This India and AKULA is complete BS. There is a report from Russian news source
where the export chief is clearly saying that 18% of future contacts belong to
India and 60% to China. And value of total contacts is $12B. So India total value
comes to around $2.5B. Which includes Gorskov and Flanker contacts. The report
is at Su-30MK thread at CDF.
The deal for the leasing of Akula was confirme way back in 2002 by the then indian defence secretary Ajay Prasad , also all reputed defence magazine Janes , Defence News and naval forces has confirmed , janes had even confirmed that the deal was signed with the Groshkov Deal and so did defence news , only the number seems to vary , Janes perhaps is more right on the 2+1 issue , 2 on lease more 1 if required , the first sub will be with the navy by 2005 , No matter what the Russians will not be giving the chinese Top of the line technology as compared to the Indians , the russian are them self apprehensive about it and due to strong us objection , Indians had leased the Charile -2 SSN before so the leasing agreement is not a new one .
Also dont be suprised if the ATV carried some IRBM class missile , Strictly speaking Indians cannot afford to have an SSN as well as an SSBN fleet , so as a compromise solution the ATV will be designed to perform both the task.
Again I am speculating from what naval forces has been saying for a while and if you read the recent Strategice Doctorine of the navy , the Sea based deterrent is high on the priority list.
Too bad that between P15 and P15A, there is going to be a lag of about 10 yrs. Even worse, the IN should have gone ahead and built 3 more P15s with some incremental upgrades in b/w the P15 and P15A time lag.
When is the first P15A hull supposed to be launched? Commissioned?
Also, in the din of the P15A stuff, don’t forget about the other stuff in the report: Namely that 12 IAI Herons are already in service and the req for 40 new gen ASW/MR helos.
I have read that the IN is happy with the Herons and want more. Any confirmation of the same?
__________________
Victor There was plans to built the P-15B after P-15 A but now it has apperently been cancelled as the Delhi cannot be stretched further also limits imposed on stealth and sensors as its a late 80 design , so after P-15A we could see the P-18 class of destroyers, P-15A will be launched next year and commisioned in 2007/2008 with the remaining two following with a years interval.Yep the navy is happy with Herons euipped with elta 2022A radar and IR sensors the inventory will gradually increase
I think the article is in error then. The 9M38M1 (as stated in the article) missile is the SA-11 GADFLY, and the navalised version is the SA-N-7. The SA-17 GRIZZLY uses the new 9M317 (or possibly the 9M38M2, it’s unclear) missile with a small increase in range. The new Chinese Type 52B DDGs are fitted with it.
An article from here states clearly that the TALWAR has 9M317. I thought it was odd at first, becasue I thought the TALWAR only had the old SA-N-7.
Again, I think the article is wrong.
Glenn, AFAIK there is ****il and ****il-1 the ****il carries the SA-N-7(Gadfly ) and the ****il-1 as on Talwar carries the SA-N-17 Grizzly , The P-15A will definately carry the Grizzly , No point in Carrying the SA-N-7 as in delhi class as the SAM is itself 20 years old first entered in 82 with the Sovermny, Infact its very difficult the differenciate just by looks as they look very similar , As far as specs goes the Range has been increased from 35 to 45 Km , It carries better guidance , has the Same Mach-3 speed and has increased kill probabbility for a single missile , Infact the Landbased BUK-M2upon which the Grizzly is based has limited ATBM capability as advertised by the Russians and in dire situations can perform as AshM WITH A RANGE OF 25 kM IN Top Attack Mode , Each MR-90 Orekh FC radar for ****il-1 is capable of providing guidance on 2 targets , the ****il-1 is capable of Attacking 6 Targets with 12 missile , to increase the kill probability , The IN has decided to Standardise its Medium Range SAM based on the ****il system , considering 9 ships will be carrying the System ( 3 Delhi + 3 talwar + 3 banglore ) , Although On paper it doesent looks as Potent as The Aster , Only the end user knows the real potential of this SAM , and Since the IN has decided to Standerdise on this SAM , it has to be something .The Aster will come when it comes and most likely from all the Sources It will be installed on the Follow on P-17 class the P-17A , The only Strange thing i find is that the VL ****il-1 has been quoted a Range of 32 Km far less than its instrumented range of 45 Km.
