I’m pretty sure they’re both in production. I’m more sure about the 2S25 Sprut-SD than the BMPT, but the 2S25 Sprut-SD is part of the big re-equipment of the VDV that’s going on. BMD-4, BTR-DZ (replacement of BTR-D, based on BMD-3 chassis) and variants thereof (like medevac BMM-1D, etc) and 2S25.
Russia set to buy 69 Topol-M missile systems by 2015
15:18 | 13/ 07/ 2006
Print version
VOLGOGRAD, July 13 (RIA Novosti) – Russia is planning to purchase 69 silo-based and mobile Topol-M ballistic missile systems in the next decade, the defense minister said Thursday.
“We are planning to buy 69 [Topol-M] systems by 2015,” Sergei Ivanov said at a meeting with defense industry officials in the Volgograd Region.
Ivanov, who is also a deputy prime minister, said the defense ministry was also planning to procure 60 Iskander-M tactical ballistic missile systems to equip five missile brigades, 57 Sprut-SD self-propelled guns, 499 Rakushka airborne armored personnel carriers, and several Bereg mobile coastal artillery systems.
The defense minister earlier said that Russia’s 2006 defense order would total $9 billion and increase by 20% to 303.7 bln rubles ($11.2 bln) in 2007.
However, Ivanov reiterated that defense industry enterprises should not rely solely on increasing state orders and must rapidly develop production of dual-purpose and civilian goods to stay competitive.
Rakushka = BTR-DZ. The BMD-4 has been in production from before this, that’s why I assume it wasn’t mentioned. All BMD-3s are being upgraded to BMD-4s as well (since it’s a turret replacement).
Note that’s enough to re-equip two of the four VDV divisions. The other two are being converted to lighter and more mobile helicopter + parachute & mountain rifle forces.
The Kornet are good to 5.5km.
The BMPT is equipped with Ataka-T ATGMs, not Kornets. The original BMPT had four Kornets in a single box on one side of the turret, but then they changed the turret significantly.
I suspect the AL-41F1 will have more thrust than the AL-41F1A, since I think the latter is an interim?
Of course, the AL-41 variant powering the T-50, possible production Su-34s (in the interim, likely to be powered by AL-31FM1s or M2s) and the Su-35BM (as reported) isn’t as huge as the original AL-41F- it’s the AL-41F1 (AL-41F1A?), rated at IIRC ~142-145kN with afterburner instead of 175kN.
Since the Su-34/Su-35BM/T-50 isn’t going to be as huge as the MiG 1.44, this isn’t surprising.
The limit of 40mm calibre for the rocket motor is very limiting. The PG-7VL rocket which has the 105mm warhead later used on the RPG-29 has a range of only 200m. When fired from the RPG-29 its effective range is 500m+
Actually the PG-7VL is the 93mm monobloc HEAT, the PG-7VR is the 105mm tandem. The RPG-7V2 allows for more effective firing of the PG-7VR, OG-7V and TBG-7V because it has a “UP-7V” sighting device that somehow functions along with the standard sight to extend the range.
The Su-34 is also optimized for low-level penetrations in the way that an Su-30MK or similar “regular” Flanker isn’t. It has some sort of “gust-alleviation” system for the pilot, IIRC.
Those tandem RPG-7 are interesting, some are probably Bulgarian, at least one may be a PG-7VR or copy thereof.
PAK FA “mastered” in 2009, First regiment of Su-34s will be deployed to the Far East MD, regiment at Komsomol’sk-on-Amur re-equipped fully with Su-27SMs.
Fifth Generation Airplanes Possibly Will Be Mastered in 2009
In the coming years, Far East aviation units of the air force and air defense forces will receive new airplanes, Russia’s air force commander-in-chief, General of the Army Vladimir Mikhaylov, reported to journalists in an interview on Sunday.
“The air regiment at Dzemgi outside of Komsomol’sk-on-Amur already has been reequipped with the new Su-27SM airplanes,” Mikhaylov said.
“This airplane in all parameters is almost three times more effective than its predecessor, the Su-27. Right now we are beginning series production of the Su-34, in the Far East the Su-24 will be fully replaced by the Su-34 at one of the 11th air force and air defense army regiments,” he added.
Russia’s air force commander-in-chief noted that at the present time, fifth generation airplanes are being developed which for the time being they call the PAK FA – the future aviation complex of tactical aviation.
“We plan to master it as soon as 2009. This program has been financed in full, it’s in the hands of the manufacturers alone,” Mikhaylov noted.
The increase of military financing allows not only the purchase of new military equipment, but also to resolve the military’s social problems. According to Vladimir Mikhaylov, in 1 — 2 years there will not be any families left without apartments in the Far East air force and air defense forces. Inasmuch as by that time, a system for mortgage lending will begin operation.
Source: 14.08.06, RIA Novosti
Clearly?
