Oops, my error.That should have been FK240 [not FR240]. Sorry about that. I’ll edit the original post to show the correct serial number.
I can’t explain the “Gremlin’s Grandpappy” aspect. The article is six pages long and that name appears twice, on the second and fifth pages.
On the subject of passenger seating or otherwise aboard ferrying Liberators, I have come across a 1944 article by Edward C. Bowyer that brings out the contrasting standards.
The article appeared in FLIGHT magazine for 25th May 1944 under the title, “Britain’s Overseas Air Services”. Mr Bowyer “is Chief of the Information Department, Society of British Aircraft Constructors”, a former journalist who had joined the SBAC in 1930 to organise its Information Department and had also held other senior SBAC posts in WWII. The article reports a 25,000 mile journey from early January 1944 to early February 1944. He travelled in several different aircraft types but two of the journeys were in Liberators.
The first of these was in Liberator FR240 EDIT; THIS WAS A TYPO – SHOULD BE ‘FK240’ (christened “Gremlin’s Grandpappy”) from West Africa to the Bahamas. “Eighteen passengers were on board. There were side seats in the aft portion of the fuselage, a few bunks in the bomb bay and a shelf – known as the Bridal Suite – above the bomb bay”. Mr Bowyer (the only civilian on board) was assigned the shelf, said to be the most ‘comfortable’ accommodation. As Mr Bowyer was behind schedule, Captain Williams had suggested they take the fastest route and Mr Bowyer had agreed. “My regret was to come later”, he wrote. I can’t repeat the circumstances, so will simply add another of Mr Bowyer’s comments: “My longest, fastest and most arduous flight since my first airline journey in 1921”.
The second of his Liberator flights was on board Liberator AL614 from Montreal to Prestwick. AL614 “had no seats[/I] and [I]the twelve passengers were accommodated on mattresses on the floor[/I]”. Passengers were “provided with oxygen masks, flying suits, flying helmets and gloves. Warm air was admitted through vents in the main bulkhead, but it was not circulated, with the result that the air at the top of the fuselage got very hot, while the temperature on the floor stayed below freezing point till late the following morning” (their having left Montreal at five-thirty in the afternoon). He says that it was difficult to sleep anyway, with the associated risk of kinking the oxygen tube and suffocating, and that condensation building up inside the mask trickled down and froze.
You may find the whole article of interest; it is available on-line.
Please thank Robert for his contributions, Matt. Soon after I had posted the photograph of the “MOVEMENTS BOARD” (Post # 42), I was unsure about the veracity of the information displayed. Robert has the same concerns.
And congratulations to Alan and Matt for establishing the location of the photograph of AL627 (post #80). Here’s another shot of AL627 but, this time, the location is given – Montreal:
Good luck on all fronts, Matt.
I look forward to the results of your enquiry, Matt.
Meanwhile, another puzzle for you – a shot of a Liberator, also said to be flying along the coast of Arran. This particular aircraft is ‘captioned’ as AL627. Once again, can you perhaps identify the precise location?
Thanks, again.
The photos were terrific, longshot. I already have the “Stockholm Run” book to which you refer.
I wasn’t aware, lazy8, of the ‘differences’ between Consolidated and BOAC that you describe.
I have located another copy of that MOVEMENTS BOARD photo. The quality is not great but it has slightly different visual qualities that make the top of the board clearer. You can’t see the column headings any better (perhaps worse, in fact) but a date is chalked on the top-left of the board. Again, it’s not too clear but the year is “42“. I hope that this image can be seen well enough to see that.
EDIT: Oh dear! It doesn’t seem possible to expand that image; I don’t know why. Perhaps you will have more luck. What I have done, however, is copy the image below on to a WORD document and then expand the image on that page. The “42” is clear and the date may be “19” but the month is not obvious.
.
Thank you, adrian/lazy8, for the additional and very useful information. Do you know when the’ mattresses on the floor’ arrangements ended and the fitted seats came in?
Thanks again, Matt, for the detailed aircraft history.
For ericmunk particularly (though others may be interested):
I attach a picture of a BOAC DC-3 at Lisbon. It is a cutting from a newspaper or magazine back in 1944. I didn’t ‘create’ the cutting but was given it, probably some 55 years ago. I don’t know who gave it to me and I don’t know from which publication it was removed (maybe AEROPLANE SPOTTER). The picture came stuck to a 5″ x 3″ record card and you can see the handwritten note on the front (“G-AGIP Douglas Dakota Mk.3“). The note continues on the reverse side, “Of BOAC at Lisbon Airport recently with D-ARPF of Deutsche Luft Hansa in the background” and, at the bottom, is written “14.12.44“. Whether that is the date the picture was taken or the date of publictaion, I don’t know but probably the latter.
G-AGIP was not one of the KLM DC-3s that escaped to Britain. You can tell quickly because the passenger door is on the port side, whereas KLM’s DC-3s had the passenger door on the starboard side – I have no idea where that comes from, so I hope I’m right. However, while G-AGIP was not an ex-KLM DC-3, D-ARPF was.
Thanks for the comments, all.
Trumper:
I’ve just finished reading “Ferry Command” by Don McVicar (to which someone earlier in this thread first directed me – thanks). It was a quick skate through, over a few nights, rather than a ‘study’ but he certainly didn’t relish the lack of comfort on the return from Prestwick. This was earlier than this photograph was taken and standards could have improved in that time.
