With a dash not a dot: even the newspaper got that bit right!
Wouldn’t be CAA: MAA has different rules regarding military demos.
But it does remind me of the Hurricane (?) which killed a number of military brass during a weapon firing demonstration on Salisbury Plain during WW2.
Wasn’t ‘Hoagy’ Carmichael the first?
Crashed at (Waddington?)
So Dunkirk doesn’t have the correct demographic. The writer of that Guardian article seems OK (by omission) that the film also featured a Yak dressed as a Spitfire.
So some omissions and concessions for the sake of sanity are OK but not others? All of which goes to show that some people will find something to whinge about on any subject.
Meanwhile I still think the RAFM is losing the plot. I too was pleased to see Baron Jean de Selys Longchamps on that list. Having been intrigued by his exploits and visited his grave I feel that I also have a ‘personal’ link. But he is no more worthy than anyone else and there must be thousands more with far less interesting stories who should be remembered just as much. And he’s famous for being a Typhoon jockey surely? So why ‘The People’s Spitfire Pilot’ exactly? Best way to dumb it down?
I guess “The People’s Rigger” or “The People’s Storeman” doesn’t have quite the same ring, but as Milton so aptly observed, “They also serve who only stand and wait”.
Ahhh those were the days! Many thanks for posting. Where were they taken?
…or three engines run so that they can be inhibited prior to removal?
It never hurts to try!
Especially if someone is authoring something.I politely made the same point on WIX and got nothing for my efforts except insults.
A particular nasty Canadian suggested I had a mental health disorder for even suggesting that people use the correct format.Oh well…
Fully agree: it’s a shame that a quest for accuracy should be given such a negative slant. In fact no – it’s a worrying trend.
15th May 2017: 102 years since great-granddad was killed at the Battle of Aubers Ridge. We all have our remembrances.
TRSjoe…
Since you’re writing about the aircraft allow me to offer a minor correction.
When writing the American designation it’s F-111K, not the UK-style F.111 (unless the that’s what the RAF really planned to call it….I’ve never heard what they would have named it since the type had no official “nickname” at the time.)
I think we are fighting a losing battle: “U2”, “B52” and even “B1b” are commonplace, and not restricted to American types either: the A400M is commonly referred to as “A400” now, even though there is no such designation.
Agree, and a play on words its only a few who do remember…
No – it’s only a few who feel the need to tell people that they’ve remembered.
Did you remember 15th May?
Well worth restoring: though just the chassis plate will remain from the original 😉
F-105K too? Part of the same sad story…
As I was reading the above, I too thought ‘clunky’. No need to mention anyone’s race or sexuality: all were heroes and should be honoured.
Sadly these days you can’t retell history without there being an ‘angle’ – and you’ve only got three days to do it in!
A more worthy aviation cause would be hard to find. Let’s hope that will fund a WW1 hangar: there’s one still with its roof (just) at Filton…