dark light

EdLaw

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 1,259 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: More news on the carrier (China) #2089125
    EdLaw
    Participant

    I disagree about the Chinese not buying the Mig-29Ks for logistical reasons, though they may choose not to buy them for other reasons. The PLAN could easily receive 100 or so Mig-29Ks, given the way China seems to handle defence purchases, though they might prefer to buy the more capable Sukhoi Su-33. The main concern would be the performance of the Mig against the Taiwanese and American aircraft – the Mig would lose, where the Sukhoi might succeed.

    If the Varyag goes into service, they would be sensible to use the Migs, if only to allow numbers – if they are being used to fire in missiles from a distance, then the Migs are okay. If China can use the Delilah missile (procured from Israel), then the Migs would be more than adequate, as long as they do not get ‘pounced’ by an American carrier, or Taiwanese aircraft.

    in reply to: Fun With Google Earth #2610177
    EdLaw
    Participant

    You can just look for US bases on globalsecurity.org, which gives you the coordinates of the bases, when you find Davis Monthan, then you just scroll around the boneyard.

    To simplify the job, here is Monthan’s coordinates:

    32° 09′ N, 110° 52′ W

    in reply to: Military instalations on Maps Google #2090788
    EdLaw
    Participant

    Yes, Palmdale, there are a load of aircraft there, if you scroll around the various ramps.

    Take a look at AMARC/Monthan, it is amazing to see all of the aircraft parked up, and very sad to see all the B-52s losing their wings.

    in reply to: Spruance class #2090905
    EdLaw
    Participant

    For ASW, the ships just have the normal 324mm torpedo launcher, plus the helicopters – not exactly a stunning capability! I would have half expected them to replace the SM-1 with a RIM-116 launcher, which would at least leave them a basic defensive capability. I think this is a sad part of the future, look at the LCS, it now seems to only have a 57mm gun, and a RIM-116 launcher, with no SSM, no advanced defence missile system, no VLS, and no other real capability. I would have expected the LCS to end up being a pretty bare hull, but with a large Mk41 VLS, or its replacement, allowing a mixture of missiles, to suit the mission, but that seems unlikely now.

    in reply to: Military instalations on Maps Google #2090984
    EdLaw
    Participant

    Just found a B-2, F-117, YC-15, T-38, X-32, and still going…

    in reply to: British CVF thread #2091273
    EdLaw
    Participant

    I think the important part would be to fit something similar to the American RAM missile to the amphibs and support vessels – if each ship can basically defend itself, then it makes a task force a lot easier to ‘manage’. One of the weaknesses in the Falklands was the relative inability of individual vessels to defend themselves, which meant that frigates actually had to protect other ships with their defence missiles.

    I think that having self-sufficient vessels in the battle group would allow for a more flexible deployment of assets, allowing targets to be further apart – it is great to decoy an Exocet missile, but if all you do is trick it to sink another of your ships, it is not such a great bargain…

    in reply to: U.S. Anti Ship Missile #2091657
    EdLaw
    Participant

    Harpoon is still in service, though a number of surface combatants carry reduced numbers, due to the perceived lack of naval threat. The TASM, as far as I know, was withdrawn years ago, since there was little perception of a need – though in practice, the newer Tomahawk models could probably be used against most surface combatants.

    in reply to: Military instalations on Maps Google #2091710
    EdLaw
    Participant

    I have to say, some of the Aussie defence purchases are pretty good, the new carriers look like they are going to be quite good. I also like the F-111s, it might have been nice to simply have a joint UK-Aussie program, rather than Tornado, we could have received a mix of F/A-18s and F-111s… Talk about punching above your weight!

    in reply to: What right has the US got… #2611615
    EdLaw
    Participant

    In actual fact, the reason for Macedonia disposing of the Sukhoi Su-25s is simple: they are not the best aircraft for their mission. The US has actually been seeking to arrange for Mil Mi-24s to be transferred to Macedonia, since they are far better suited to the job! The US did not force the Macedonian government to do it, but sanity prevailed, and though the Frogfoots might be more glamorous than the Hinds, they are not the right aircraft for Macedonia.

    If Macedonia wanted fixed wing combat aircraft, the Aero L-39 would be a much better aircraft, since it is cheap enough to actually operate!

    in reply to: Military instalations on Maps Google #2091774
    EdLaw
    Participant

    I was using Google Earth, Erez, It’s basically the same thing, just repackaged.

    I took a look at various bits of Australia, just for interest, looks like a nice place Ja.

    If you look carefully, you can make out the DMZ in Korea, including some North Korean facilities.

    in reply to: Military instalations on Maps Google #2091864
    EdLaw
    Participant

    I guess Google maps will slowly improve its coverage – I can just about make out the general area I live in the UK, but I can make out individual cars in the US, where I used to be.

    in reply to: Military instalations on Maps Google #2091976
    EdLaw
    Participant

    I also found a submarine under construction (I assume it is under construction anyway), in Groton, CT.

    in reply to: Military instalations on Maps Google #2092056
    EdLaw
    Participant

    In Norfolk, and the surrounding area, I can immediately see three carriers, plus three large deck amphibs. If you scroll south from the two carriers that are side by side, then you will find yet another carrier, next to an amphib.

    I just wish the UK could afford that many ships…

    in reply to: Military instalations on Maps Google #2092086
    EdLaw
    Participant

    I found the Stennis (CVN-74) in San Diego. I also spotted one of the Iowa Class battleships in Norfolk, Wisconsin I think (BB-64).

    in reply to: Picture of LPX under construction #2092662
    EdLaw
    Participant

    Just a thought, but the bow looks a bit odd – it would have looked a lot better if it had been finished with a ‘squared off’ bow, like the American Wasp class. Otherwise, a fine looking ship, probably built at a reasonable price.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 1,259 total)