dark light

Vympel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 1,357 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2604467
    Vympel
    Participant

    Having excellent pilots who fly all the time isn’t as important right now as maintaining the technological base and manufacturing capability of the defense sector. You can train up good pilots off a core force of those who are extremely competent later.

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2560572
    Vympel
    Participant

    the picture of the cockpit is from MAKS-2001 there is no reason to think that series produced birds will look like that 5 years later. The Su-27SM cockpit was shown on Vesti about a year ago and was rather sweet looking.

    I’ve seen pictures of the Su-27SM cockpit- it’s got three really nice LCD MFDs, but the HUD is still nowhere near the level of that on the Yak-130 and MiG-29M2. Unless they’ve changed it?

    Same with the MiG-29SMT actually, the HUD is never the best they’ve done.

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2560869
    Vympel
    Participant

    For Vympel 🙂

    Cool- what’s that from btw?

    As for UOMZ- I had their development of the sensor suite for the series-Mi-28N in mind when I said the above- as for the radar, it’s quite likely they’ll simply bring the Mi-28N into service without a radar, and add the radar later on later production versions. If the AH-64 is any indicator, you don’t need a mast-mounted radar for every aircraft anyway.

    Which company developed “Tor” anyway?

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2560871
    Vympel
    Participant

    I sincerely doubt you people would find much about Platan and Su-32 radar on open press, while Russians like to promote and show their export items a lot (maybe some users like IAF are not that happy or press the russians to do not do so, ask Harry), they products, and Su-32 enter this category are purely and 100% “for home” and most info is not released.

    I have to inform, that KAB-500S integration and evaluations were over last February at 929 GLITS, the bomb was introduced formally on the Su-32 weapons load. Other weapons that will be integrated in the future is the UPAB-1500 glide-bomb.

    A pair of new missiles are being developed right now at Tactical Missiles Corporation, the Kh-25MA, a very advanced derivative of the old Kh-25MR, that uses a millimetric wave radar of Phazotron-NIIR called “PSM”, Phazotron is pushing hard at TMC for introducing the seaker and getting the missile ready but the situation is not that clear, one that is a little clear is about the new Kh-25MS, a new “GPS/GLONASS guided” AS-10, that uses the same PSN-2001 multi-channel GPS/GLONASS receptor. Supposedly both missiles would have export versions, and I guess IAF maybe would be interested (I think a “Brimstone-ski” would be nice for the MiG-29 and the Mascot :)…It would be interesting if the IAF have not yet placed a buy order for the KAB-500S-E, because MKB Kompass, the developer of the PSN-2001 said some time ago, that the Su-30MKI Mk3 integration with the bomb is “pretty straight-forward”…Su-30MK2 should be also easy to integrate.

    Platan have also be mentioned for the Yak-130 some times ago.

    SAPSAN-E at the moment (AFAIK I could be wrong) is just a prototype in testing, and most export users seem to be taking other directions (IAF with Litening-2, RMAF with Thales delivered toys /maybe Damocles/, AlgAF good would know what…)…maybe for little countries like Yemen and so…let give it some time.

    I have to said, I’m NOT impressed with the last “Bort 48” cockpit of the Su-27IB, it just looks like a “crash-update” of an old cockpit…damnation, they even uses the same damn SILS-27 or derivative HUD of the Su-27SM and not the new RKPB HUD with UFCP that the MiG-29K of IN will use!…the MFDs also show little resolution (no MFI-68-I5?) and the MMI looks dumb…let the export users go with the best russian kit and the Indian developed Graphic Microprocessor, or directly ask Thales and let them made the magic for you 😀

    See, it’s too bad we don’t hear all this information in the standard press. I mean, I’d heard of the KAB-500S but I had no idea as to its progress.

    I have to agree on the Bort 48 cockpit, didn’t look nearly as cool as the MiG-29M2 front/rear cockpit setup, for example.

    Series production might be different, fingers crossed.

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2561675
    Vympel
    Participant

    I was thinking that as well- it’s just that I hadn’t heard of a “SAPSAN” pod seperate from “SAPSAN-E”. UOMZ seems to be doing well lately (series version of Mi-28N and all that), and I don’t know who makes “Platan”.

    As it is, I don’t know if the enigmatic “Platan” pod even has a FLIR. None of the little I’ve read about it (mostly in reference to how accurate the Su-34 is with it) seems to state it, unless you take the all-weather day/night references to mean that (which is a bit of a stretch, considering the Su-24 could be said to do the same, IIRC).

    Just looking at that close-up of the Tu-134Sh- is that bulge on the ventral side just underneath the radome standard on the Tu-134?

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2561974
    Vympel
    Participant

    I remember seeing pictures of the “Tu-134Sh”, a Tu-134 specially fitted with the Su-34’s avionics as a test-bed, including quite obviously, it’s nose. I guess maybe from that they decided the B004 was a “lemon”.

    Bars-34, anyone?

    Anyone got any information on the Platan pod?

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2562395
    Vympel
    Participant

    I’m still waiting for a picture of the Su-34 equipped with whatever targeting pods it will use to make the most of it’s weaponry options. It hasn’t got an intergral sensor outfit like the Su-24’s Kaira system, so I’ve got to wonder what they’re using now.

    Of course, the B004 radar goes without saying, but they can’t use just that.

    in reply to: Submarine aircraft carrier? #2059343
    Vympel
    Participant

    The Japanese did one. America and Russia studied them in the Cold War.

    They both decided it was a stupid idea 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2059370
    Vympel
    Participant

    If there were, the guy who took them was shot 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2564293
    Vympel
    Participant

    If there were, the guy who took them was shot 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2059542
    Vympel
    Participant

    They’ll need at least that many to replace the Delta IV + Delta III boomers in service. I don’t know if it was put in this thread, but the next Borey’s name will be Vladimir Monomach (don’t know if the spelling is correct).

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2565639
    Vympel
    Participant

    They’ll need at least that many to replace the Delta IV + Delta III boomers in service. I don’t know if it was put in this thread, but the next Borey’s name will be Vladimir Monomach (don’t know if the spelling is correct).

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2059841
    Vympel
    Participant

    Where’s the seventh Delta IV? It may not have a name as far as we know, but it hasn’t been decommissioned, to my knowledge.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2570082
    Vympel
    Participant

    Where’s the seventh Delta IV? It may not have a name as far as we know, but it hasn’t been decommissioned, to my knowledge.

    in reply to: Iskander-E 'designed to counter Western TMDs' #1817795
    Vympel
    Participant

    The JED article “Bolt from the Blue” talks about Russian SRBMs like Tochka, Tochka-U, Oka (SS-23 SPIDER) and Iskander-E/Iskander-M/Tender in detail. In that article, it stated that Iskander-M was only an interim system until Tender was completed. Now the same organization is saying that “Tender” was actually dropped as a name in favour of “Iskander-M”. Weird. Don’t know what to believe.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 1,357 total)