Must be a lot of mod plates about….
looks as though they’ve used a Russian haulier….
Spitfire looking good Tony; your not a dealer are you?
Ok ,thanks for that, it’s just that I thought it was attached!
The Hurricane project looks interesting, the front of that Merlin is probably repairable; obviously it’s very nearly not a cockpit, and will suffer the same fate as my own project…….
Tony’s Spitfire looks much more complete than last year; looks like he’s been missing a lot of Coronation street……
Is that Roger Marley’s Typhoon? it was a whole fuselage when I last looked…
Anyone utters the words Spitfire, graceful, sleek, or stylish, will be sacked by order S CAMM esq.
tonyt, spitfireman, ade and others,
Many thanks for thinking about this anecdote, and for the information provided. The revolver was a Smith & Wesson .38 ‘top-break ‘exactly as shown in this article:
http://www.shootingtimes.com/handgun_reviews/smith_12_0507/
I should like to have kept it, as we would any family heirloom, but we’re probably better off without it in this day and age, in the light of recent events.
Phil
Sadly .38 isn’t obsolete, and I think you did the right thing, even getting it de activated would be a problem, as it has to be a recorded firearm, (i.e from a legitimate source) to be deactivated; some crash/digs recovered weapons that are badly corroded and/or damaged, are classed as relics.
Paul, if it is a single, yes but a kingsize, would need an awful lot of guns…..
You can legally hold a certificate for a pistol providing it was made before 1911,and it is locked in a vault at a designated,home office approved range/club eg- Bisley.
This is section 7.Also if a firearm in ones possession as “war trophy” it can be held providing it is of historical significance.
Clause 36 and 37 for VCRA for RIFs,membership of reenactment society etc. .There is a list on the firearms act that tells you the obsolete calibers.
If i am wrong on any of the above,I stand corrected.
Try getting a section 7 firearms, this is essentially for an existing collector; you cannot count weapons that you already own that you have shown “a need” for, as however old they might be, or historically important, they weren’t applied for as part of a collection, and therefore can’t be included in a “collection”.
Not sure you were breaking any law here.
I was told any gun over 100 years does not need a FAC therefore can be legally owned by anyone. Doesn’t mean you can carry it up the high street though.
Not great advice, I’m afraid, as I’ve said elsewhere on this forum, my Martini Henry .22 is about 1870, and very much a firearm; if it were still in it’s original calibre .450/577, it would be classed as an obsolete calibre, and no licence required.
In a word, deactivation.
Apparently the law see’s a firearm as just that, regardless of condition, until accompanied with a deact cert, and a proof house stamp on the (former) weapon.
A live pistol is about as bad as it gets, 1; they are all banned, 2; ammunition is readily available, (because none was found, doesn’t mean there isn’t any) 3; under the bed doesn’t constitute a secure place, (potentially another weapon to fall into the hands of criminals).
under the bed for 30 years is only back to 1980, pistol ownership was heavily regulated then, (terrorist threat from the IRA) serial no’s were recorded; it would be interesting to know if it was ever a licenced firearm.
Got to be honest on this one, most people don’t have insurance cover for their cockpits,(other than when on a trailer on the road) and rely on the events own insurance to cover them.
Public liability is needed for any public contact with the display, without which, the canopies and doors will (should) remain shut; you will get a far better response, by putting them on your events cover.
Further to Pete’s post, the Packard crankcase/lower crankcase, (and wheel case) use a larger size stud than the British versions, but once removed, the thread in the casting is exactly the same size! thus interchangeability is achieved!
Boys book of spitfires, by mk12, also available in large print for the more senior readers….
No probs, in a strange but true moment, I caught an obit of the chap who played baron munchhausen (?) in the WizofOz, and He did in fact train pilots, (WW2) but obviously was too short to fly combat missions; lived into his nineties, well done that man.
To fly an aeroplane.