The P-15A will be stealth to an extent that it will have angeled Surface and probably all the good features gathered from the P-17 class like machinery will be mounted on noise and vibration proof mounts to reduce acoustic and vibration signatures.Low IR signature and IR supression system , so it will have certain LO character and not stealth in the real sense only the DD-21 and Type-45 are truly stealthy in design and only future Naval Ships Designed from scratch and Stealth in mind will be truly stealthy , Also The Navy has been pretty impressed with the Hulls of P-17 class and all future ships of IN will be based on this hulls.
Interesting to see they have continued to go for the 9M38M (SA-N-7) on the P-15A (as with the P15 DELHI). I wonder if they ever considered the 9M317 (SA-N-12) as fitted on the TALWAR class. Was it a commonality issue?
Can the magazines that feed the 3S90 launcher for the SA-N-7 take the SA-N-12 as well, or do they require a different fit? Also, can the same MR-90 (Front Dome) FCR be used for both? If so, then the Indians have some flexibility in air defence considering the range difference between the two missiles.
Hey there is some confusion here glen , The ****ill-1 is basicly the SA-N-17 Grizzly or Navalised version of BUK-M2 with a range of 45 Km the Talwar do carry the ****il-1 , the Delhi class carries the older SA-N-7 Gadfly, which has a max range of 35 Km , so both the Talwar and P-15A carries the modernised SAM , but it seems that For VLS system the range has been reduced some what by 35 Km max range all things being equal , May be down the line Delhi will get the upgraded sam , ie SA-N-17 Grizzly , The Single Arm launcher on Talwar fires the Grizzly with a Max range of 45 Km as far as Kashtan-M yes the missile is strored below deck and can be autoloaded after it has fired all it SAM.The Aster -15/30 will see it way in the next batch of P-17A as the contract has already been signed with MBDA as reported earlier .
..also what about the russian counter sub to the virginia class i heard about it a long time ago is there one or not
The Russian Counter to Virginia will Improverd Sevrodivinisk , but before that the Sevrodivinsk should be commisioned by 2005 if all goes well , ever one in the business is eager to know more about the sub , some of the known thing are 12000 plus tons displacement , Monoblock reactor ( does not need refulling through out its life ) , Spherical Sonar (Active/passive ) , capability to fire vertical launched missile about 24 of them , more silent than the Akula-2 which itself has passed the silencing of the improved losangeles class, well the remaining specs is a mystery .
As far as ATV goes , Its definately more than plain vanila SSN , if Naval Forces iv/2002 is to be believed also recent selective press leaks and the navy recently released Strategic Doctorine , according to Naval Forces it will displace 9000plus tons submerged , besides being able to fire VL Bhramos , a modified version of Agni with a range of more that 1000miles with SLBM capability is being developed , it will be a sort of combined SSN/SSGN/SSBN capable sub.
Just got a latest issue of Force ( an reputed Indian magzine on defence matters ) has articles on P-15A and other Naval Issues includuing P-75 will post it as fast as I can.
Glen , India is paying for the two Incomplete Akula-2 , and it will be leased for a period of 5 years , the deal has already been signed along with the Groshkov deal , Although it was deliberate kept low profile coza of the significant impact it would have , The First Sub will be handed out to the Indian navy by 2005 with the second following it , There is also an option to buy the third one , if india wishes to exercise it , The Akulal’s will be armed with the Bhramos missile and will be a training ground for the ATV crews as also maintaining the third under water leg of Triade , Needless to say it will have significant impact in the region , need to see how china will react to it as also the reaction of US , such top class SSN will definately cause concern for the region and as far as Australia , Australia has raised concern many a times by the build up of the indian navy although thing are improving lately , What ever it is it will give the indian navy a significant punch to strike deep in lands and take control of the Indian Ocean to a great extent.
SCORPENE CONVENTIONAL SUBMARINE
The Scorpene submarine has been jointly developed by DCN of France and Bazan
of Spain. Two Scorpene submarines have been ordered by Chile. Construction
has been started at the DCN shipyard in Cherbourg for the first to be
delivered in 2004, and at the Cartagena shipyard of Bazan in Spain for the
second with delivery in 2005.
