dark light

stuart gowans

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,986 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Great Escape Memorial #1233754
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I presume you are referring to “the one that got away” with Hardy Kruger; a typical British black and white film; had they wanted to portray his escape as funny they would have had Norman Wisdom play the lead role, as it was, the film makers were probably still mindfull, that showing German success stories, was not good box office business, and portraying them having a laugh at us, was one script too far.

    The Great Escape, on the other hand is very flippant in its view of the Germans Guards (goons), and compresses so many escape attempts into the first 10 minutes, that its hard to take it seriously.

    However, we are brought down to earth with a bump, upon hearing (and seeing) that the Germans, were not in fact “goons”, but cold blooded killers, and unfortunately not an untypical act of brutality, hither to reserved for civillians of the occupied countries.

    in reply to: The Great Escape Memorial #1234146
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Would it get beyond the risk assessment?

    in reply to: American Air Day Duxford #1235997
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Just make sure you do something with the jar.
    My mate was taking his dog for a walk on !!!!!! beach very early last sunday morning and came across a washed up canister. Thinking it might be chemicals or explosives or whatever, he peered at the lid to find it inscribed with the name of a certain local Crematorium followed by some late gentlemans name.
    Taking a chance he unscrewed the lid prior to taking it to the local police station, only to find it full of stones, it was obviously intended to follow it’s occupants mortal remains into the waves, but such is the power of the sea!!
    So where to you want to be tipped out then, is this a service that DX provide, have you checked with them before making your will, when that container gets opened, there ain’t much left, and I can’t think of many cinder paths around DX that would accomodate it.
    Lets not be morbid and look forward to a good, schoolkid friendly day out on Friday, with a lot of imput from our mates in the USAF.

    Theres always the tank compound……..

    in reply to: 68 years ago today…… #1236650
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Does anyone have any information on a P/O Mathews, a Spitfire pilot, shot down and killed during the BoB; I seem to remember he baled out, but died of his injuries, but may be wrong.

    in reply to: LACAB GR.8 Doryphore #1236832
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Well I think it’s not a bad effort, always assuming that you have built it from the crashed remains of freighter, (you just happened to be a passenger on), in the middle of a very sandy place, that gets quite warm during the day, and has as part of it’s (oil well equipment) cargo, a seemingly unlimited supply of pressed dates…

    in reply to: Spit Vs Dornier – 3.8.1942 Help- Andy? PeterA? #1167062
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Rawlings Fighter squadrons of the RAF puts the Squadron at Kings Cliffe from June to October 1942 with a period at West Malling in August 1942. No exact dates are given so I expect West Malling was a detachment? There is no mention of Docking.

    Spitfire The History gives the following:

    BM208 M46 37MU 8-3-42 485S 27-3 FAAC 16-12 ROS FTR ops 4-4-43 FH361.15 (Note: No mention of service with 303 Squadron.)

    I can’t understand all of it and my eyes aren’t good enough today to trawl through for the abbreviations. It seems BM208 was with 485 Squadron from March 42. I’ll leave someone else to translate the rest.

    Fighter Command Losses records BM208 as still being with 485 Squadron at the time of its loss on 4-4-43 when Sgt. H J Oxley failed to return from a Ramrod to Caen during which he had an engagement with an Fw190.

    Hope this helps Ben.

    Regards,

    kev35

    FAAC , flying accident catagory AC, ROS, repaired on site, FTR , failed to return (on ops) FH, flying hours (airframe).

    FTR, 4/4/43, not 5/3/45.

    in reply to: The "This is NOT a Merlin" eBay Thread! #1168955
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    As far as I can recall this was removed during a previous overhaul, and was not in the engine when it crashed. However, I saw this on his stall at an RREC event in 2007 and it was being advertised as Griffon! Oops

    Indeed this is possible, as I have a tail wheel tyre from this A/C, also removed during overhaul; I seem to remember a member of this forum, was disposing of these items on behalf of one of the factions up at Bruntingthorpe, but there is no getting away from the fact that they are linked to a sad event, and that on their own (without history) would be worth less. (thats worth less , not worthless).

    in reply to: The "This is NOT a Merlin" eBay Thread! #1170200
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    And the fact that it’s from a relatively recent fatal crash.

    in reply to: Duxford 8th August #1171908
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I believe they do a family membership at £98; 2 adults and any number of children under 16 (hope some one gets this one).

    in reply to: Olympix #1172339
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Is this the earliest example of corporate sponsorship ?

    in reply to: Where was the Spitfire last night? #1176615
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Slightly ironic as there was a piece on Spitfires this morning on BBC news, also featuring Carolyn Grace,and the voice over said that she was off to display at an outside concert….

    in reply to: Spitfire Canopy Rails for Static #1178550
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Here are a couple of photos (poor quality) and a couple of drgs, showing the canopy rail, and arrangement thereof; the 2nd drg is a section at the front of the canopy assy, and ironically it shows the packer as being thinner there than the section (drg1)further aft.

    in reply to: Spitfire Canopy Rails for Static #1179289
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    So there is 2 tenths difference over a run of about 40″?

    in reply to: Spitfire Canopy Rails for Static #1179361
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Just for my edification then, the kidney bean sliders bear against the doubler of the canopy rail (through which the rail is rivetted to the skin) and the closed part of the rail forward of F11.

    The rail is parallel with the skin at all times, and the outer profile of the fuselage changes shape, becoming progressively narrower the further rearward it goes, but the knuckle line remains a constant dimension despite the drg showing there to be only .15″ tolerance between the inside of the canopy frame , and the outside of the rail.

    in reply to: Typhoon in a cellar….!! #1180831
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    It’s obviously the new forum project, the stub wings are mine, the exhausts are clearly from Graham’s Spitoon, and if I’m not mistaken the prop blades are Merlin Pete’s handywork….

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,986 total)