Yes. It’s not an RPG-27, that much is certain going from the RPG-27 round picture I posted. It can’t be a PG-7VR. There’s an RPG-29 launcher in the display (further up or down a row, you’ll have to see a video: Link) and to me, comparing it to PG-29V rounds commonly displayed, it’s identical.
An RPG-28 is a 125mm calibre disposable rocket launcher with a longer range than the RPG-27. Heavier warhead, longer range = larger rocket motor.
I haven’t seen one so I don’t know what the round looks like, but in any event, that Hezbollah would have them is even less likely than RPG-29, which we know they have.
Obviously a PG-29V when you have never seen an RPG-28…
Then show me an RPG-28 round. If it’s identical to a PG-29V give or take 20mm extra width, you may be correct, but I see no reason to think so based on the evidence at hand, which again includes an RPG-29 launcher itself.
One tank per day is pretty high considering the scale of the engagement and the vaunted heavy armor of Merkava tanks and related vehicles- especially when your opponent are lightly equipped guerillas.
Please, keep this stuff out of the thread. This is just a thread for posting the news and discussion, don’t start a massive tangent. We all know how to identify hype and exaggeration, don’t we?
Also, does it really matter when RPG-29 entered service? Syria was reported as buying some years before all this Hezbollah crap started, where Hezbollah got them from is obvious, as far as I’m concerned.
All we need to know is that poorly employed tanks everywhere should be frightened.
Sorry, but I disagree.
The RPG-7s rocket comes in two parts that are screwed together before launch, but the RPG-29 comes packed in the rear portion of the launcher and is not assembled for launch.
The RPG-29 is a reloadable weapon. As for saying it’s not assembled at launch- actually the rocket being assembled makes a lot of sense from my POV- it’s a big fat round, and would be very unwieldy to carry as a single piece- but whether it’s assembled at launch or at the factory (since as we know the warhead itself is largely identical to the RPG-27 and PG-7VR, all Bazalt need do is produce the tandem 105mm warhead and then attach it as necessary to PG-7VR, RPG-27 and PG-29V rear sections) that is clearly a PG-29V rear section.
The rocket in Vaiars photo is the rocket from one of the disposable launchers sitting next to it.
Those are Fagot ATGM tubes.
http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/4751/104617140tl7.jpg
Just as there are 105mm warheads for the RPG-7 that have the same penetration performance as the RPG-29, there are also heavy disposable RPGs (RPG-26, 27, and 28) that also use both heavy warheads and large diameter warheads. From memory the RPG_27 has a 105mm warhead and the RPG-28 has a 125mm warhead of larger diameter than the RPG-29.
I’ve never heard of the RPG-28, but in any event, you can see in this RPG-27 pic that it’s definitely not an RPG-27 round:

Notice how the rear rocket motor section is much smaller in diameter in totality compared to the warhead, in comparison to the round seen at the Israeli display. It’s obviously a PG-29V.
If you go to http://www.rusarms.ru and click on the army products it will download a pdf version of the website. If you look for RPG-27 you will see a cross section of the RPG-27 in its launcher. If you look carefully you will see a waist between the rocket motor and the warhead. If you look at the specs you will also see the calibre of the weapon is 105mm… the same as the RPG-29. You will also notice that the weapons beside the rocket in Vaiar are the right size to be RPG-27s.
Vaguely, but as you can see from the close-ups, they’re ATGMs, not disposable RPGs- but in any event, there is no “waist” in the round on the Israeli display, just empty space.
EDIT: and as Vaiar mentioned, the RPG-29 launcher itself is clearly seen in the video of the same display, which I’ve seen. It’s a PG-29V.
This pic is a good look at the launcher and the round- quite high-resolution:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2b/RPG-29.JPG
The gap between the rear section and the actual warhead is extremely visible.
See also here in general:
BTW Vaiar is wrong. His picture of the so called PG-29V is not a PG-29V. The whole reason for going to a 105mm calibre launcher in the RPG-29 was to make the rocket motor the same calibre as the warhead. If you look at his photo again you will see it has a narrow waist between the warhead and the rocket motor. The large Disposable launchers sitting next to this round have such rockets… the RPG-29 does not.
Look as these photos of the RPG-29s rockets and the picture Vaiar posted again… they are different:
As I said earlier in the thread:
No, that’s an RPG-29 projectile in its totality. The front part is the warhead, the rear is the motor with the pop-out control surfaces. They connect.
The reason it looks different is beause they’re seperate- there’s no narrow waist between the warhead and rocket motor, the rocket motor simply hasn’t been attached to the warhead. It’s a PG-29V, of that I have no doubt.
hi,the 1st:KOPS(Kombinirovannaya Obzorno Pritselnaya Sistem)=FLIR
The Mi-28A doesn’t have a FLIR, that’s a daytime only system.