dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Sabrejet
    Participant

    …which if correct means that I probably witnessed its first flight (as RP-C-1181 for Philippine AL) way back in 1970!

    Sabrejet
    Participant

    First of all I’d request the aircraft record card from the RAF Museum: they are very good at responding.

    Next I’d obtain the 76 Sqn record books (available as PDF downloads in most cases) from the National Archives: go to their ‘Discovery’ tool and search for 76 Sqn. You’ll turn up a lot of hits which won’t be specific to your search, but if you download the results as a .CSV file you can filter the output in Excel to find the date ranges/files you’re looking for. The point is, that in most cases the squadron records will contain crew names and aircraft details for each mission and so you can definitively find aircraft that your great-grandfather crewed.

    in reply to: B-36 Crash site artifacts #788436
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Well I’d agree that it’s a bit savage, but I would also agree that folks taking artefacts and then disposing them as garbage (or in fact selling them on eBay) is something I wouldn’t approve of either 🙂

    in reply to: B-36 Crash site artifacts #788644
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I also have some B-36 (“B36”) artefacts from a UK crash site, recovered with permission of the then landowner. That one would be a very interesting dig since quite a lot left.

    in reply to: North East Land, Sea And Aircraft Museum Diary #796142
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Thunderbird167: appreciate the measured response – mine was a bit waxy, so apologies. I can confirm that USAAF/USAF designations are ‘mission’ – ‘dash’ – ‘type number’ – ‘subtype/variant’, so always ‘F-6D’ for a recce P-51D, ‘F-6K’ etc and ‘P-51/F-51’ etc.

    USN designations can be a nightmare, but in general, pre-1962 they followed the format, ‘mission’ – ‘type number’ – ‘manufacturer’ – ‘dash’ – ‘subtype/variant’; so the production Missileer would have been the F6D-1 and so on. There are always exceptions to the Navy designation system, hence FJ-1 for the Fury rather than F1J-1, F1J-2 etc.

    in reply to: The Hunt For The Missing Hercules 63-7789 #796146
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Again, if you know something…do get in contact.

    Statement about him being unqualified to fly the C-130, statement about him being asked to return to the US/statement that it was a ‘leave’ application and so on. I understand that reporters these days are unlikely to have had a military background but it doesn’t read like an authoritative rundown of events.

    in reply to: Vulcan XL361 in trouble… #796268
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    The F-101 looked neater last time I was at Goose Bay too: but I’d imagine a ton of snow on those Vulcan wings would be the biggest concern, given the years and a fair bit of corrosion.

    in reply to: The Hunt For The Missing Hercules 63-7789 #796272
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-43800089

    That BBC report is atrocious: full of inaccuracies and daft statements such as, “…an aircraft he was not qualified to fly”. Well duh: he was a mechanic for goodness sake! And is all that talk of him patching through to a phone network even feasible in 1969 (or now?)

    Yet again lazy reporting from an organization which should be a paragon.

    in reply to: North East Land, Sea And Aircraft Museum Diary #796457
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Well pedant or not we now have a post elsewhere referring to an F6D (Missileer) – again it seems it’s not about that type at all.

    Accuracy no longer important I guess.

    And I wasn’t being pedantic – I’m still on the lookout for a modern jet engine: a TF34, as used on the A-10 would be ideal (or for non-accuracy speakers “tf-34 used on the a10”).

    in reply to: F6D Little Margaret….. #796463
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    There I was thinking that the Missileer really did exist and it turns out that Lil Margaret is an F-6D. Still the FB post describes it as a ‘P51’ so it seems no-one is really bothered about accuracy anymore.

    in reply to: North East Land, Sea And Aircraft Museum Diary #796890
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Aha: confusing – F100 engine (no hyphen; and as fitted to the F-15 Eagle) versus F-100 aircraft (with hyphen) and now ‘F-100 engine’ mentioned (which I think is a J57?).

    I can see from the photo it’s an F-100!

    Those hyphens are important – it’s what differentiates ‘U2’ (Irish band) from ‘U-2’ (Dragon Lady).

    in reply to: North East Land, Sea And Aircraft Museum Diary #796938
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I noted the comments about the F100 engine above (from an F-15 I guess): can anyone advise how NELSAM came by it? I quite fancied a modern jet engine for display and didn’t realise these later models were available.

    in reply to: Miles Sparowjet #797294
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    R7 refers to the number of registered owners under that reg since allocation

    Aah – makes more sense: thanks 🙂

    in reply to: Miles Sparowjet #797416
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    CAA have its Reference “G-ADNL/R7” – does that denote rebuild status? If so it’s had a busy life.

    in reply to: Miles Sparowjet #797419
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Not much metal in a Sparrowhawk and when you take out the necessary metallic bits of the Sparrowjet, not much left from that time. Shame it won’t emerge as a twin jet, but any Miles product in the skies is better than none!

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 1,675 total)