okay, not technically, IAF, but still…
from the website above linked to earlier:
Originally posted by Mirage
Darth,Its a Mig-27m…
Thanks man. I always get confused differentiating between the two..:o
vintage An-12
from
http://www.gironet.nl/home/kruijff/mis.htm
What is it? 23bn or 27m?
hs748
pretty dark camo in the middle one…!
Il-76md
Originally posted by Hyperwarp
How about “F!st!ng”?? That starts with “F” too 😀 😀 .
Never thought i’d hear words like this in a family friendly forum such as this, dude:p
Some of these codenames seem to br arbitrary without meaning.
What does ‘fishbed’ mean anyway.? A bed of fish? The bed upon which fish sleep ?? :confused: :rolleyes:
And i misunderstood ‘fagot’ for a long time. Only recently did i find out that it meant a ‘bundle of sticks tied together’ 😀
Originally posted by pchupunkar
Another rookie question for the knowledgeable people regarding engine tech. Why is titanium not used for the blades? Isnt titanium used for all places which require high structural integrity, would that not make it a better choice for the blades.
Do the properties of titanium degrade in high temp & high pressure?
-Ni alloys have higher strength at higher temperatures than Ti alloys. AFAIK, there are no Ti alloys capable of operating in the temperature regime of Ni superalloys and satisfy all other requirements too. I believe Ti has severe oxidation problems too, but dont quote me on that.
-Intermetallics of Ti may be used to circumvent the above temperature problem, but then, with intermetallics you have other serious problems of ductility, toughness etc
-Ti alloys are a pain in the butt to form into complex shapes. Same with Ti aluminides and other intermetallics. One way is to go down the powder metallurgy route, but then, problems with process control and reproducibility in properties between different batches offsets any gains in other areas. Still, T-6Al-4V and similar alloys are used in the aerospace industry, but not in turbine blades.
-Ti is very expensive. 😀 (okay, but so is Ni superalloys..dont know exact prices though)
Edit: I think (again, not 100% sure, gotta check my books) that at the temperatures to which turbine blades are exposed, Ni superalloys actually have a higher specific strength compared to Ti alloys, simply because Ti becomes so weak at that temperature that its low density becomes useless as an engineering property.
Originally posted by google
or F**ker:)
Like the Fokker hehehe 😀
Wolv,
Please pardon me if i misunderstood your post, but turbine blades are manufactured from nickel-based superalloys, later coated with a layer of ceramic film to increase high temperature properties.
AFAIK, turbine blades are not made from steel. Steel is not strong enough at high temperatures which the internals of the turbine experience, to withstand the forces acting on it.
BTW, many newer blades are hollow, with carefully designed internal channels to facilitate airflow through them and keep the blades cool.
Originally posted by phrozenflame
I think running F-18 on nVidia Geforce 4 MX 64 Mb with anti-aliasing on 4x would bring the graphics quite up-to-date?I gotta get F-18, thanks guys.
Phrozen,
Not played F-18, but I am not sure if the GeForce4 MX series can handle Anti-aliasing all that well, especially at 4x. It is basically a souped up GF-2 card. Nvidia cards have historically not been so good at AA as the ATI radeon cards have. Truly smooth framerates (with AF and AA enabled) at 1280×960 and above have been possible only with the radeon 9700 and GF FX series onwards, depending on the rest of your system. It was stuttering on a friends system (T-bird 850MHz, 256MB, GF4MX420 etc) at 1024×786, but even without AA, F-18 looks pretty nice anyway 🙂
But at 1024×768, maybe it will do good on your system since F-18 is an older game and not much of a problem for newer hardware…but dont count on it.
What config are you running, by the way?