Ericmunk:
Everything I’ve read about the North Atlantic ferry route mentions that the crews were made up of many nationalities. Five KLM DC-3s escaped to Britain at the start of WWII and were used on the Whitchurch – Lisbon service and, for that, I believe that any Dutch crewmen would have had to become BOAC staff – maybe even being issued with British passports – like the Norwegian crews that flew to Stockholm. I am less sure that it would have been a requirement for ‘flying’ Dutchmen on the North Atlantic ferry service.
Adrian/lazy8:
Further back along the fuselage, there appear to be cabin windows and overhead racks for bags, coats or whatever. The passengers do not appear to be prepared for cold conditions, either.
On the other hand, when some BOAC Liberators received their civilian marks, they were registered as 18-seater aircraft (presumably 9 seats along each side?). If the photograph of the interior was taken from the front-most seat, that would be about right.
Below, I show part of the registration certificate for Liberator II G-AHYE (AL529). I’ve chosen this one for no other reason than that it shows not only the “eighteen seater” note but also the “REDUCED TO PRODUCE” phrase, to which there is reference in earlier posts.
Thanks, Graham. ‘Produce’ used as in “to feed’ damaged aircraft – sounds possible to me.
Thanks, Duggy for the photograph – not one I’ve seen before but, then, I haven’t made any great study of the subject.
Here’s one I found recently. I believe it is from PICTURE POST which apparently carried a feature on the “2000th flight” at Prestwick, possibly in March 1945. The wording seemed to suggest to me (perhaps I picked up what it said wrongly) that it was the 2000th aircraft flying eastward but, given the numbers I’ve read elsewhere for eastbound deliveries, I assume that it was actually the 2000th Return Ferry Service flight. Does that sound right?
Anyway, I believe that this is the inside of a passenger-carrying Liberator:
I don’t know why but I thought “RTP” meant “Reduced To Parts” until I saw it written on the pdf for G-AHYE on the G-INFO website I would never have come up with “Reduced To Produce”, which is a strange turn of phrase indeed. “Produce”, as a noun, is something produced; ‘reduced to something that is produced’ makes no sense at all to me. Maybe it was a phrase dreamed up by a civil servant with a classics education and ‘produce’ has a classical root of which I am not aware. Can anyone produce an answer to this conundrum?
Thanks for the photograph, Duggy, and for the aircraft history, Matt.
A J Jackson’s “British Civil Aircraft 1919-59” said that it crashed at Prestwick on 13 November 1948 and was scrapped in December 1948. This was clearly a mistake (possible a misreading of a handwritten note) because G-INFO says it was withdrawn from the register on 28 February 1947, as Matt states. Jackson combined its fate with G-AHYE (c/n 27) which was indeed withdrawn on 13 December 1948 as “REDUCED TO PRODUCE“.
Meanwhile, here’s Consolidated’s factory in San Diego – in 1943, I think, when it was being extended.
This piece of silent video is apparently made up of the out-takes from a Pathé News item about the expansion of Prestwick Airport in 1944.
http://www.britishpathe.com/video/expansion-of-prestwick-airport
The notes do not mention Liberators but you do briefly see one being worked on in one of Scottish Aviation’s hangars – to me, it looks like one of the Return Ferry Service machines but perhaps someone here could confirm that or otherwise.
In one of the shots, you can see what appears to be a Coastal Command Liberator taxiing. There is also a couple in the background as a B-17 takes off and also perhaps in the background of some of the views from the control tower.
There are various other ‘period’ aircraft to be seen – B-17s parked, a Lancaster too, Daks and C-54s (still and moving), a Beaufighter flying low (presumably after take-off) and so on. The film lasts just over 3 minutes and is well worth watching. It can be viewed full screen, too.
It makes me wonder if the original Pathé News newsreel is still availble to view. Does anyone know?
Thank you, wieesso, for that link, not only the particular page you showed but also for some of the other pages on the site. I’ve barely skimmed the surface this morning but it is all been good so far.
Gander is the first place I ever set foot on North American soil (or, rather, concrete). It was in the mid-1960s, a student charter flight, an ex-Pan Am DC-7, an unplanned stop to re-fuel (caused by headwinds, I believe) and my memory of it is fairly limited. Nevertheless, I have an affection for the place and reading all these bits and pieces about Ferry Command and the Return Ferry Service has a certain resonance. Also, as well as visiting Prestwick Airport several times in my teens (my first night in Scotland was spent sleeping in an armchair in the old terminal building), I later lived quite close to the airport for a number of years.
Thanks, again.
FLIGHT magazine for 23 July 1942, which I have just seen on-line, has a six-page article entitled “Ferry Command Birthday”. The main photograph on the opening page has the same photograph that we have been discussing – the one with the MOVEMENTS BOARD in it. The photograph is captioned:
In the “operations room” of the main eastern terminal of the R.A.F. Atlantic Ferry Command
This confirms, to my satisfaction anyway, that the location is Prestwick. It also shows that the photograph must have been taken in 1941 or, more likely perhaps, in 1942. The magazine shows the photo reference number as CH 5542 (which might be a digit short) but previous photographs I have seen with “CH” prefixes have been from the Air Ministry.
The article has some photographs attributed to “Flight” magazine itself and here is one of them:
Thanks, TonyT. It was new to me and very interesting.