You could try Merlin Pete (as he is known on here) I believe his company is Flight Engineering (Leeds) or else Retro Track & Air but check the depth of your pockets prior to contacting them……
Are the three stubs not mustang? they have different reinforcing on the tips as well.
With no disrespect to the Medway preservation group, who turn out top quality restorations, I’m saddened that Stoke on Trent council have repaid all of the hard work by Supermarine Engineering (much of it free of charge) by giving the job to someone 200 miles away……
All well and good, but the essential question, WILL IT BE A LEGENDS needs to be addressed, WHAT? oh come on, I’ve been a forum member for over 12 years and I’ve never asked that question once before……..
Maybe looking for some crowd funding, to cover the” death duties” as and when a death has occurred….
I have the tailwheel tyre from this A/C (removed before the crash I hastened to add) perhaps they are worried about a legal challenge over the identity?
Bruce, the HSE bit was in response to FB’s post, the RAFM’s piece was essentially a mission statement, but to me a pretty naïve one, given the absolute hostility of the working environment, that said having watched the video excerpts, I think the recovery team did a remarkable job, even more of a shame how (and where) it has ended up.
The HSE have no control over activities in a foreign country, nor was it the RAFM recovering the A/C, therefore a mission statement, from them to include checking for fuel when in reality what hadn’t been used up in the flight, would have evaporated over the subsequent 70 years, was pointless; were the recovery team really going to give up because all of the criteria given to them (by the RAFM) could not be met?
Just seen your post Bruce, not a response to that as such!
Sorry, “an unsympathetic restoration” the airframe has been butchered, what do you suppose they put in the wings to reattach the landing gear, (or indeed any other part that had severed) and really are you saying that the RAFM gave over a spitfire so that a third party could move the P40 for the Egyptians? they were quite capable of moving that themselves, they were just not interested in doing so.
To summarise my position; the p40 and Sgt Copping are inextricably linked, the harrowing and indeed perplexing story of both their final hours is what should be remembered, and the best way of achieving that would have been to display the A/C in the UK where his exploits and sacrifice would be best appreciated.
If a German aeroplane were found in a reservoir or lake, (as suggested) then I really don’t see why that couldn’t be returned to Germany, where they would (I believe) care for A/C and bury the dead pilot and honour him, as would we; clearly in this case that hasn’t happened .
Oh yeah, that is an option no one thought of obviously, shame on them. What the recovery team should have done, was dig a trench in the sand and bury the P-40, that would have ensured its safety
You know I think you may be on to something there……… because, lets face it if they had have done that, it wouldn’t have been completely butchered would it?
Dave I think we’ll have to agree to disagree, what with you being a stalwart of the restoration community, and me ,well just an inhabitant of the couch….. but the comparison between the P40 and the P38 wasn’t one of condition, but one of safety, and at the moment the P38 is safest, as it is back under the sand.
Bruce, I don’t think we are looking for someone to blame, more the acceptance of blame (or the lack of) by the RAFM; fundamentally they should not have agreed to swap the spitfire (public property) for half the job,(and personally I think they should have paid in cash) clearly they have never heard of “no win no fee”.
“As for recovery – its in a dangerous part of the world -it would require government approval and a fair amount of money”.
From David Burke right at the beginning of this saga.
“Moving the aircraft ASAP was definitely a success and ensured its survival, at last in some form”.
Exactly how much of this A/C is represented in this display? are you assuming (see what I did there) that there are substantial remains of the P40 incorporated into the “display”?
Moving this airframe from where it was, to where it is, is a bit like dragging the p38 at Harlech up the beach a bit, it’s fine until the next high tide/Arab spring, they haven’t ensured it’s survival, indeed I don’t believe that was their primary directive, that was to add something to their tourist attraction, which they have done.
Just to add that I have now seen a decent resolution photograph of the P40, and the work is horrendous, forget about the colour or the sharks mouth or the roundels but look at the rad intake especially at the back where the vent flaps should be, and where it merges into the fuselage (or in this case doesn’t) the wing root is flat like it’d hit a pole, and the large characteristic fairing forward of the U/C leg is non existent, and you guys are telling me they’ve done a good job……… I’m off back to me couch.
I have no idea as to what you have worked on, and yes you are right many so called restorations in the western world are nothing more than new build, because new metal is easier to work with than old, and requires less skilled workers, and is ultimately cheaper, doesn’t make it right though does it?