SCORPENE FOR THE CHILEAN NAVY
The 1500t Scorpene being built for the Chilean Navy has a length of 66.4m.
It is not being fitted with the air independent propulsion system. The two
vessels are being equipped with four diesel generators providing more than
2,500kW using GM synchronous motors with permanent magnets.
The Chilean Scorpene will not use a towed array sonar but is equipped with a
flank array sonar. The six torpedo tubes will be capable of launching German
SUT torpedoes, F-17 Mod 2 or Mk 48 torpedoes and SM-39 missiles.
WEAPONS
Scorpene is equipped with six bow located 21in torpedo tubes providing salvo
launch capability. Positive discharge launching is by an air turbine pump.
The submarine’s weapons include anti-ship and anti-submarine torpedoes and
anti-surface missiles. 18 torpedoes and missiles can be carried, or 30
mines. The handling and loading of weapons is automated.
COMBAT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The SUBTICS combat management system, with up to six multifunction common
consoles and a centrally situated tactical table, is collocated with the
platform-control facilities. The combat management system is composed of a
command and tactical data handling system, a weapon control system and an
integrated suite of acoustic sensors with an interface to a set of Air
Surface Detection sensors and to the Integrated Navigation System. The
system can also download data from external sources.
The Integrated Navigation System combines data from global positioning
systems, the log, depth measurement and the ship’s trim/list monitoring
system. The Scorpene monitors the environment, including seawater density
and temperature and the submarine’s own noise signature.
SONAR
The vessel’s sonar suite includes a long-range passive cylindrical array, an
intercept sonar, active sonar, distributed array, flank array, a
high-resolution sonar for mine and obstacle avoidance and a towed array.
CONTROL AND MONITORING
All submarine handling operations are carried out from the Control Room. The
vessel features a high level of automation and surveillance, with automatic
control mode of rudders and propulsion, continuous monitoring of the
propulsion systems and platform installations, centralised and continuous
surveillance of all potential hazards (leaks, fires, presence of gases) and
the status of the installations that affect safety while submerged.
CONSTRUCTION
The submarine incorporates a high level of system redundancy to achieve an
average 240 days at sea per year per submarine. The maximum diving depth is
300m, giving the commander more tactical freedom than previously available
on conventional submarines. There is no limit to the duration of dives at a
maximum depth, other than the power systems and crew limitations. The
structure of the submarine uses high-yield stress-specific steel which
allows for as many dives to maximum depth as necessary.
The use of high-tensile steels has reduced the weight of the pressure hull,
allowing a larger load of fuel and ammunition. The reduced complement
minimises training costs and increase combat efficiency by making more
space, while a larger payload enhances the ship’s autonomy.
When dived the Scorpene has low radiated noise which permits improved
detection ranges of its own sensors and reduced risk of detection by hostile
sensors. The low radiated noise is achieved through the use of advanced
hydrodynamics with an albacore bow shape, with fewer appendages and an
optimised propeller.
Between the suspended decks, the equipment is mounted on elastic mountings
wherever possible, and the noisiest systems have a double-elastic mounting
to reduce the risk of their noise profiles being radiated outside the
submarine. The shock-resistant systems have been developed from systems
incorporated in advanced nuclear-powered submarine designs. The low acoustic
signature and hydrodynamic shock resistance give the Scorpene class the
capability to carry out anti-submarine and anti-surface ship warfare
operations in closed or open sea conditions, as well as the capability of
working with special forces in coastal waters.
ACCOMMODATION
The total ship’s company is 31 men with a standard watch team of nine. The
control room and the living quarters are mounted on an elastically supported
and acoustically isolated floating platform. All living and operational
areas are air-conditioned. The submarine also has space for six additional
fold-down bunks for special operations crew.
The vessel is especially equipped with all the necessary systems to provide
vital supplies, water, provisions, regeneration of the atmosphere, to ensure
the survival of all the crew for seven days.
The ship is equipped with full rescue and safety systems. A connection point
for a diving bell or Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicle (DSRV) allows
collective rescue operations.
