LMFS Here is the interview
https://ria.ru/20110815/417675459.html
– Did you drop in air defense-pro-vko tomorrow today?
– Why drop in. I think that the nomenclature of aerospace defense weapons currently in development is comprehensive. In addition to the above funds and their subsequent upgrades, there will be no others on earth.
– I.e…?
– That is, the following weapons will not be land-based, but air. The following systems, which will appear after the S-500, will be air-based.
Some of them are also already under development and are being tested.
| [TR] | |||||
| [TD]
[/TD] |
|||||
| [/TR] | |||||
| [TR] | |||||
| [TD]09/03/2019 12:08:48[/TD] | |||||
| [/TR] | |||||
| [TR] | |||||
| [TD] Moscow. September 3rd. INTERFAX – More than 400 new helicopters will go into service with the Russian army until 2028 | Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said. | ||||
| “In accordance with the state armament program | from 2018 to 2027 | the company’s enterprises (Russian Helicopters | included in Rostec – IF) are to produce 423 modern helicopters for the Ministry of Defense | ” Shoigu said at a conference call on Tuesday. | |
| According to him | during this period | the military | including | should receive 98 attack helicopters Mi-28NM – the latest modification of the Night Hunter | the contract for the supply of which was concluded in June at the Army forum on behalf of the President of Russia. |
| “At the same time | the holding significantly reduced their declared value” | ||||
| The Minister of Defense noted that at present | the troops received 112 different helicopters | 58 of them – ahead of schedule. | |||
| “The supply of 60 units of equipment is planned for the current year | 42 helicopters have already been handed over | ” said the head of the Russian Defense Ministry. | |||
| He said that in the part of the selector that is closed to the press | it will be discussed “how the Russian Helicopters holding” fulfills its obligations to the Ministry of Defense. ” [/TD] | ||||
| [/TR] |
Not RuAF but still interesting
Photos: MAX-2019: MS-21 completed a half-barrel
LMFS , On Mig-41 program the last boss of Almaz-Antey Igor Ashurbeyli had said in an interview that the next generation SAM that they were working on wont be land based but will be only Air Based.
This was way back in 2011 when he was boss but he didnt revel more details.
Likely besides being an interceptor the Mig-41 will Lug along the next generation SAM in their underbelly to take on ASAT and BM targets , Flying High and Fast has the advantage that you can travel many 100 km in many minutes and dont waste energy in booster to take your SAM to tens of Km in Altitude making you SAM smaller in Size and Weight.
Also the possibility that Mig-41 will carry laser based weapon cannot be ruled out either.
International Premiere of MS-21 at MAKS 2019
Can any body translate the Russian part of Su-57E


I wonder why they cant add 5th HP on the wings end or close to it for a R-73 ? , It would be a waste of Wing Area space or may be for 4 HP they can have a dual rack for A2A missile as seen on some western fighters
As PD-8 will have higher BPR 7-8 over SaM146 4.5 we can also expect better fuel efficiency.
Just came across this very recent article by Vladimir Karnozov on Russian Engine , At the end of the article there is a comparision between Western and all Russian engine including PS-90 and PD-14
https://www.aex.ru/docs/3/2019/8/26/2950/
Specific fuel consumption, kg / kgf * h for PW 1400G is 0.51
Specific fuel consumption, kg / kgf * h for PD-14 is 0.525
He mentions in that article
Certification MS-21 / PD-14 is planned by mid-2022. According to the calculations of Perm, they beat PW1500 at the cost of a flight hour of 3-5%. Fuel consumption is slightly higher, but the PD-14 has fewer blade stages, which means it is easier and faster to service on the ground.
Surprise to see in that table SaM146 Engine fuel consumption of Superjet 100
Specific fuel consumption, kg / kgf * h is 0.629 which is worse than PS-90A1 ( 0.604 ) and PS-90A2 ( 0.6 )
As the Russian would be using variant of PD-14 and even PD-35 for Civil and Military Transport aircraft , I would assume simplicity of maintenance would be a key factor for the military.
Hence sticking to High Bypass Engine would be a key factor and yes the PD-18R GTF wont see light of the day now.
I was expecting at MAKS they would show some data on Fuel Consumption of PD-14 versus PW 14000G
So a high bypass turbofan engine will turn out to be less expensive to maintain than a GTF one ?
Probably would be the same for LEAP versus GTF
More Customers Surface for MC-21 as It Debuts at MAKS
All the three of the test aircraft now flying rely on Pratt & Whitney PW1400G turbofans, while the fourth, now under assembly, will feature PD-14s. The Aviadvigatel design house promises a 3 to 5 percent advantage in operational cost per flight hour through lower maintenance compared to the Pratt geared turbofan