Originally posted by Indian1973
can these new fuel tanks be fitted on older Mig29s like in service
with the IAF ? would remarkably extend their CAP endurance.
It’s highly likely. Of course, you could take the route Yemen is going and get MiG-29SMTs but without the increased fuel tankage, but with the new external tanks.
And rear:
Test:
“Peru has acquired an unspecified number of R-77s to equip its small force of three MiG-29SEs, purchased from Russia in 1998. Reports in 2000 stated that Peru ordered 30 missiles for evaluation, but it is believed only 12 live weapons and two training rounds (plus just six missile launch rails) were delivered. Jane’s sources state that the Peruvian Air Force is unable to field any operational ‘Alamos’ because of a Russian refusal to supply essential spares for the missile’s Oka ground calibration equipment. Russia is refusing to support Peru’s MiG-29 force in general, because its ‘Fulcrum-A’ aircraft were acquired from Belarus and not from an ‘officially sanctioned’ source.”
From Jane’s Air Launched Weapons 41, the AA-12 ADDER (R-77) entry.
If the Su-27SM incorporates a signficant radar upgrade in future (specifically the ‘Pero’ passive electronically scanned phased array antenna designed for the purpose) it’ll be almost as good as the Su-27M/Su-35, though the latter will retain advantage in warload, range, and overall performance.
The Su-27IB designation is the only one where I think the VVS is being stupid- as a strike bomber and successor to the Su-24, Su-32 or Su-34 makes much more sense (the old even/odd number rule). Though there are anomalies:
– MiG-27: it’s a bomber, not a fighter- why the odd number?
– Tu-95: this name stuck for some reason. It’s actually supposed to be Tu-20
Any others?
The naval Su-32FN was abandoned years ago anyway- it never got off the ground- except for the name.
Note, the Su-27SK (Upgraded) b/n 305 is also the demonstrator for the Su-27SM upgrade program for the VVS (12 Su-27s to be upgraded in 2004). They’re probably one and the same.
Whatever he says about the Raptor, I’m not inclined to read. That man is a crackpot wierdo.
Originally posted by google
shamayel, I must say I don’t find your picture very humorous or appropriate.
Me neither, but the J-10 looks good.
Originally posted by google
shamayel, I must say I don’t find your picture very humorous or appropriate.
Me neither, but the J-10 looks good.
On http://www.themoscowtimes.com I heard that Putin is reassembling the FSB to be as large as the KGB was- because after the fall, the KGB was split into various agencies- i.e. the successor FSB lost control of the border guards for example.
Hardly surprising- I always thought splitting it was a bad idea. Too much bureaucracy.
“After the collapse of communism, the KGB was broken up into five separate agencies, but it was not fully disbanded nor was the successor organizations’ mode of operation seriously reformed. Now President Vladimir Putin, a former KGB operative, is reassembling the dreaded Soviet secret police.
The president announced that two former KGB agencies, the Federal Border Service and Federal Agency for Government Communications and Information, will be reintegrated with the main KGB successor agency, the FSB.
It was FAPSI’s job not only to encode and secure government communications, but also to intercept e-mails, faxes and other private communications, as well as to record telephone and radio conversations in Russia and abroad. Now the enlarged FSB will be able to listen to anything any Russian (including government officials) says or sends — without the need to involve other government agencies or explain its actions.
Everything will be concentrated in one big secret police agency: the authority to investigate suspected “foreign spies” and other wrongdoers the state does not like; and the ability to intrude deeply into the private lives of citizens using the most modern electronic means.
It is typical that while announcing the recreation of a KGB-style super secret police, Putin did not propose the creation of any, even superficial, public system for controlling its activities. Of course, an authoritarian state does not envisage any such controls.
The old-time all-powerful KGB not only controlled the lives and souls of its subjects, it also controlled the external borders of the Soviet Union. It seemed logical to bundle all the jobs into one super agency, including the border guards.
Now the FSB will also have its own massive armed force, the border guards — with more than 100,000 soldiers, armor, an air force and a navy. Why would a truly democratic country need such a hybrid super agency?
Putin’s official explanation for the secret service reforms is that “government structures are not acting efficiently enough or duly coordinating their efforts in this very important sphere.”
Putin’s assessment is correct — the lack of coordination is appalling. In fighting in Tajikistan in the 1990s and recently in the Caucasus, Russian border guards and the army both suffered unwarranted losses of men and equipment due to poor coordination.
The more recent encounters occurred last August and September in the Chechen mountains and in nearby Ingushetia when Chechen rebel groups allegedly infiltrated across the border from Georgia. In August, border guards were killed because they did not get sufficient heavy gun and air support from the army and air force in time. In September, the border guards in turn reportedly allowed a large rebel force to slip through their lines and did not inform the army in time or in full. A unit of the 58th army was ambushed in Ingushetia and suffered losses. It was later announced that the “bandits” were surrounded and would be eliminated. But in fact the rebels slipped away.
It would seem logical for Putin to correct this obvious lack of coordination by eliminating the inefficient Russian system of parallel armies that has border guards, Defense Ministry and Interior Ministry troops often fighting on the same battlefield under independent commands. Instead a new powerful FSB army is being created.