STEALTH
The planning and design of the Scorpene was directed towards achieving an
extremely quiet vessel with a great detection capability and offensive
power.
The forms of the hull, the sail and the appendages have been specifically
designed to produce a minimum of hydrodynamic noise. The various items of
equipment are mounted on elastic supports, which are in turn mounted on
uncoupled blocks and suspended platforms. The isolation also provides better
shock protection to the equipment.
PROPULSION
The Scorpene has two diesel generation sets providing 1,250kW of power,
mounted on an elastically supported platform. At the top of the hull
immediately above the diesel generator sets is a Dutch Breach machinery
shipping hatch. The submarine has an elastically supported 2,900kW
electronic engine.
There are two variants of Scorpene, the CM-2000 with the conventional
propulsion system and the AM-2000 equipped with air-independent propulsion.
The AM-2000 is capable of remaining submerged on underwater patrol for three
times longer than the CM-2000.
AIR INDEPENDENT PROPULSION
A conventional diesel-electrical submarine sailing underwater is difficult
to detect. However the need to come repeatedly to periscope depth to
recharge the batteries using the diesel engine greatly increases
vulnerability by both its aerial detectability, because the snorkel
projecting from the water is detectable by radar, and its underwater
detectability due to increase in radiated noise from the working diesels.
The ratio between this time of greater vulnerability and the total operating
time is known as the “indiscretion rate” and for all conventional modem
submarines the indiscretion ratio ranges typically from 7 to 10% on patrol
at 4 knots, and 20 to 30% in transit at about 8 knots.
To lessen the submarine’s vulnerability, the vessel can be equipped with an
air-independent propulsion system such as: the Stirling engine, the fuel
cell, the closed-circuit diesel and the Module d’Energie Sous-Marine
Autonome (MESMA) system .
The MESMA anaerobic system, in which heat in the primary circuit is produced
by burning ethanol with oxygen, can be easily installed either at the start
of the submarine’s construction or in a later modernisation to convert the
CM-2000 to an AM-2000 build standard. With the MESMA system the AM-2000
submarine can stay down in underwater patrol three times longer than the
CM-2000. Its performance features remain the same in all other respects,
except that the length increases to 70m and its submerged displacement to
1.870t (against the 61.7m and the 1,565t of the CM2000).
The Scorpene submarine has been jointly developed by DCN of France and Bazan of Spain.
1) How far has the Mig-27 upgrade progressed and what are the features added.
HAL has signed tripartite MOU with IAF & DARE ( Defence Avionics & Research Estb) for upgrading 50 of the newest Mig-27M , by integrating Modern Navigation , Attack & Electronic Self Defence system. The upgrade will take in 2 phases , 2 A/C will be upgraded by HAL and remaining by HAL’s Nasik division , The first modified & upgraded A/c has been flown recently by ASTE pilots. Features Includes
1 ) Three color AMLCD 5 inch display
2 ) Inflight refulling
3 ) Litening-2 LDP being integrated
4 ) Capibility to carry Modern A2G and A2A WEPON
5 ) New Wide Angle HUD
6 ) A New Hal built HOTAS
7 ) Pod Mounted Komar Radar
8 ) New Mission Computer and 1553B Data Bus ( Similar to Tejas )
9 ) NVG compatiable Helmet Mounted Display
10 ) New Onboard Oxygen Generator System
11 ) Embedded GPS/Laser Ring Gyro Navigation System
Similar upgrade is being carried on all the 5 Squadron of HAL built Jag , Except that Jag will have single 6 inch AMLCD (Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Display) also it will not carry any Podded Radar
2) How many Bison have been upgraded to the -93 standard.
So far 60 plus
What is the final status of the Hawk AJT.
After finalisation of contract on 26 March , Hal has began preparation for licence production of Hawk Mk 132 AJT its Adour Mk871 turbo fan engine and various Avionics , Total 42 A/C will be licenced manufactured , The First Batch of Pilots will leave for UK next month to train on Hawk
5) Are the Mig-29’s due for any upgradation.
Just the statement of intent so far from the IAF
Any further news about the plan to co-develop a 5th Gen fighter with russia.
