dark light

knifeedgeturn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 467 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Accident at Reno… P51 Galloping Ghost. #1081423
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    I think a caution should accompany the video link above, some of the comments posted are really nasty….

    I also see his age variously reported from between 72 to 80; personally I wouldn’t read anything into his age, as apart from having been a flyer since 14, whomever did his medical knew he was a racer, not some old boy doing circuits in his stearman.

    He says in the video that they cut off 10 ft of wing, and the landing speed is more akin to a mig 17/21! and uses a form of evaporative cooling, hence theres no dog house, just a couple of round holes for the steam to exit.

    He also said that the modified canopy, meant that the pilots head was virtually touching the top.

    in reply to: Accident at Reno… P51 Galloping Ghost. #1081644
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    That’s a good link Bruce, the one thing I would say, is that they are discussing and speculating, on the cause of the accident, (un-moderated) and appear to be able to do that without making wild accusations, and ill informed conclusions (some appear to be friends of the late pilot)

    Most seem to have an understanding of the subject; is that why we are having a problem here?

    in reply to: General Discussion #289825
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Triumph Spitfire, stays truthful to the original concept in at least one area, it retains the inward retracting U/C……

    Knifeedge: I know that the REAL Spitfire had outward retracting gear (called undercarriage in my pre-C130 days!)

    You were right about the Trumf Spit/Herald/etc gear swinging inwards when ‘raised’ by the suspension system – damn near had a nasty in mine!
    Awful car – haven’t had a drive in an E-Type or a Lightning, although I fancy the ‘E’ handled a tad better than a Herald 😮

    Yes your right about the “real” Spitfire’s undercart, I could have said Hurricane, as a company called Hurricane made a very nice body to replace the spitfire’s own, but it seemed more appropriate to link the two “spitfires”.

    A road test at the time said that it had the unique ability to go from negative camber to positive camber almost instantly, having driven them I can concur.

    I’ve driven almost every car from the ’60’s, I still cant think of one that had decent brakes; the big problem with drum brakes, was brake fade, compounded by an almost weekly requirement to adjust them, leaky wheel cylinders, and no telling which way they would pull the car (on the first application).

    Quite a few harsh comments here r.e the Etype, I suspect those who drove it, and didn’t like it, expected far more than could be bought for £2k, had they have driven an Aston or Ferrari, they would have reached the conclusion that, the Etype was much the same, in terms of speed, stopping and rusting, but a fraction of the price; those of us that still have one, will have to content ourselves, with very reasonable resale prices, should we be too disappointed……

    in reply to: Lightning and E-Type #1876825
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Triumph Spitfire, stays truthful to the original concept in at least one area, it retains the inward retracting U/C……

    Knifeedge: I know that the REAL Spitfire had outward retracting gear (called undercarriage in my pre-C130 days!)

    You were right about the Trumf Spit/Herald/etc gear swinging inwards when ‘raised’ by the suspension system – damn near had a nasty in mine!
    Awful car – haven’t had a drive in an E-Type or a Lightning, although I fancy the ‘E’ handled a tad better than a Herald 😮

    Yes your right about the “real” Spitfire’s undercart, I could have said Hurricane, as a company called Hurricane made a very nice body to replace the spitfire’s own, but it seemed more appropriate to link the two “spitfires”.

    A road test at the time said that it had the unique ability to go from negative camber to positive camber almost instantly, having driven them I can concur.

    I’ve driven almost every car from the ’60’s, I still cant think of one that had decent brakes; the big problem with drum brakes, was brake fade, compounded by an almost weekly requirement to adjust them, leaky wheel cylinders, and no telling which way they would pull the car (on the first application).

    Quite a few harsh comments here r.e the Etype, I suspect those who drove it, and didn’t like it, expected far more than could be bought for £2k, had they have driven an Aston or Ferrari, they would have reached the conclusion that, the Etype was much the same, in terms of speed, stopping and rusting, but a fraction of the price; those of us that still have one, will have to content ourselves, with very reasonable resale prices, should we be too disappointed……

    in reply to: General Discussion #289962
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    wonder if they would have allowed it if they’d discovered they were only heralds realy !!:confused:

    probably , the herald was better looking !!

    Triumph Spitfire, stays truthful to the original concept in at least one area, it retains the inward retracting U/C……

    Brakes on an Etype are fairly awful by modern standards, but any one who had a Mini, or an Anglia, 100E, or for that matter a Cortina, all of which are contempories of the Jag, (and none of which could top the ton) will appreciate how good the brakes were then.

    Whilst I do enjoy the challenge of Lotus ownership, they should never be mentioned in the same sentence as a Jag when the word reliability is also present.

    BTW which Elan was it with the Climax engine?

    in reply to: Lightning and E-Type #1877451
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    wonder if they would have allowed it if they’d discovered they were only heralds realy !!:confused:

    probably , the herald was better looking !!

    Triumph Spitfire, stays truthful to the original concept in at least one area, it retains the inward retracting U/C……

    Brakes on an Etype are fairly awful by modern standards, but any one who had a Mini, or an Anglia, 100E, or for that matter a Cortina, all of which are contempories of the Jag, (and none of which could top the ton) will appreciate how good the brakes were then.

    Whilst I do enjoy the challenge of Lotus ownership, they should never be mentioned in the same sentence as a Jag when the word reliability is also present.

    BTW which Elan was it with the Climax engine?

    in reply to: Hurricane incident , North Weald. #1022852
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    you can take tablets for that nowadays. I’m led to believe

    I thought that the tablets helped you get the gear up, but once up, it wouldn’t come down again for several hours, (even when you’d lost interest in “the job in hand”) or is that a different med?

    in reply to: Hurricane incident , North Weald. #1030793
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    you can take tablets for that nowadays. I’m led to believe

    I thought that the tablets helped you get the gear up, but once up, it wouldn’t come down again for several hours, (even when you’d lost interest in “the job in hand”) or is that a different med?

    in reply to: Plastic Spitfire, Friday. #1025278
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    That’s a big access panel for the radio set, I know the old valve radios were large, but that looks as though a complete radiogram is fitted; does the turntable play ok when taxiing?

    in reply to: Plastic Spitfire, Friday. #1033365
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    That’s a big access panel for the radio set, I know the old valve radios were large, but that looks as though a complete radiogram is fitted; does the turntable play ok when taxiing?

    in reply to: The End of the "Aerodrome" #1043434
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    “Technically of course the two words are correct for what they describe”

    Reminds me of another thread recently closed!

    in reply to: The End of the "Aerodrome" #1043661
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    In Essex too Sharr (n) Trac (y) are quite common…

    in reply to: Imagine uncovering a camera……blah blah blah #1045005
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    I fixed it for you. 😀

    Thanks……. although Wiki says English (Hawaiian)

    With regard to language, if you want to muck around with it, get your own; like Latin, English is an established language, it doesn’t matter how many people mis spell or mis pronounce it, it wont change (innit)

    BTW I hear the Australians are considering dropping French and German, in favour of Chinese, on the basis that much of the anticipated future trade will take place with them, and very little between Europe and themselves; best of luck with that!

    in reply to: Imagine uncovering a camera……blah blah blah #1046037
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    A couple of points; Pearl is in fact a place name, Pearl city, Pearl island etc, (just south of Honolulu) when you hear

    the Americans refering to “Pearl”, they are not abbreviating, that is the location.

    The Hawaiian flag is an amalgamation of the British and US flag, the union jack, replacing the stars; the spoken language is English.

    in reply to: If you are offered an AN2 down the pub tonight.. #1047742
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    “I told you they was organised”

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 467 total)