I think not. With a dissolved wheel and a pressurised inner tube, the tube will balloon to several times its cross sectional area.
Try blowing up an un-restrained bicycle tyre. 🙂
Mark
PS It is easy to under estimate the forces involved in a wheel/tyre/inner tube at working pressure. I recall that military wheels, in my time, where often the two part bolt together type. The wheel was bolted together with nuts painted red and the wheel nuts to the hub painted yellow. I believe there were fatalities where the wrong nuts were undone. Indeed I remember there where special cages in workshops to dis-assemble units in safety.
Or indeed the strength of the sidewall on an aeronautical tyre,(try pulling one apart) they will happily contain modest pressures, but of course the tube will balloon out the gap.
the colour coding of military wheels was to stop untrained personel from undoing the wrong set of nuts when trying to remove the wheel from the vehicle; doubtless, should all the nuts be removed at the same time, there would be a nasty accident, especially as some of the bigger vehicles run up to 90psi.
(With apologies to Circus 6)
Wouldn’t be the first time a tyre has stayed inflated but the wheel rim has rotted away.
Yeah it will, but it might over hang a bit….
It’s common for ditched aircraft to end up upside down. Another odd phenomenon is their u/c legs often end up in the extended position – maybe related to later failure of the uplocks, but no-one has ever given a very satisfactory explanation for this. The ‘reluctant messerschmitt’ salvaged off Dymchurch in the 70’s and a Whitley also off Dymchurch both ditched nomally and both ended up in this configuration as have others.
Must be an awful lot of pressure exerted on the up locks by the tyres full of air.
Me too, (although I don’t actually know where the airfield is) but am happy to help.
When the big hand is on the | and the little hand is on the _ it will be _| …….. precisely.
Are you seeing different pictures to me? There appears to be a smashed Merlin and thats about it.
It’s worse than that, it’s a BMC replacement unit…..
If i read it [the thread] properly I think the point was more that she had backed the project and with her blessing it had got to this point and now she has changed her mind after commitments were made financially and practically by alot of people,a bit of a kick in the teeth really.
That’s my understanding of it as well, but I think maybe the reality that she will actually see the boat run, has stirred up feelings that she maybe had locked away for a long while; ask yourself this, if your own father had died in a craft that was destroyed, and lost, only to be found and restored and then run by someone, how would you feel, mixed emotions?
When it’s run I hope they put on a good show; old racing machines shouldn’t be paraded.
I would have thought Gina Cambell’s position was obvious; this boat killed her father, what more do you need to say?
I voted yes to see it run, pure nostalgia, but thats me.
I’m hugely impressed with the workmanship, and indeed the ethos, trying to save as much as possible, no matter how long it takes; that is restoration.
Doesn’t North Weald already have a Saturday market? not sure how the two would get on, but I agree it’s a good venue and about as central as your going to get; I’d be suprised if Duxford would “lower” themselves to allow an aero jumble!
Well perhaps we should agree to disagree; my experience being different to yours.
Pete; I didn’t mean the histories of the various A/C, (which can all be learned parrot fashion) but the nut and bolt end of things.
T/O; I’m glad to hear that Flypast still supports the event, it’s maybe a shame that they no longer run a feature in the magazine, as dragging exhibits up and down the highways can be a thankless task; to see a photo in FP made that effort feel worthwhile.
Mike J, your post (to which I was responding) has disappeared
Perhaps you’re too busy advancing grassroots preservation by sitting in your cockpit section in your garage, dressed in a flying suit and bonedome and making aeroplane noises to entertain yourself.
I like your thinking, but actually I’m in the photograph, (and a dozen or so more) my aeroplane and cockpit sections are well travelled.
I have thought about my statement, and can see your point, (I tend to focus on one area of warbird preservation and am speaking about the majority of owners of these A/C)
There is much in this world that isn’t as it seems, and people who you think own a certain A/C, don’t; this isn’t the time for name and shame, but I do stand by my remarks about the owners of these aeroplanes, its big business, suffice to say that the era of owner operators is behind us. (unfortunately)
I would but I find the retention of A/C serial no’s beyond my current mental capacity; I would only add that I have never been to Jersey, or the Cayman islands, and neither have the various warbirds registered in these (and many other parts) of the world; if your luckier than I with the power of retention simply go to the CAA’s G-info and look them up.
To me the first photo highlights the difference between the “grass roots” end of aircraft preservation and the upper echelons, where the aeroplanes are owned by faceless companies (or individuals) that are never photographed with their piece(s) of history, and in many cases have little knowledge about them either; long may they (the events) continue.
It is a shame however that Flypast no longer supports the (British) event.
I dont think it is Spitfire, certainly I have never seen anything like the first picture attached to one.