dark light

Vympel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,357 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2011600
    Vympel
    Participant

    he Europeans joined it for their own benefit and when they got it they left. Leaving the Russians look like fools.

    What did they get out of it? PiBu’s article says that the Europeans were forced out due to changes in Russian law.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2348020
    Vympel
    Participant

    We do know that the Zhuk-ME of the MiG-29SMTs originally intended for Algeria were modified for Russian use, as were the planes generally. There’s no way the MiG-29K of the Russian Navy is going to be using an “E” type radar for export customers.

    India certainly modified their MiG-29Ks with some other kit, but a Zhuk-ME is a Zhuk-ME, AFAIK. But yes, it’ll be a marginal performance difference, not major.

    Agreed.
    The Russian Mig-29K is not a cosher unit, like the Su-30M2 and Su-35S.
    Big different is also the price, i have a feeling that this is partial a state hand out to the troubled Mig RAC.

    The Navy needs these planes. Upgraded Su-33s won’t last as long, nor are they as capable for the intended role (i.e. full-on multi-role advanced fighter). And the more planes Admiral Kuznetsov gets, the better.

    But yes, MiG does need more orders. I hope they get some MiG-35 success, from the VVS if no one else.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2348785
    Vympel
    Participant

    Awesome picture

    Why have the rocket pods been … photoshopped? Or are they dummy pods? Huh?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2353995
    Vympel
    Participant

    Napo was finnish retooling last year.
    Probably has a more modern prod lines vs Sokol (N. Novgorod) plant by now.
    It could also mean they both do Mig-31BM upgrade..

    Just my two cent.

    NAPO’s a Sukhoi plant. Anything is possible, but its not likely. NAPO has their hands full building Su-34s, let alone upgrading MiG-31s.

    If anything, this claim of Blue 01 being at all recent is probably erroneous – pictures of a flying Blue 02 MiG-31BM have been around for months.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2354118
    Vympel
    Participant

    NAPO builds Su-34s and upgrades Su-24Ms. They don’t have anything to do with the MiG-31 or its upgrade, AFAIK.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2362064
    Vympel
    Participant

    What insults? They stated they’d build a fleet of carriers, now they’ve had to ditch that plan. Whats so insulting about that?

    There’s a big difference between they Navy not starting on a fleet of carriers because there’s no money in the budget and a fighter not getting X-many radars because of the budget. One has nothing to do with the other.

    The same will happen with this five radar set-up. It will be quietly abandoned and when bought up they will say it is for the next batch or some other such excuse. I’ve seen this all before a hundred times over.

    Uh – when?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2334329
    Vympel
    Participant

    sounds awfully optomistic.. 4 years until 2015, and Sukhoi is still doing testing on Su-35 let alone serial production. From now, they’ll have to produce 12.5 fighters annually. a rate that not even the Su-34 is at right now, which is in its nth year of production.

    The Su-34 is only in its third year of serial production (2010). And it was built at NAPO (which recently completed an upgrade of its facilities so that production could be sped up and expanded), not KNAAPO. The experience of the Su-34 really has nothing to do with the Su-35S. Though the potential for series production to be delayed somewhat is always likely to some degree.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335423
    Vympel
    Participant

    So you want to tell us that an engine fitted to a fighter in 2010 will lack a FADEC? The Russians must be backwards by a LARGE margin!
    Honestly a FADEC system for the AL.-31F was already tested as early as the late 80s and it is most likely fitted to all newer variants of the AL-31. The AL-41F1 offers an improved control system in comparison to the AL-41F1S, that doesn’t mean it’s no FADEC!

    You’re not wrong – the AL-31FM1s fitted to Su-27SM and Su-34s are also digital:-

    http://www.salut.ru/Section.php?SectionId=18

    Digital full-authority engine regulator instead of analog one;

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335426
    Vympel
    Participant

    Incorrectly translated text.

    I’m pretty sure the Saturn NPO’s own website wouldn’t stuff up the difference between a digital and analog system. I mean, do you really think they meant to say “and the engine has a totally rocking analog engine control system”?

    I doubt it.

    Well you shouldn’t:-

    http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/6320/fadec.th.jpg

    And here’s KNAAPO’s website, Su-35S section:-

    It has a variable low-pressure compressor, all-axis TVC-nozzles, new digital engine system and inlet control system.

    And you can get the brochure from there too.

    Did they stuff up the translation too?

    http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/products/military/su-35.wbp

    In addition to all of this evidence, as scorpion notes, this claim that the most modern engine Russia has in series production (or about to be, I don’t know if the Su-35S engines are being built yet, just the order for 96 of them) doesn’t have FADEC is pretty hard to believe.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335524
    Vympel
    Participant

    Can’t read any of that, of course 🙂

    Why the discrepancy with what NPO Saturn says? The Su-35S brochure, too, says the engines are FADEC.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2335543
    Vympel
    Participant

    Source re: differences between AL-41F1-S and AL-41F1?

    And I’m pretty sure the Article 117S has a digital control system:-

    http://www.npo-saturn.ru/?pid=156

    Such high parameters, on retention of the overall dimensions and weight, are attained due to application of an absolutely new high-tech low pressure compressor with increased air flow and efficiency, a new high-performance turbine of increased reliability with an improved blade cooling system and digital engine control system integrated with the aircraft control system.

    What is a “plasma ignition system”, anyway?

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1799791
    Vympel
    Participant

    I don’t get what he’s talking about re: “the technological gap”.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2348938
    Vympel
    Participant

    Modernized Su-33!

    What are we looking at in that video? They’re not all modernized Su-33s. I saw what looked like an Su-30 on that factory floor. And was that cockpit only equipped with one MFD? Which fighter was that? Surely it’d get three like the Su-27SMs.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1800111
    Vympel
    Participant

    While the GPS constellation is getting expanded Glonass has perpetual trouble just maintaining adequate numbers for global coverage. Maybe India should have bet on Galileo instead for its military needs.

    Launch failures happen. Its not a big deal:-

    But the general director of M2M Electronics, a subcontractor specializing in microelectronics for the Glonass programme, said the failure to launch the satellites was “no great tragedy.”

    Evgeny Belyanko told Russian state-owned news channel Rossiya 24 that existing satellites already covered all of Russia, had good coverage up to polar latitudes, and “perhaps not quite as good” coverage of the equatorial region. “Therefore the absence of these three satellites … will not have any serious consequences.

    There are currently 26 Glonass satellites in orbit, many of them launched by the Proton-M carrier. Twenty of the 26 are in working condition; two satellites are on standby; and four satellites are under maintenance, Belyanko said.

    GLONASS has been steadily expanded for years now, and newer model satellites are coming in soon – I’m not sure what ‘perpetual trouble’ you’re talking about. But Galileo? Yeah, lets bet on a satellite constellation that doesn’t even exist. What a deal! 🙂

    At the end of the day, its a temporary setback to full coverage. If they’re desperate for it, the 2 standby satellites can be brought in at any time.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2019847
    Vympel
    Participant

    IF by completed you mean hull was unfinished and “frozen” in hopes of future completion, then yes.

    Well I put it in quotation marks precisely because I wasn’t sure if that counted as completion. How old is that picture?

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,357 total)