Please Sir..whats a salopette?
Interesting to hear G-ORDY’s thoughts re Percival’s litigious nature, perhaps this is why there was never a Putnam ‘Percival’ volume?..surely derserving of one in my opinion.
According to the Silvester book, ‘For some reason known only to himself, Percival always chose to start his production numbers at 20’ …I guess we will never know!
The 1987 book Percival & Hunting Aircraft by John Silvester, would tend to support the Ord-Hume view of things.
The author stating that the prototype Gull was built by the Lowe-Wylde concern at Maidstone. Another telling paragraph as to the origin of the species / Hendy 302 etc, mentions the repair of the prototype Gull following an accident in Scotland in 1932.
‘The machine was returned to Brooklands for repair where, as constructional drawings were not available, the wings from the Hendy 302 (G-AAVT) were stripped down and used as a pattern to enable the wings of the Gull to be rebuilt in time for the Kings Cup’.
Edgar Percival not known for his modesty on all accounts, not that I wish to diminish his achievements in anyway.
Chumpy
Hi Tom,…It might well of been me who sent you pix of the 109 wing spar, long time ago it seems. I trust that you have given up on the dreaded spit wing spar??!!!
The attached shot shows the wing structure from a 109e, the wing on the F / G s etc series similar in format. However a lot of detail differences, also shorter in span.
Chumpy.
Just sticking my oar in here… on the subject of things Peregrine.
This belongs to a pal of mine, not sure where it came from, rather nice I think!!
Chumpy.
Some while back I purchased a DVD of a WW2 vintage info film entitled ‘ Daily Inspection of a Spitfire’, this shows in great detail the daily routine of inspection, refueling, rearming etc. Good deatail of the chaps doing there thing, uniforms etc.
I got mine from a well known internet auction site…search for ‘Spitfire Inspection DVD’ and you should find it,… from a seller in Canada!
Cheers, Chumpy.
try the new 1/35th AFV Club Churchill then – with a working suspension it’s possible to have springs simulaneously flying all over the room……………….
sorry this seems to have drifted a long way from the subject
Oooh no thanks, 1/72 was enough for me and many others it seems!
I reckon the Churchill was Airfix’s revenge for all those bogus complaint slips I sent to Haldane Place requesting another transfer sheet / canopy/ prop etc!!
Cheers Chumpy.
Oh thanks Chumpy. Brilliant. 30 years of therapy undone in one sentence. I thought I was passed that bast**d model. Totally forgot about it. Choosing between Airfix’s Churchill tank or being ******** by a priest, I would have chosen Catholicism any day of the week. Not an evil kit, nor one that was badly designed, but…
…I was only ten 🙁
Hi Phil,
So sorry to dredge up your nightmare, but I thought I was alone…shall we form a victims support group?
I seem to recall the Buffalo amphib thingy was a bit similar, thence I stuck strictly to aircraft..and to mothers best table!!
Cheers, Chumpy.
Great show…my ony gripe being that they should have given the kids the Airfix Churchill tank to do.
You try getting all those little boogie wheels in place and sticking the two halves together!!
Chumpy
Spitfire windscreen de-icer tank
Still owned Peter Livanos…should perhaps have said ‘current’ owner!
Chumpy.
Yes it is the true, the new owner of AR213 preferring Duxford rather than Booker as his operating base.
Chumpy.
The words from Chippie re the current CAA situation…. absolutley spot on.
…oh gawd!!
Scans will be tomorrow, pit props sagging!