dark light

hawkdriver05

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,012 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Classics compaired F1 and F-5 #2550533
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    I’m thinkin the F1 had more power….better weapons systems……

    in reply to: F-15 breaks up in flight. #2552342
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Was just watching the story of the F-15 grounding on BBC “America”……..pretty informative…except…….they were showing wonderful video footage of an F-14 launching off a carrier. Nice.

    in reply to: F-15 breaks up in flight. #2552351
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    ALL F-15s in USAF are now grounded till further notice….

    in reply to: No Colossus, Majestic or Hermes class CVL #2044094
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Also, remember, had there been no Brit CVLs……then Clem would have ended up being a somewhat different ship. The French learned alot from operating Arromanches.

    in reply to: Yuck! #2552794
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    My dad HATED when guys did that in his plane! He started in F-100s, then went to A-7s and ended up flying F-16s.

    in reply to: No Colossus, Majestic or Hermes class CVL #2044135
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Could the “Buc” operate off Clemeneau?

    in reply to: French military sales. why so unsuccessful? #2553020
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    The Leclerc has been positioned at a much lower weight category than its contempories, such as the Leopard 2, Challenger 2 and Abrams. This nowadays has little benefit, but does limit its ability to use heavy armour. It isn’t really any harder to spot, and there is a lot of scepticism on the autoloader. It makes the life of the gunner harder, especially in the case of the autoloader failing. Also, with modern sighting devices, and overhead weapons systems, the loader can be very useful, keeping an eye out for bad guys, allowing the commander to focus on command tasks, and helping the gunner protect the vehicle. The Leclerc hasn’t done particularly well in competitions internationally, losing out mostly to the Leopard 2, not just on cost grounds, but on capability and armour protection.

    AMEN!!!!! Went to war in the M-1A1 in 91……….having the 4th crewman around was a VERY big help when doing such things as maint. and all the other little “details” that every military unit has to do. And the autoloader is just something else to break- and usualy at the WORST moment.

    in reply to: C-17 faces the axe #2554294
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Pentagon seems to be playing a game of “chicken”……..not requesting any and hoping congress will authorise 10 or so a year on its own……..

    in reply to: IJN carriers #2044849
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    AAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!:D

    in reply to: v-22 #2555314
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    EXACTLY!!!!! Its allmost criminal that the CH-46 was kept in service so long. Especialy when a perfectly good helo could have been in service in the early to mid 90s!

    in reply to: v-22 #2555599
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    US Marines have had an EH101 equivalent since 1966. The latest version is called CH-53E.

    CH-53 is a much larger a/c than the EH101……….the 101 was originaly seen as a SeaKing replacement by the RN.

    in reply to: v-22 #2504347
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    I guess the big question that could be asked is – what would you have in place of Osprey? Now I am not defending Osprey at all, I am just asking, what could have been bought instead. Personally, I suspect you could probably have bought quite a few UH-1Ys or even a couple of CH-53s for the price of one Osprey. This might have been more militarily effective too…

    Its called the EH101.

    in reply to: After the Vulcan.. What's next? #1311523
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Someone should build an exact replica of R100….lol!

    in reply to: Dambusters filming at Scampton #1311729
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Will Guy Gibson have a dog in this movie?

    in reply to: v-22 #2504494
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    I really hpoe not also! My big problem with the V-22 is the main mission its being assigned. Making it THE primary assault transport in the USMC. This craft will be hostile fire in a big way…….lets hope it can take battle damage as good as its predecessors. Another problem could be the differences in performance between it and the Marine Corp’s rotory wing aircraft. It is much faster than the good ol Cobra…….so Some new tactics would seem in order. But, all in all, Im glad (for now) I wont have to fly in them……again….REALLY hope Im wrong bout this.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,012 total)