The Russians are Designing the A/C , if it suits the IAF ASR we will proceed further and co-develop the aircraft aircraft according to HAL chairman NR Mohanty in the latest issue of Vayu
What are the no of Aircraft that make up an IAF sqdn including reserves.
Think its 20 Aircraft including 4 reserves , not sure though
With the planned retirement of a no of Sqdns what will be the force levels of the IAF by 2006.
Cant predict the force levels , But in the next three years 60 older Mig-21 will be withdrawn .
How many new Jaguars have been built by HAL.
Think its total 37 new upgraded Jags mentioned above being buit by HAL , 20 twin seater ( IB ) and 17 single seater IS .
Which aircraft will the Mirage-2000-5v’s replace if bought.
Not any particular aircraft as such , Just to Plug in the Gap that will arise out of 60 less mig , Cater to IAF future goal of 60 squadron by 2030 and mainly for Strategic Wepons Delivery Platform for the recently fromed Strategic Forces ( aka deliver Nuclear Wepons Deep Inside Pakistan and China )
Any info on the proposed HAL Awacs aircraft mounted on a brazalian aircraft.
Yes , Similar to Erricson Eryierie , and carrying a Top Mounted Active Phased Array Radar built by DRDO , Having an Instrumented Range of 290 miles against a Fighter sized aircraft , will carry a range of ESM/COMIT/SIGINIT equipment , Though not as capable as Phalcon.
Just read a small tit-bit about MCA from latest Vayu Aerospace Review , it says about Kota Harinarayan as saying the MCA will be a tailless design , greater emphasis on Stealth , will be carrying internal wepons , will have super cruise and will be fitted with an uprated version of Kaveri with TVC capability , goes on to say that each M2000 aircraft cost around Rs 200 crore each and instead of buying its replacement its better to design & develop an aircraft here ,also says that some of the technologies mentioned above are already avilable for the LCA , also mentiones that the MCA will replace the Jags and Mirages and the project is right on Track
Can you explain to me how the MFI is actually stealthy? The canard will make it less stealthy and by looking at the plane, it isn’t even that stealthy. The Russians were going to depend on anti-radar technologies for stealth but it seems like this won’t work so a stealthy design is a must. Right now the MFI is not as stealthy as the JSF, mind the Raptor.
It seems like the PAK-FA will be a JSF-like fighter competing with the JSF in sales. It is a double engined aircraft, and would be like the Mig-29 in class which aswell is between the size of the F-16 and F-15. It isn’t a F-22 class fighter which I doubt the Russians are even developing.
The Russians are the master of aerodynamics? Its pure opinion, and many can say the Americans are the master of aerodynamics aswell.
MFI ie Mig-1.42 and not 1.44 which is being flight tested , was suppose to be and is stealthy , but not as stealthy as the F-22’s are , simply because the Russians didnt highly believed on stealth as the most important factor , they wouldnt compromise on monuveribility for stealth , they believed in an aircraft which was balanced which means it had good monuveribility, stealth,range, excellent ECM/EM , good warload capacity and high thrust to weight ratio and lastly they were developing and are developing a range of new wepons for their 5th gen a/c , the americans gave high priority to stealth with other factors & capability included , but stealth was to be the no 1 factor in their a/c , so the difference between mig-1.44 & f-22 , also the Russians had been quite sucessful in developing RAM and so called Plasma Stealth for A/C , The PAK-FA will be more in the class of F-22 according to revised estimate , check on the forum for it there was a link for it. If you compare F-15 & Su-27 suerly you will realise that the 27 has better aerodynamics feature and monuveribility then the F-15 , even conceded by the Americans , Even a first look at Mig-1.44 will tell you its aerodynamics is better the F-22 , of course the latter being highly stealthy .
Do you doubt Russia ability to built a 5th gen fighter , after all they had their Mig-1.44/42 ready to compete with the F-22 , would not like to go in to the merit of these A/C but they I mean US & Russian have been doing this for the past 50yrs to compete against each other , What has holded them is the Funding problem after the break up , and this is where the role or India come in , that is to co-develop the PAK-FA , synergising their development in their respective field , As you know India has good super computer facility and core competency in Electronics , well as Russian are master or Aerodynamic , Engines etc so there in lies the synergy and funding will be equally shared , I do expect the PAK-FA to be equals at least and may be better considering the developement which has taken in the past 2 decades in AirCraft developement etc or better in some respect to F-22, But all said and done The F-22 is a flying A/C and will be in production shortly and will be the masters of the sky till and when the PAK-FA comes .
