dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: P.51 crash, G-CGOI, 2015. #850450
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Not here…….

    Yet, other replicas (and the odd non aviation topic) were allowed here….

    See Duxford thread for replica Spitfires…

    in reply to: P.51 crash, G-CGOI, 2015. #850573
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Ditto home build Spitfires: but they still get discussed/photographed ad infinitum!

    Sabrejet
    Participant

    In the many previous threads we have seen on this film remake, after most of them became distracted, not to say obsessed, with a particularly tiresome peripheral issue, there was a general consensus that EVERYTHING to be said on that matter had now been said, and that in future we would concentrate on historic aircraft.

    I hope that sentiment still stands.

    Seconded!:eagerness::eagerness:

    in reply to: P47 recovery from the Hudson river post crash film #851717
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Sorry to bring this up, but hard to believe the idiots we share this planet with:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgLf3bU8mE8

    in reply to: Death of the Airshow #852112
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Phew! You had me worried there: I always look forward to the Reds display so that I can get to the car and out of the car park before Joe Public.

    So not all bad news.

    in reply to: Pampa's thread about Dutch Fokkers #853335
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Those Harvards played several roles. They were D.XXIs for the movie ‘Soldaat van Oranje’:

    But also FW-190s for the movie ‘Soldaat van Oranje’:

    Hawker Tempest (for ‘A Bridge Too Far’):

    And P-47s:

    Cracking shots! Many thanks – I’d forgotten these.

    in reply to: Visit to the Biggin Hill Heritage Hangar #853634
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Blimey, that depends on how much of the Spitfire you actually mean at times 🙂

    Reminds me of the quote used for the Ferrari 250 GTO: “39 built, of which 43 still survive” 😉

    in reply to: Pampa's thread about Dutch Fokkers #853648
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    The ‘little known’ Fokker D.XXI. Nothing new or rare, and no text to go with this latest batch of pilfered images. Hopefully I’ve saved others the bother of looking.

    in reply to: Seen in an Austrian bar……… #855224
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Prop looks like Fokker F.27.

    in reply to: Burma Expedition News. #855388
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    There are better places to take a freebie holiday: see TIGHAR thread.

    in reply to: Dunkirk film – Merged For General Updates And Chat #855618
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Originally Posted by snafu View Post

    It wouldn’t matter, the monitor was not a WWII type of ship…

    Bizarre statement: also see Terror and Erebus!!! How soon we forget…

    in reply to: Dunkirk film – Merged For General Updates And Chat #855854
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Cruisers? No chance! The only WW2 era ‘warships’ I can think of that are seaworthy are an MTB (or MGB), which was actually at Dunkirk in 1940, or a ‘Liberty’ ship (hardly accurate for 1940)!

    Maybe this is just the typical media misconception of what a ‘battleship’ is; describing any warship as a ‘battleship’ is a bit like calling any aircraft capable of carrying more than one passenger a ‘Jumbo Jet’!

    If Christopher Nolan did want to inject a bit of accuracy into his Dunkirk film he could use the $5million to bring HMS Whimbrel back from Egypt; it could pass for a Royal Navy destroyer / sloop in the film and then could be donated to a United Kingdom museum as a lasting memorial to those that served in escorts during the war, something that this country has conspicuously failed to do.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Whimbrel_(U29)

    I won’t hold my breath.

    CD: thanks for that – I was hoping that a second monitor might survive somewhere but unlikely. I think they were all scrapped except for the ship at Portsmouth. The existence of Whimbrel (though sadly not a monitor!) was news to me.

    in reply to: Dunkirk film – Merged For General Updates And Chat #855860
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Isn’t the most likely scenario that this is actually a load of boll*cks?

    I would tend to agree: talk of battleships ditto. Most likely a few cruisers at best but I can’t think of a seaworthy battleship anywhere.

    However a crashed Spitfire replica would hardly be missed: just build a new one to replace it. 🙂

    in reply to: F86 Sabre Luftwaffe #857624
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Thank you for that info. I could not recall seeing one whilst on my travels quite thin on the ground. I went to collect the front fuse section a couple of months ago however there was a problem with the width so the back end came first.
    Are you the gentleman I spoke to a few months ago regarding a seat and radar cap? If so could you pm me. Thanks once more PC

    I am indeed: PM sent.

    in reply to: Definitive B-52 Book? #857658
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    As you note, the only ones left are the “H”‘s…with 102 built in the early 60s and the last delivered in October of 1962. About 15 have been lost in crashes…and some are stored but I’d expect some at D-M have been cannibalize.

    Evocative recollections of DM: I too was lucky to see those rows of BUFFs back in the late ’80s. I think most of the strake-equipped B-52Gs were scrapped as part of SALT II, though I recall reading in contemporary press that H’s were also due to receive strakes (which were of dubious worth other than as a recognition feature).

    Supposedly all the Hs at DM are in special store, with all forbidden for parts reclamation. One came out last year for return to service and I’d guess another will be soon, to replace ‘Neanderthaul’ lost on Guam.

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,675 total)