Gents,
Thanks for the pointers: I had wondered about Yenne, and though I agree that maybe a B-52 book is a bit pointless, I had thought that some good, well-researched work might be out there. Shame really, but not totally unexpected. As with many aircraft subjects, unless a dedicated enthusiast comes along most will be covered by authors writing to a quota. It’s not a scenario which encourages proper research.
My renewed interest started when I was talking to someone who told me (with some conviction) that ’40’ were still in service, but that the USAF had ‘hundreds’ in store: the figure (considering only the H model is still active) can’t be more than the just over 100 produced, and it seems that 73-ish are still active (or at least ‘not in storage’) and 15 or so in special storage for Immediate Reserve (or whatever the USAF term is these days). The ’73’ includes NASA’s B-52H, and a couple assigned to the Edwards TW.
I’ll see if I can find the Key special, which brought to mind a World Air Power Review of Winter 1996 (now retrieved from the garage) memory served well that it did a good job of covering more recent events/developments [edit: up to 1996 obviously]. Ditto the Crowood book: theirs seem to be a mix of ‘quota’ and ‘enthusiast’ writers, and sometimes they did produce a gem: I hadn’t seen the BUFF book I have to say.
F-86D 51-6171 at Sunderland/NEAM
Sabre 4 XB812 at Cosford/RAFM
F-86A 48-242 at Coventry/MAM
Rear fuse of Sabre 5 23140 at Coventry/MAM
F-86L canopy at Manston museum (they think it’s F-86D but it’s not)
Various wreck recoveries – mainly RAF.
Plus a few bits with collections: Newark did have a nice RCAF Sabre 5/6 speed brake panel for instance. Somewhere will be the stuff I loaned to Jet Heritage years ago, plus I have a few odds & sods.
PS – saw your rear fuse had arrived already!
From here — http://www.af.mil/News.aspx
ROYAL AIR FORCE FAIRFORD, England (AFNS) — With the sharp screech of rubber meeting asphalt, two B-52 Stratofortress bombers from Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, touched down June 2 at Royal Air Force Fairford.
Third arrived yesterday; and one out/in to ILA at Berlin. Despite what The Mail might say, no further B-52s expected. Although one should never say ‘never’.
Tim,
Thanks: I hadn’t seen this one. I think it must be, “B-52 Stratofortress: Boeing’s Cold War Warrior (Osprey modern military)” published in 1995 and co-authored by Robert F Dorr and Lindsay Peacock; illustrations by Mike Badrocke.
Found one on Amazon so ordered it!
I’d be wary of citing books (no matter how respected the author) over the primary source data in Post 1.
Great news: let’s hope it presages a few other common sense decisions in this vein.
I’ve now been researching this subject for nearly eight years. In that time I’ve gathered a siginificant amount of material and information about the history of the Satyr after Mildred Bruce made her famous backward landing in it. I still have a few lines of enquiry to pursue but, as is inevitably the case, the final ones are always the most difficult. Hopefully when these are concluded, I’ll be able to write up my research. It won’t support a book but, I believe, it will generate a detailed and, I hope, interesting article.
Or an Appendix to Peter Amos’ books? (or Vol.4??)
Great work Peter (Vol.3 is out in July I hear: about time too!). Also intrigued to hear of the replica Satyr: anyone have more detail?
I know that…the potentially working Griffon went to Roy Millington, at Millington Air Base…
Millington Race Engines surely?
Announced a few years ago: “construction started” maybe?
The double-bay WW1 hangar roofing was completed a few weeks ago and construction of foundations for the Concorde exhibit started around that time. Still no news on the other large WW1 hangar (I still hope it will go to Stow Maries), but the main site around the Bristol Collection’s new museum and Concorde exhibit does at least look secure now that work is starting to be completed.
Beautiful shots David: keep them coming!
I’d suggest looking/posting on Fighter Control forum.
Because this way we get two potentially airworthy Canberras instead of one 🙂
Sounds unlikely: so instead of getting the mean machine, we get the meh machine. Don’t want to sound too down on this, but the PR.9 would be a far better option.
A looong way to go before the doubters will be proved wrong: one flight is neither an airshow season, nor the many which she has flown prior to today.
Not one to side with either, but for now a good start.