It dosent matter when the PAK-FA will be put in to production 2012 looks very optimistic ,2015-16 sounds pratical, One good changed that PAK-FA has made since its initial conception , is that it will be in a class of F-22 Raptor rather that F-35 , so twin engine anf all the features you can expect out of a 5th generation fighter , More ever it will help Russia compete in the 5th gen market in the future , or else F-22 will become the undisputed king, It is all win win situation for India , PAK-FA will be most certainly replacing the 29’s and M2000 , with the MCA doing the same for the Jags & 27 , so kind of India will be having 2 fifth get Fighter the PAK-FA being the most advance 5+ gen fighter and MCA being the lesser cousin perhaps more stealthy
—-AusTin
So now they have to use the term Sucessfull and Very Sucessful or Immensely Sucessful to define Sucess ,is it , If you go throu all the news report , You will find that the test were sucessful with new Guidance , This is specially good news for the Navy , since the Army & Air Force didnt have any problem with the missile , So good news for the Navy at the right time , That 50Km range is just crap Trishul is a short Range quick reaction missile with a range of 9 km and nothing more than that
The Indian Navy planned to use Trishul on its new P-16A Bhramaputra class frigate , but due to the guidance issue of the missile they opted for Barak ,and since then went for Barak in a Big way namely on Virat , all the Delhi class and in near future the Kashin will be upgraded with Barak , The great advantage of Barak is that the system is modular and can be fitted on the vessel with sufficient Space & size which is not the case of Trishul , But now since the Guidance issue has been solved atleast some other ships may & can be fitted with Trishul , the Navy is the only service which supports indegenous product whole heartedly , The only solution is to Modularise Trishul ,make it VLS capable system , System For System the Trishul is a much better system than the Barak
Hi All , Trishul Missile is perhaps the most sophisticated short range missile ( 300mtrs-9000mtrs) of its kind , It has a Top speed of Mach-4.5 , and its a very agile missile made entirely of maragning steel capable of with standing high G-loads , It has a powerful Ka-band Guidande , capable of burning throu most of the countermeasures , Thats true for all k-ka band frequency , It uses a Fly-Catcher antenna for survellence , Tracking , and missile guidance , It uses command-guidande as a means of guiding missile , Till now the Naval system had guidance problem and as oon as the missile used to be launched it went erratic , But now DRDO has seemed to have solved it with the new guidance system , Both the Army and Airforce wiill use it as Anti-Aircraft , Anti-Cruise missile Missile replacing in the long run the Russian SA-8/13 , But the Naval variant which has an interesting role as anti sea skimmer role, Capable of hitting Subsonic & Supersonic missile (Even the barak dosent have capability to hit supersonic dancing AShM ) its way better than Barak missile as it has higher speed M-4.5 as against M-1-1.5 and is more agile & monuverable , Though both of them uses the same Band namely K-Ka for guidance , DRDO is developing a VLS system , A phased array antenna , currently it is using a conventional rotating antenna , and also trying to increase its range to 15km ofcourse I am talking about Improved version of the system , The system in its present form server the purpose well for all the three services
Matt the MCA is not a paper tiger , lot of research and development work is going on in this front and enough funding is being provided , DRDO is very much upbeat abt it after they have tasted sucess with the LCA , Primarly ment to replace Jags & 27 (more than 250) , it will have 80 percent comonality with LCA in terms of Avionics , Composite Structure and an twin Uprated Kaveri engine (90-95 kn) class . Internal wepon carrying capability , weapon load of 6-7 tons , tailless design which makes it very challenging and kind of first , with long range &, supercrusie capabilitry , It should not be confused with PAK-FA which is althogether a different project F-22 class and predominantly a air superiority fighter with multi role capability and MCA being a Fighter Bomber , and PAK-FA will replace the 2000 and 29 etc and also to acheive the goal of increased squadrn strength
of 60 as stated by the ACM by 2015-20 .