There’s a bit more to it than that. Its certainly no worse than many of the Mustangs currently flying.
I wouldn’t disagree!
If you are a Facebook user, type Biggin Hill Heritage Hangar into the search box, and you’ll find it.
Its a rebuild based on remains recovered from Malta.
A replica then. Sadly I can’t receive Facebook via ‘work’ internet, but will have a look later. Nevertheless it’s great to see another Spitfire creation, whatever its provenance (or lack thereof).
Can’t get the link to work: rebuild or replica?
I’ve just seen another one. Canberra’s. In this case, it IS a plural.
I noticed that too but was trying to ignore it for risk of head explosion.
No! You can’t quote a drawing. The Molesworth books were written by Geoffrey Willans (although Molesworth senior is known to lay claim to authorship of the works) and illustrated by Ronald Searle – as any fule [should] no!
AA (aka the Accidental Pedant)
Shameful: I shud hav kno that!
To quote Nigel Molesworth/Ronald Searle, “…as any fule no”.
…and why the current habit of writing, could ‘of’, should ‘of’ etc?
I used to think this was a quaint Bristolianism, but it’s becoming universal.
And don’t get me started in it’s and its!!!
HANGAR – a thing for putting aeroplanes in.
HANGER – a thing for hanging clothes on.
And yes, I am a proud grammar Nazi.
Careful: you’d get expelled from the Labour party for saying that (or less)!
🙂
There is one American forum that I occasionally visit that thinks this guy is the cat’s behind! I almost got the boot when I mentioned how he rips off other sites, forums and books to post ” his ” stuff and how he never ever makes any comments afterwards.
Chris
Sorry to hear that Chris, but not surprised. It doesn’t take much effort to be a respected ‘expert’ these days!
🙂
Also helps keep the riff-raff away. :eagerness:
Has anything actually been proven, disproven … or is likely to be, either way? I suggest not after this length of time.
All conjecture, and though interesting, without anything new it’s ultimately a bit pointless.
I’ve noticed this on a lot of Tiger Moths: I assumed it was a DH thing and not ‘approved’ in any way.
Going back to WW1, it seemed that anything went, and that aircraft markings were very much at the whim of the sign-writers: I have seen dots, dashes and even the odd apostrophe between the first letter and subsequent digits of an aircraft serial number.
Yep – Glenn Miller’s gone missing too.
🙂
[ATTACH=CONFIG]245299[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]245300[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]245301[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]245302[/ATTACH]
WL741 at Manston 1986: I just wish I’d taken a photo of the other side…
[ATTACH=CONFIG]245291[/ATTACH]