In many East European countries, former officers of once all-powerful communist secret police forces are banned from holding public office. In Russia, a former KGB officer is reforming the country to his likes and inserting KGB cronies in important positions.
A new drug tsar was appointed this week, Viktor Cherkesov, who will be head of a newly formed State Committee for the Control of Narcotics. Narcotics truly need controlling in Russia, but Cherkesov has a background of prosecuting Soviet-era dissidents and in more recent times charged the environmentalist Alexander Nikitin with “espionage.” Who can guarantee that in the future the new tsar will not use trumped-up narcotics charges to imprison dissidents?
The media has been subdued, but press freedom has not yet been fully eradicated. Putin has built a centralized system of authoritarian rule, but major unrestricted repression has been unleashed only in Chechnya. Today only Putin’s good will keeps Russia, which is balanced on the brink, from becoming a dictatorship. How long will this clemency last?”
This is Pavel Felgenhauer’s usual alarmist bullsh1t. I’ve heard his crap before- he pontificates at length about things he knows nothing about regularly.
On http://www.themoscowtimes.com I heard that Putin is reassembling the FSB to be as large as the KGB was- because after the fall, the KGB was split into various agencies- i.e. the successor FSB lost control of the border guards for example.
Hardly surprising- I always thought splitting it was a bad idea. Too much bureaucracy.
“After the collapse of communism, the KGB was broken up into five separate agencies, but it was not fully disbanded nor was the successor organizations’ mode of operation seriously reformed. Now President Vladimir Putin, a former KGB operative, is reassembling the dreaded Soviet secret police.
The president announced that two former KGB agencies, the Federal Border Service and Federal Agency for Government Communications and Information, will be reintegrated with the main KGB successor agency, the FSB.
It was FAPSI’s job not only to encode and secure government communications, but also to intercept e-mails, faxes and other private communications, as well as to record telephone and radio conversations in Russia and abroad. Now the enlarged FSB will be able to listen to anything any Russian (including government officials) says or sends — without the need to involve other government agencies or explain its actions.
Everything will be concentrated in one big secret police agency: the authority to investigate suspected “foreign spies” and other wrongdoers the state does not like; and the ability to intrude deeply into the private lives of citizens using the most modern electronic means.
It is typical that while announcing the recreation of a KGB-style super secret police, Putin did not propose the creation of any, even superficial, public system for controlling its activities. Of course, an authoritarian state does not envisage any such controls.
The old-time all-powerful KGB not only controlled the lives and souls of its subjects, it also controlled the external borders of the Soviet Union. It seemed logical to bundle all the jobs into one super agency, including the border guards.
Now the FSB will also have its own massive armed force, the border guards — with more than 100,000 soldiers, armor, an air force and a navy. Why would a truly democratic country need such a hybrid super agency?
Putin’s official explanation for the secret service reforms is that “government structures are not acting efficiently enough or duly coordinating their efforts in this very important sphere.”
Putin’s assessment is correct — the lack of coordination is appalling. In fighting in Tajikistan in the 1990s and recently in the Caucasus, Russian border guards and the army both suffered unwarranted losses of men and equipment due to poor coordination.
The more recent encounters occurred last August and September in the Chechen mountains and in nearby Ingushetia when Chechen rebel groups allegedly infiltrated across the border from Georgia. In August, border guards were killed because they did not get sufficient heavy gun and air support from the army and air force in time. In September, the border guards in turn reportedly allowed a large rebel force to slip through their lines and did not inform the army in time or in full. A unit of the 58th army was ambushed in Ingushetia and suffered losses. It was later announced that the “bandits” were surrounded and would be eliminated. But in fact the rebels slipped away.
It would seem logical for Putin to correct this obvious lack of coordination by eliminating the inefficient Russian system of parallel armies that has border guards, Defense Ministry and Interior Ministry troops often fighting on the same battlefield under independent commands. Instead a new powerful FSB army is being created.
In many East European countries, former officers of once all-powerful communist secret police forces are banned from holding public office. In Russia, a former KGB officer is reforming the country to his likes and inserting KGB cronies in important positions.
A new drug tsar was appointed this week, Viktor Cherkesov, who will be head of a newly formed State Committee for the Control of Narcotics. Narcotics truly need controlling in Russia, but Cherkesov has a background of prosecuting Soviet-era dissidents and in more recent times charged the environmentalist Alexander Nikitin with “espionage.” Who can guarantee that in the future the new tsar will not use trumped-up narcotics charges to imprison dissidents?
The media has been subdued, but press freedom has not yet been fully eradicated. Putin has built a centralized system of authoritarian rule, but major unrestricted repression has been unleashed only in Chechnya. Today only Putin’s good will keeps Russia, which is balanced on the brink, from becoming a dictatorship. How long will this clemency last?”
This is Pavel Felgenhauer’s usual alarmist bullsh1t. I’ve heard his crap before- he pontificates at length about things he knows nothing about regularly.
I believe the Interior Ministry (MVD) serves that function- well armed with tanks, APCs etc- even though their equipment is undoubtedly second-line (e.g. T-62s most common tank).
I believe the Interior Ministry (MVD) serves that function- well armed with tanks, APCs etc- even though their equipment is undoubtedly second-line (e.g. T-62s most common tank).