formed until 31 Dec ’41 (into the V period) and, apart from Pickthorne/Bloyce on 21 August, can only find one other 130 loss – that being Sgt Cox on 31 December in Vb BL286. I know that FCL is not 100% accurate :rolleyes: , but unless someone has access to 130 squadron’s Forms 540/541 we will not get an “official” answer. I can understand Floods piece from STH about P8370 being marked SOC on 27/8/41 – that’s probably the date the squadron clerk filled in the card !! For example, my own 125 Wing research, of which 130 was part of in it’s XIV period, has found out that 453 RAAF squadron AM78’s show they swopped Spit’s with 129 squadron on 17 July 1943, but the actual changeover was on 28 June. Similarly when they swopped with 341 (French) squadron on 15 October ’43 they were not recorded until 3 November. What we all need to know is how genuine is the comment “…Dutch citizen who has provided information that P7904 was shot down by flak and crashed into the sea off the Dutch coast” – I am not doubting the person making the comment, but what proof have we that it happened to PJ-N? As a person with an interest in 130 (Punjab) squadron I hope an answer, which is out there, surfaces soon. πŸ™‚ cheers – Allan

    in reply to: Can you identify this ? #1555212
    allan125
    Participant

    And it looks better than Debbie McGee, However you look at it !!

    I have never seen her tied down on a lot of boxes so I have nothing to compare it with πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Can you identify this ? #1555246
    allan125
    Participant

    Isn’t this the trick where Paul Daniels pulls up a big curtain and swops it for Debbie McGee ?!! πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: RAF Bomber Command Daylight Raids #1555927
    allan125
    Participant

    Bomber Command Daylight Raids

    Hi Dave – take a look at this link about daylight raids -which mentions 150 Wing as escorts – and you should find it a very informative piece πŸ™‚ – http://www.rafcommands.com/dcforum/DCForumID6/5341.html#8

    Bomber Command did not form up like the 8th USAAF for its daylight raids –
    You will note that it says “The fighter escorts frequently had considerable problems providing effective cover to a stream and Ramrod 1403 was fairly typical. 150 Wing (19, 65 and 122 Sqdns) provided the escort.”Rendezvous was made according to plan with the bombers at 20,000 feet and the Wing up to 26,000 feet with 65 Sqdn towards the front, 122 Sqdn in the centre and 19 Sqdn towards the rear. The bombers were spread out in a stream some 20 miles long and five or six miles wide with the last group of Lancasters tailing along several miles behind the main gaggle.” – I have now looked at my cousins logbook, and his total operational hours were 60 hours 10 mins on day raids and 139 hours on night raids – broken down as 13 day raids and 20 night raids, which was probably typical of 5 Group during the period Aug ’44 – April ’45. One of his night raids being Dresden on 13 February 1945 where they were airborne for 9 hours 30 mins and the longest time airborne was on a Boxing Day 1944 raid to Munich where they were in the air for 10 hours 10 mins and had to land at Kelstern instead of their home base of Skellingthorpe. – cheers – Allan πŸ™‚

    in reply to: RAF Bomber Command Daylight Raids #1556042
    allan125
    Participant

    Daylight raids

    Dave – After D-Day Bomber Command made extensive heavy daylight raids in support of the Normandy Battlefield – also, as the armies moved further into europe they took part in more and more daylight raids with very large numbers taking part. In a lot of cases escorts were RAF Mustangs – one wing being 150, commanded by W/C “Bill” Loud. 150 had formerly operated Tempest V’s during the anti-V1 campaign. They flew to B.60 Grimbergen in late September 1944 and changed places with the Mustangs of 122 Wing. 122 Wing’s history stating – β€œEnd of an Epoch – On 28th September the three Mustang Squadrons returned to England, amidst general lamentations, to carry out escort duties to day-raiding Lancasters. 122 Squadron had been with the Wing since May 1943, 19 and 65 just three months less. In that time they had become an integral part of 122, and had achieved some magnificent results.” – I had a cousin serve a 33 op tour with 61 squadron (Lanc’s), between August ’44 and April ’45, so I will check his logbook, which is on CD, to see how many daylight op’s he flew if you like ? – hope this helps πŸ™‚ – Allan

    in reply to: 453 squadron #1586400
    allan125
    Participant

    453 squadron RAAF

    Do any of you guys know anything about
    RAAF Squadron 453, they were an Aussie
    oufit active at Arnhem, an Aussie mate of
    mine is interested………thanks Dave

    Hi Dave – what do you need πŸ™‚ – I have a lot of information about them – both pre, post and during their 125 Wing (Detling to Antwerp/Deurne) period.

    I also have their semi-official RAAF History “Defeat to Victory” which covers their formation to disbanding. – cheers – Allan πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Dutch Catalina flies again #1809334
    allan125
    Participant

    Nice registration πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Atlantic Glider Train – what was this? #1817796
    allan125
    Participant

    Atlantic Glider Train

    Hi Dave – take a look at – http://www.theplanpage.com/esp/tglider.htm – AS a weapon of war the glider has come of age. First successfully used by Germans in the invasion of Crete, these motorless carriers of men and munitions more recently figured prominently in the Allied conquest of Sicily.

    Towed to a point near their destination by large twin‑engine transports which likewise carry supplies and even paratroopers, the glider cuts free to make a stealthy approach. Virtues of the glider are numerous: it lands lightly in small space and when necessary even “crash lands” without serious damage to crew or cargo. It is inexpensively and quickly built, thus is expendable. Because of a β€œwhispering” approach, it provides a measure of surprise.

    Aside from the glider’s combat importance, it offers great new possibilities in air transport. In England recently a glider descended through the cloud ceiling to make a smooth, graceful landing on an airfield. Utilizing the “sky-train” technique it had just flown across the Atlantic. The glider was towed by a Douglas C-47 transport (similar to the commercial DC-3) and the 3,500 mile journey was completed in 28 hours. (See November, 1943, issue.)

    Recognizing its importance in aggressive warfare, the U.S. Navy has developed a unique and efficient glider; it is amphibious, landing either on land or water. As a troop transport it is capable of carrying twelve fully equipped men. Construction is entirely of plastic bonded plywood. These ships are built by Allied Aviation and Bristol Aero and, of course, performance data and specifications are restricted. – only the basics but more is probably out there on Google, but work calls !! πŸ˜‰ cheers – Allan πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Susannah York #1820718
    allan125
    Participant

    Make do with Page 3? πŸ˜‰

    I haven’t seen page 3 for ages πŸ˜€ – is Susannah on that ? πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Susannah York #1820751
    allan125
    Participant

    Rather dishonest for a start, also I think people like the memorabilia aspect of it too. πŸ™‚

    I didn’t say that I would :), but if Moggy gets outbid what is a man to do !!?? πŸ˜€

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 366 total)