Many thanks for the information. My question has been answered but there is still the question why FP does not appear to proofread articles before publication. This seems to be an issue that goes right back to the early days. When they advertised for an editor a few years back, they asked what you would do to improve the magazine if selected. In my application, I said that I would ensure that everything was proof read. I did not get the job. I find it very sad that FP and other publications fail to see how important proof reading is today.
Should all be part of the Editor’s job as you say. In many good magazines you used to get a nice comment, suffixed ‘- Ed’, which would often add a personal recollection or emphasise a statement. I think you are probably wasting your time expecting an answer or any improvement from FP. But fortunately there are a number of other good titles on the newsstand!
Not convinced: ‘LTA’ vs ‘ALT’, ‘k’ vs ‘kt’ and why ‘deflection’? I think we’re talking about two different things here?
Need to search ‘Gladiator’ here:
http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/search
You might also try visting The National Archives (which holds a good collection of Air Publications) and also try the FAA Museum and Shuttleworth Collection.
RAF Museum would also be worth a contact: all will supply images on request. It won’t all be gratis, but you should get what you need.
Also the Gladiator Pilot’s Notes would be a good start for instrument locations/functions. The PN’s are usually available in reprint via Amazon, eBay etc.
Air Gunner – deflection might refer to target practice (deflection shoot?) 10k might be 10,000 ft?
The C-97 has been signed off for flight in the last day or two.
Europe next then? :eagerness:
The only potentially flyable C-97 right now is in New York. Lufthansa’s L-1649 will be flying soon though – probably 2017.
2017 seems VERY optimistic for the LH Starliner: progress is being made, but only slowly.
The C-97 is at Floyd Bennet Field, NY and has been engine running recently.
Ah, apologies I’d forgotten the Royal Aircraft Factory (RAF) Farnborough existed before the Royal Air Force (RAF) was formed by the amalgamation of the Royal Flying Corps (RFC) and Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS). RAF Farnborough became the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) which in later years became the Royal Aerospace Establishment (RAE), a naughty subtle change that one, then the Defence Research Agency (DRA), and then the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) and finally privatised as QinetiQ, and no that last one isn’t an abbreviation.
Yes – the Royal Aircraft Factory was renamed on 1st April 1918 to avoid confusion with the ‘new’ RAF! In fairness the ‘factory’ didn’t actually produce much in terms of hardware, instead serving more of a design function. It gradually assumed the research role it later became famous for.
But RAE (or even RAF) has a much nice ring to it than QinetiQ ever will I think!
Yes I keep making that mistake, sorry. RFC / AFC it is !
Ewan: see other post: it is definitely an RAF BE.2a! It may well have been flown by the RFC/AFC, but still an RAF (Royal Aircraft Factory) designed machine!
Surely the BE2a pre date the RAF wouldn’t they have originally been RFC
Royal Aircraft Factory (RAF – designers of the BE.2a) formed pre- WW1 and as I stated in post #4 above, I doubt there’s much that exists of RAF design prior to the BE.2a.
They would indeed be some early RAF stuff if they’re BE.2a: I can’t think of a surviving type which would be earlier.
More modern aircraft have been rebuilt to fly around far less!
Ewan – that looks a great job: clear, uncluttered and well-presented.
What’s the history of the BE.2a wings?
Here’s the sole (?) remaining J8M at Chino last year (& no, its not an Me163 copy as Pete suggested).
The evidence (like the fact that it’s close to being visually the same) says otherwise…
Met the man a couple of times 1979/80 and was always in awe of his work. Thankfully we have much to remember him by.
I just washed my hands in a public lavatory – and dried them under a jet of cold air
Ken
…or was it a rocket?
:stupid: