dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bristol Aero Engines collection #897700
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    AA: I can’t recall what happened with the Old Warden thread, though I did supply a couple of Blackburne photos.

    RRHT has/had two Cherubs – photos here taken same day in 2005:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245030[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245031[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Bristol Aero Engines collection #900332
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I suspect they are now with RRHT at Filton: a great collection which I think is open by appointment these days.

    EDIT:

    Visits to the Heritage Centre and to research the records held by the Bristol Branch are by prior appointment only. To arrange a visit to the Bristol Branch, contact Jayne Rogers, Visits Administrator on:-
    Telephone: +44 (0) 1332 823888
    E-mail: [email]jayne.rogers@rolls-royce.com[/email]

    in reply to: Tracing Grandfathers service record ww2. #900801
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    You can obtain his service record gratis from RAF Cranwell, if his widow is still alive. Otherwise only £30:

    RAF Disclosures
    Room 6, Trenchard Hall
    RAFC Cranwell
    Sleaford
    Lincs NG34 8HB

    I imagine this is what you’ve applied for. I’d wait and then use it as the basis for a TNA search.

    in reply to: Unknown aircraft – any ideas? #901567
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Gotha Go-242.

    in reply to: Amelia New Book…. #901665
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    If we wait long enough, Pampa will post a link: then we can earn him money for the privilege of learning nothing worthwhile! Again.

    :eagerness:

    in reply to: General Discussion #224083
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Why is this thread in ‘Historic Aviation’?

    Car (auto) and aircraft technology often run in parallel paths: in the case of the D-Type/XKSS it was probably the first race car to employ aluminium monocoque construction (though I know there was the Issigonis Special prior to that), so it has a great deal in common with aircraft of the 40s/50s.

    Recent carbon fibre construction methods again began in the race car world with CanAm in the ’60’s and on that occasion it took aerospace a while to catch up. Use of titanium again was echoed in race cars (CanAm again), and there are many ‘wings and wheels’ type events which deliberately cater for the phenomena of car enthusiasts also being interested in aviation.

    Graham Warner, Spencer Flack and many others raced cars and operated historic aircraft.

    Aside from that, many historic aircraft engines survive and run, only because they are fitted in race cars: I’m thinking of the unique Sunbeam Maori, various WW1-era aero-engined specials etc. There is even a FIAT-based monster which races with an Isotta-Fraschini airship engine.

    So (for me, as one with interests in both camps), perfectly appropriate here.

    in reply to: Jaguar To Build Another 9 XKSS #1792996
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Why is this thread in ‘Historic Aviation’?

    Car (auto) and aircraft technology often run in parallel paths: in the case of the D-Type/XKSS it was probably the first race car to employ aluminium monocoque construction (though I know there was the Issigonis Special prior to that), so it has a great deal in common with aircraft of the 40s/50s.

    Recent carbon fibre construction methods again began in the race car world with CanAm in the ’60’s and on that occasion it took aerospace a while to catch up. Use of titanium again was echoed in race cars (CanAm again), and there are many ‘wings and wheels’ type events which deliberately cater for the phenomena of car enthusiasts also being interested in aviation.

    Graham Warner, Spencer Flack and many others raced cars and operated historic aircraft.

    Aside from that, many historic aircraft engines survive and run, only because they are fitted in race cars: I’m thinking of the unique Sunbeam Maori, various WW1-era aero-engined specials etc. There is even a FIAT-based monster which races with an Isotta-Fraschini airship engine.

    So (for me, as one with interests in both camps), perfectly appropriate here.

    in reply to: Kestrel XS 691 (XV6A 64-18265) status? #902863
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    And while we’re at it: here’s the VFW VAK 191B, which is also at Schleissheim:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244837[/ATTACH]

    There’s another VAK 191B at Bremen.

    in reply to: General Discussion #224173
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Hi All,
    While I love the idea of these continuation builds at the same time I can’t help thinking they are just cash cows and making money on the rarity of whatever vehicle they will produce, even possibly reducing the whatever original rare vehicles value or am I being to cynical ?

    Geoff.

    It doesn’t seem to work that way: there are plenty of GTO ‘toolroom’ copies but prices for originals and replicas keeps rising. Ditto pontoon-fender Testa Rossas and Aston DB4GT Zagatos.

    What Jaguar is doing in nothing new and gives us a chance of seeing (in the case of the E-Type Lightweights rather than the XKSS) period-correct cars racing in anger, where the originals are becoming too risky to race. More power to their elbow I say.

    Last week’s Goodwood Member’s Meeting contained a great many cars “…of various provenance” as commentator Marcus Pye nicely put it. I doubt many noticed.

    Difficult to see where Jaguar would go now though: XJ13 maybe?

    in reply to: Jaguar To Build Another 9 XKSS #1793073
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Hi All,
    While I love the idea of these continuation builds at the same time I can’t help thinking they are just cash cows and making money on the rarity of whatever vehicle they will produce, even possibly reducing the whatever original rare vehicles value or am I being to cynical ?

    Geoff.

    It doesn’t seem to work that way: there are plenty of GTO ‘toolroom’ copies but prices for originals and replicas keeps rising. Ditto pontoon-fender Testa Rossas and Aston DB4GT Zagatos.

    What Jaguar is doing in nothing new and gives us a chance of seeing (in the case of the E-Type Lightweights rather than the XKSS) period-correct cars racing in anger, where the originals are becoming too risky to race. More power to their elbow I say.

    Last week’s Goodwood Member’s Meeting contained a great many cars “…of various provenance” as commentator Marcus Pye nicely put it. I doubt many noticed.

    Difficult to see where Jaguar would go now though: XJ13 maybe?

    in reply to: VC-121 Constellation May Fly Again? #902917
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Re: XH558 replacement I think we have a winner! I could watch Connies all day.

    in reply to: General Discussion #224181
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Hear hear! However I did assume Post #1 was tongue-in-cheek…

    in reply to: Jaguar To Build Another 9 XKSS #1793101
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Hear hear! However I did assume Post #1 was tongue-in-cheek…

    in reply to: Midair Squadron in receivership #904819
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    PR.9s never cease to impress: might even have added value as a photo mapping aircraft. Must be a market out there for an aircraft which can fly higher than most modern machinery?

    in reply to: Midair Squadron in receivership #905216
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Not surprised: I was there but missed the auction. Let’s hope for the best.

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 1,675 total)