dark light

stuart gowans

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,986 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1174459
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Lets not forget also that the merchant navy had an equally rough deal, they wern’t allowed to march, even until recently, no campaign medal etc, and on shore leave many were spat at or beaten up, because not wearing a uniform, the were considered conscription dodgers; and lets not forget that these people were in the main British, and were equally responsible for saving our bacon, as any other service.

    in reply to: RFC Aerodrome to be restored in the UK #1174462
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I’d be suprised if it became an active airfield again, there is a model A/C club that uses the site, and they had to apply for a certificate of lawfullness to carry on flying their models; Maldon council aren’t keen (as most councils aren’t) on having a new airfield open, and there has been no flying from this site since ww1.

    It was used as accomodation during ww2, and one of the hangars was bombed (probably in error) and a wounded Hurricane landed there;the biggest problem is that the site is bisected with footpaths,and as such it is hard to see how a decent size strip could be reinstated, without “fear of public safety” there is an airstrip about half a mile away, but this appears unused now.

    When I viewed the site last year I took some photos of the buildings, they are in pretty poor condition, but very well made, most of the roofs are close boarded in a herringbone pattern, and at least one of them is home to barn owls.

    There is also a weight restriction on the access road, (7.5t). making it difficult to service the site, and a tennant in the bungalow with protected tenancy (for life) with rights of succession.

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1175074
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    My Dad marched in the victory parade, not because he was particularily heroic or brave, but because he was tall; I’m sure that there were those who thought some others more deserving of such accolade, at the time.

    We read too much into events during and imediately post war, we were a nation on its knees, and Churchill wasn’t the man he was at the start of the war, and even if he were, he is not too blame, that lies with Nazi Germany, Imperialist Japan, and Stalinist Russia.

    in reply to: RFC Aerodrome to be restored in the UK #1175099
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Thats good news; I tendered for lot 2 at the time, and had the distinction of being the lowest bid of the lot!

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1176838
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Lets also not forget that we sold them short, and will forever be in debt to them.

    I think the phrase ” when your up to your ar5e in alligators, it’s hard to remember the original intention was to drain the swamp” may be of some relevance.

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1177551
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Lets not forget the the Poles were fighting for the freedom of Poland, and for the freedom to return to Poland; as in part so were we.

    in reply to: Dubai #1180332
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Just booked holiday for this year to Dubai for last two weeks in September, Anything worth looking out for?

    Legionaires……

    in reply to: What would a non flying replica Spitfire cost? #1187951
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    So what does a full size model teach that a large plastic kit cannot?

    I wouldn’t want to see a Spitfire or Hurricane at our Museum, as it is not appropriate.

    On a personal level – and it is just that, I am not a fan of such replicas; they have nothing to teach the future generation, except for the manner in which it was interpreted by the builder.

    I’ll clarify that sweeping statement….! What I am saying is that I’m not a fan of replicas that deviate from the original manner of construction in any way. The original artefacts we leave behind are as important a way of learning history as any document.

    Bruce

    I would be possible to display a composite replica in such a way that various parts of the airframe were open for inspection, the cockpit for example could be made exact, whilst the innards of the wings not.

    This would allow people to sit in it, and get a real feel for what it was like; have you ever noticed how claustrophobic they are when you get the hood shut?

    Other “interesting” parts such as the engine could be displayed cowlings off, the guns as well, but as Bruce hints at, it would have to be displayed as a replica or mockup,in order that the public don’t feel conned, and then it would probably loose its appeal, as a “genuine Spitfire”.

    I for one am at a loss as to why someone would put such a huge effort into building one, and then detour so far away from the original design, that you have a steel box frame inside, giving yourself a huge problem with weight and rigidity, the former exacerbated by the latter.

    in reply to: What would a non flying replica Spitfire cost? #1191484
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Your going to struggle for a Merlin III….

