dark light

pjhydro

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032410
    pjhydro
    Participant

    2. Sounds like less ice, not more – and the NW passage is through Canadian waters. Not really our business.

    I think that is the idea, that the Russians will be using the Arctic region more, but as far as i’m concerned, it’s not our problem or business. The US, Canada and the Scandanavians are the ones with the problems.

    “…a quarrel in a far away country between people of whom we know nothing…..” how very Nevile of you both.

    1) Speaking as a person with some knowledge of this area, it will mean plenty more ice, broken pack ice, icebergs etc That means shipping is more likely to meet ice randomly, very dangerous.

    2) So British shipping and business interests will not be involved in any enterprises north and south of the respective polar circles? May as well apply the same arguement to the Indian Ocean and The Med….so no point having an RN now.

    The Arctic/Antarctic issues are going to be the next big game in town and it would seem a shame if we aren’t their to play our part.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032448
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Agreed. But C2 is a long way in the future.

    Thetis is an ice-strengthened arctic patrol specialist, a C3 with padding. I think a copy would be perfect for the South Atlantic (though Clyde is probably good enough), but otherwise, I don’t see an RN need. Too small & slow & noisy for C2, too big & heavy for C3.

    Sorry I didn’t actually build Thetis, but a ship of a similar size, especially in crew. if you are going to have a bigger ship such as T45 for C1 the surely you can save on the size of C2?

    Besides more ice strengthened ships might be needed soon, with the NW Passage opening up and Antarctic ice cap breaking up the RN will be hard pressed to intervene with just Endurance.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032456
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Thetis, who knew it would be editted out?

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032458
    pjhydro
    Participant

    In this particular case, I think that asking for T45 hulls for all of C1 & C2 is pushing things too far, great though it seems to be.

    Agreed. For C1 the t45 hull and much of its outfit would work. For C2 it would be a lot of ship and we would see expensively fueled and crewed ships doing constabulary jobs, aka T42 on Windies drugs duties, that can’t be value for money.

    Surely something more akin to a Danish The**** Frigate in crew size and design is what the RN needs for those jobs?

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032479
    pjhydro
    Participant

    We shouldn’t fall into the trap of confusing size with cost; a mistake made in previous ship orders such as the type 42s and type 22s. Taking a leaf out of the US Spruance class, I think we should be looking at ordering ships comparable in size to the T45s (with as much commonality as possible in terms of hull design and equipment eg propulsion) whilst tailoring the weapon and sensor fit to suit the mission. Keep the sylver silos and the main gun and adapt the silos to launch whatever is required for the mission. Again, commonality of systems will help keep costs down.

    Wise words. The production line is already open. At the very least another 4 T45s that could be used to replace the T22s…use the spare accomodation built for RM etc could be modified to house the flag accomodation and command facilities.

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2450311
    pjhydro
    Participant

    But I was thinking that in these days of joined-uppery then having a helicopter unable to fold up and land on a ship (not neccesarily in that order) would not be useful. Makes it good for sticking in a C17 too.

    Sitting on the tube home I wondered if 847 wouldn’t benfit fromAw149? it can be armed and gives the RM more organic lift.

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2450332
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Having had the weekend sans internet to chew it over there was one obvious problem with the Aw149 that we have over looked. It doesn’t fold up…

    I know Puma (and the first batch Merlin) doesn’t but if we are buying a new helicopter surely we should buy one that can at least fold up into a carrier hanger and perhaps one that folds nicely into the hanger of a frigate would be desirable….

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032870
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Venator looks perfect for C3, it was my first thought when I heard the Aussies wanted to build a multi-role patrol/mcm type. With the Kiwis new patrol ships going **** up, the Italians eyeing up a similar product, the South Africans talking about new hull numbers, I see a juicy order book if BAE pulled their finger out… why not fund a prototype? Worked with the Hawk.

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2455711
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Canada also had a somewhat odd purchase of the Merlin with the program being scrapped upon the election of a new government only to be reintroduced again by said government after having paid all the cancellation fees.

    I’m not suggesting that the Merlin didn’t have problems in its early life but do bear in mind that Canadian articles may well have a political leaning as a reason to make it seem worse than it was.

    No jokes! The Merlin issue was such a political hot potato in Ottawa when I worked there a decade ago. PM Cretin (for he was) had cancelled the big 50 aircraft ASW/SAR order and then watched as Sea Kings and Vouyagers fell out of the sky, the stories cooked up about better value for money of cancelling original Merlin the ordering Cormorant would have made Alistair Cambells head spin.

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2455728
    pjhydro
    Participant

    How is the experience in the UK with their Merlins ? Most things I read about it and it’s variants are negative reports about quality issues and low availability.
    Just two examples:
    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2004/10/20/cormorant_ground041020.html

    http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=f2bb3c5f-8663-4987-bab2-0d598d126052&k=84953

    Also remember that the Cannuck 101s are civvie versions and not full paid up members of the military, it has different engines to the RAF/RN version (T700 vs RTM322) and they came off the Italian line.

    Not sure what the last point says, but I drive a Fiat and the electrics are shocking….

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2461338
    pjhydro
    Participant

    That genuinely made me burst out laughing, even though it no laughing matter. Yeh i’m pretty sure the Puma does have an abysmal safety record in RAF service (Friend is an ex-Puma pilot). Another plus point in replacing it rather than extending it’s life.

    Sorry, gallows humour at the end of a long day.

    Both the AW149 and Merlin both have more plus points than the UH60M really. They would both be made in Yeovil, the merlin is proven and common with much of the current fleet and the AW149 promises to be pretty great without much risk. There isn’t much UH60M can bring to beat that. They may be cheaper on the surface but if the money is all going to the Americans it may not be the best value for money for the British (industrial benefits, British workforce, blah blah blah). That is of course unless they could be kit assembled, but even then I wouldn’t make it the frontrunner.

    I think the Merlin/Wildcat/Aw149 buying combination makes the best sense. Two of them have had the development costs all but paid for and are in production while the third is just a bigger 139. If all three built at Yeovil it could be a real boom time at westland.

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2461435
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Max 2500kg on the hook is not “medium” in my book.

    Underslung is important but we still need something nippy for inserting small patrols etc, UH60M might cover the hook weight in the bargin…

    AW149 might have the “Made at Yeovil” advantage though.

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2461489
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Worst safety record in the RAF isn’t it? I know at least one pilot who’s crashed one.

    Funnily enough that hadn’t crossed my mind…I was thinking of the submarine service Bond Helicopters seems to be running with its new Super Pumas.

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2461913
    pjhydro
    Participant

    EC725 anyone? Price/delivery in its favour, although i acknowledge its a better Puma replacement than a Sea King replacement. Although the money saved over, say, a NH90 purchase would allow for a small Merlin top up buy.

    May as well spend the money on Merlins in that case, EC725 is a puma based airframe built in France, Merlin is a newer design built in the UK. I know where I want my tax money to go…

    Also not too impressed with super puma safety record of late…airframe development pushed beyond limits perhaps?

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2033080
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Bin C2, beef up C3 a little, buy more T45…?

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 845 total)