I wish they’d hurry up with the Il-112V, that program’s been going for ages. As for the Russo-Indian MTA, I’ve gotta wonder when we’re ever going to see that. The Il-76MD-90 and Il-76MF are the most “safe” programs for now it seems, in terms of we’ll actually see them come about relatively soon.
Hopefully some of those new Helos will include some Ka-60s and Ansats to replace all those Mi-2s.
The Ka-60 is something of a moribund program at the moment. Problems with producing an engine for a helicopter in that “medium” class (the Ka-60 was meant to be a new Mi-4, after all). As I understand it they’re still keen to order up a Ka-60U variant for advanced training (along with the Ansat for basic) but I don’t think we’ll see any movement on the Ka-60 front for a while. It’s a shame.
As for new helicopters generally, I’m pretty sure I read an article that the Air Force will be getting Mi-8MTV-5s recently.
Have read a report that stated that the T-95 will be revealed to the world in 2009 and enter production.
The report didn’t specifically say “T-95” (I’d be surprised if the tank ends up being called that) but yeah, I read that report too.
It’d be nice if we could be sure it’ll happen, but as always with Russia (well, the defence procurement of all nations, it seems, but bigtime in Russia) we’ve got no way of knowing whether it’ll actually occur, or only a fraction of that. Previous State Arms Programs have been called “failures” by the (Russian) press, after all, the potential remains for this one to fail too.
What I would prefer is an announcement about what has happened in the past few years, rather than what will (in reality, might) happen in the next few years.
Take for example the “Rogatka” upgrade for Russian Army T-80Bs and T-72Bs – IIRC, last year they were saying something like 150 tanks would be modernized in 2007 – AFAIK, that has not even begun.
They might have more success if they opened up the Russia Stabilization Fund (ie. the vast-majority-of-oil-profits fund) to the Defence Ministry and got into rearmament big time- but then, that’d kind of defeat the purpose of the fund.
Good news, is it known if these aircraft will be new built or retrofits from Su-27P/S?
Given the Su-35 is so substantially different from a “normal” Su-27S, I can’t imagine they could retrofit an Su-27 to that standard and have it be an “Su-27SM2” in any meaningful sense of the designation.
From what I’ve heard, the RuAF plans to get rid of the ’29 altogether. I dont have a source, but thats the rumor…
The inability for the RuAF to follow through with its plans is quite frustrating. People have been talking about the RuAF upgrading a portion of its MiG-29 fleet for over a decade, and nothing’s happened, even though the upgrade itself has been pretty much set for years (with some small changes, like the N019 radar upgrade being replaced with a Zhuk-M in the most recent news) – meanwhile, you’ve got regiments receiving Su-27SMs pretty regularly and in substantial numbers (for the RuAF, that is), and that upgrade’s only been around since, what, 2002, 2003?
It’s the same story with the Mi-24PN, somewhat – the first aircraft were delivered in 2003, and a handful more after that, and I read in Jan 08 AFM that funding had been diverted from the Mi-24PN program to the Mi-28N, so the upgrade wasn’t proceeding very fast (if at all). I suppose that’s a decision I can understand (out with the old, in with the new) but the Mi-24 force needs some night capability in the meantime.
All this of course I’m saying in the context of reports of Russia ordering Su-27SM2s – I wouldn’t be surprised if nothing happens in this regard. The Su-34 seems to be the only aircraft getting any “love” these days.
I’m sure MiG would appreciate some MiG-35 orders, given the low chance it has in the Indian comp.
Kh-101 seems to have superceded both the Kh-555 and Kh-65.
How do you mean “superceded”? The Kh-555, AFAIK, has been in service for a while on modernized Tu-95MSMs (the upgrading of Tu-95MS16s to Tu-95MSMs is, according to Jane’s pretty much complete) and there’s been various articles referring to the firing of conventional cruise missiles in exercises, which I understood to be the Kh-555, seeing as how its a less ambitious program than the Kh-101.
It’s also likely to be the first recipient of the license produced (by UOMZ) Thales ‘Damocles’ targeting/reconnaissance pod.
I never heard about that? UOMZ got a licence to make the Damocles? What, for use by the VVS? What happened to SAPSAN-E? Or is this the next step in Russia’s partnership with Thales, like the Catherine-FC thermal imager is now being used on Russian Army T-90s?
Khrizantema-S (AT-15) has been in service with the Russian Army for several years now – 2003/2004, if I remember correctly. Kornet has been in service for longer than that.
Hmmm? The original AL-41 was going to have 175kN of thrust (with afterburner). Development effort has been put into the AL-41F1A (or something along those lines) – a smaller engine with thrust more along the lines of the F-22As engines. The very-powerful Article 117S engines of the Su-35BM are related to it.
(The PAK FA won’t be large enough to take advantage of a pair of 175kN engines)
It will also get AL-31FM1 engines, and of course the airframe repair/upgrade is very important for keeping the Su-27 fleet viable into the future.
What’s the current status of the Mi-24 fleet in Russia? How many do they have? Mostly Hind-E or Hind-F?
Is the Mi-24PN program progressing?
I think it’s mostly Mi-24P, though I have no way to be sure. Given that the Mi-24PN upgrade program is (naturally) Mi-24P dependent, it’d make the most sense.
Mi-24PNs were delivered in small quantities a few years ago (I have the pics of five of them arriving), I have no information however as to the rate of delivery since then, if any.
Those were the original plans, but they were abandoned years ago as being simply too expensive to justify. Equipping every Su-25SM with a Kop’yo in the nose? Not worth it.
(the above small paragraph doesn’t really do justice to the upgrade – there’s an extensive interview about the actual upgrade I posted here ages ago, it might still be around)
EDIT: Here it is, I posted it five years ago.
Wow, long time for the upgrade to happen when you think about it. It specifically mentions the AF deciding against a radar, though Sukhoi thought it needed it.
Thanks – I had seen the first pic, but not the second one, shows the MFD in a lot more detail. It doesn’t look like the typical Russian MFI series.
It’s still strange that the Su-25UBM is going to be a new production aircraft – I guess because Ulan-Ude always built the two-seaters it made sense that the future of the aircraft would be the two-seater model (well the Su-25T/TM is based on the Su-25UB anyway).
Anyone got cockpit pictures of either the Su-25SM or Su-25UBM?
I’m not sure Sukhoi’s Su-24M upgrade package beat the Su-24M2 upgrade – most sources I’ve read have consistently referred to the “Su-24M2” as being the standard Russia’s Su-24Ms are being upgraded to.
(are FENCER-A/B/Cs being upgraded as well, or just FENCER-Ds?)
The Zalson-M was originally developed for the MiG-31M. It was a modernized PESA like the Zalson. I’ve not heard any evidence the MiG-31BM is to be equipped with an AESA – I heard it was to receive the Zalson-AM – a modernized Zalson-A (from the MiG-31B/BS).