Yes, but it is “little” Britain, as much as it is “little” France.

But there’s a football game on TV (Czech Rep vs Denmark) and I want to save the other people on the forum a 10-page long lecture. However, you’re using the word “you” as if all 24 other memberstates have one similar goal and that is to destroy the UK. :rolleyes: Pathetic it is, I don’t know you, but, it’s never too late to go to school.

Yeah, there were other candidates, but there was one country, on an island which keeps blocking “strong” candidates and wants to replace them. This particular country however considers itself to be very anti-EU, still, they like to have the last say on European politics. I forgot the name though.

Distiller, I just finished my exams and I really don’t want to start discussing historical facts. But your arguments are about the stupidest one I ever heard, I wouldn’t expect to hear them from a mentally retarted 6-year old. Bringing up the seven years war to prove France is still imperialist. :confused: :confused: :confused: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: France payed back Engand some years later by supporting the founding of a new country you want to form a federation with today.

Problem today is that being ignorant is kind of accepted, because that means you are conservative and I should respect your opinion. So it’s OK for you to bash on Portugal, France and the rest of Europe … after all, it’s an opinion. France, catholic culture 😀 😀 😀 Yeah, if there’s on single nation on this world which is really not religious it must be France! If it wasn’t of France, God would be in our constitution (which I thought was a good thing to stress on Europe’s Judeo-Christian heritage). But France is already more than 200 years a secular state. I guess you never heard about the French Revolution as well. Funny you didn’t mention Hastings. Look I could go on untill the cows come home, but that would let me look like a complete arrogant *******. But sorry, folks, such kind of nonsence can not be accepted. There are other ways to discuss Euro-scepticism without these xenophic arguments. Sad sad it is.

This is me, on my way to my last exam.

I got let’s say 4092 posts, lets say 4000 of them were complete crap, but the 92 good ones are worth it! However, I’ve been here already on this place more than four years AND, apart from the exams, I only posts once or twice a day. I have no problems leaving the forum for a couple of weeks (like during holidays) so no, not addicted.

I don’t believe sepperate states could solve the problems. In fact, these can make it even worse. I think it would be better if all ethnic groups were still under one leader and got some sort of autonomy (like culture, education). Don’t want to boast, but the Belgian model could have been introduced in Yugoslavia I think without having a civil war. Maybe you could claim the state was artificial, but be it so, if that could avoid thousands of human lifes.

Allbright was Hungarian herself, right? Well, she may have been personally in favour of a military action, and so was Clinton, but that doesn’t mean the whole nation (senate) supported it.

Vortex, don’t get me wrong. I have no problems with sending a bill. After all, the European states have less financial problems than the US (thanks to EU budget-limiting). I think it’s normal we pay back a part, actually the UN should have paid, if it had a budget ofcourse. As I said, peacekeeping is a global task, it’s not up to one nation to bring peace (as in Iraq and also Kosovo), it should be supported and paid by the world community. Otherwise there can’t be no peace. That’s utopia I know.