    I would also ask, to what purpose you would put this replica, and as a consequence how accurate does it need to be; one thing’s for sure, what ever you make it out of, it will be sginificantly heavier than an original.

    in reply to: Film horrors #1196192
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Well I have to admit I still enjoy Memphis Belle; you could take the view that overall it is no less accurate than BoB, the latter, whilst sticking to the actual events, still includes ficticious characters and a condensed storyline (which admittedly is all a film of 2-3 hours length can offer), and ofcourse the mkIX Spitfire wasn’t available in 1940.

    I’m sure everything that happened in the film actually happened to someone, there were so many B17’s flying, over here, that it must have; maybe even that crew, just not all on the last mission!

    in reply to: Film horrors #1197989
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I can’t believe you guys, for a nation as historically acute as the Brits are, you seem to resent anyone making a film about anyone other than Tommies and the RAF fighting the war.
    Some people here have even complained about Saving Private Ryan not including UK forces!

    Sometimes, Americans will make a film about American forces.
    What’s wrong with that?

    It’s said back in the 60s vets had the BBC quit showing “The Rat Patrol” a gung -ho silly American series about North Africa because they said it showed the “Americans winning the war”.
    Excuse me, but there were some Americans in the desert.
    (BTW: the show had a Brit in the unit…)

    Or should Cint Eastwood have made a British Commando unit appear on Iwo Jima?

    How about a Lancaser over Tokyo?

    How about the HMS Price of Wales sinking the Japanese fleet at Midway?

    Or some mighty Metors and Vampires dicing it up with MiGs in “The Hunters”?

    Are you so insecure that you can’t accept anyone else did fighting?

    David O Selznick(producer) complained bitterly to the director of “The Third Man” that there were no American soldiers in the film, (or for that matter any mention of the American forces); there were just 2 zones, the British, and the Russian; the director was Guy Hamilton….

    BTW anyone noticed the series1 Landrover parked up, in the last few seconds of “Ice cold in Alex”?

    in reply to: International Cockpit Club #1203968
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Does it need ‘members’ as such, can it not be run like this forum?
    Anyone can help from all around the world, it’s in cyberspace.

    Even this forum has members, its just a term to describe the participants (as I’m sure you know).

    No, it doesn’t have to be an active club (as was the intention), but you have to ask the question, do we need another forum?, and what will it be called, International cockpit(s)? as to use the word “club”, implies something beyond the virtual world.

    I have to say, that the one thing that would annoy the hell out of me, is trying to maintain a gallery, with the current owners credited, with such a high turnover of cockpits; I realise that I’m as guilty as anyone on that subject, or I have been in the past.

    Another thought, is that if it was centered around just one event, and that event were to come to an end, what would become of the, er, um, club ?

    in reply to: International Cockpit Club #1204018
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I suppose its a geographical issue, as much as anything, with members spread out not just in the UK, but throughout the world; we don’t meet up much, especially now some of the aero jumbles are defunct, events wise its just the cockpit fest.

    I’m probably not alone in wanting more for the ICC, but it’s demise is easily atributable to the apathy of some of its members, I’m sure that Mark has the “membership” details but I seem to remember it stood (at one point) at over 100, of which about 10 were active.

    in reply to: General Discussion #359038
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    As already said, that’s because it was settled by Bretons/Britons* from Great Britain – which is called Great Britain/Grande Bretagne to distinguish it from the other Bretagne.

    “Who were Welsh-cum-Cornish fleeing the Angles, Saxons, & Jutes, so we can’t really claim they had anything to do with England.

    Although clearly they would all be allowed to play for England , after all there have been far more controversial appointments ……

    in reply to: Good Bye #1922207
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    As already said, that’s because it was settled by Bretons/Britons* from Great Britain – which is called Great Britain/Grande Bretagne to distinguish it from the other Bretagne.

    “Who were Welsh-cum-Cornish fleeing the Angles, Saxons, & Jutes, so we can’t really claim they had anything to do with England.

    Although clearly they would all be allowed to play for England , after all there have been far more controversial appointments ……

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,986 total)