more at http://www.donaldsensing.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200120181

Originally posted by ISIS
Now you get it 😀 🙂

What, that’s it? A poor attempt at humour to mask a lack of anything substantial to say …

Rather sad really, people who believe such crap are in good company with the likes of former KKK member David Duke. Here’s a good quote for you ISIS, about people who maintain such opinions :

Jews and War
“They’ve lost an argument. They lost it on the merits and they don’t like it. In their arrogance or bitterness, they assume they couldn’t have lost the fight fairly, and so they look for whispering neocons and clever Jews (or, in other contexts, nefarious oil traders). This is an ugly, ugly way to argue because it forces the opposition to prove a negative and it questions the patriotism of people who’ve never said an unpatriotic thing. In short, they are sore losers.”

Re: The Weird Men Behind George W Bush’s War

Originally posted by ISIS
It is not clear that George W fully understands the grand strategy that Wolfowitz and other aides are unfolding

Ah yes, the impending liberation of Iraq is the result of a conspiracy by a Zionist cabal colluding with Israel to ensnare the US in a series of wars that are not in America’s interests. Zionist conspirators, some of whom hold subcabinet-level positions in the Bush administration, are behind it, but the rest of the administration and the majority of Congress have no clue and thus have been duped by the Zionist plotters into thinking the war has a significant chance of success.

But why stop there?
How is it then that these cabal members have managed to fool virtually the entire political leadership of the United States?
The answer is obvious : There’s one other man who is crucial to the success of the Zionist cabal’s efforts: Saddam Hussein. He has spent 12 years defying U.N. resolutions and building weapons of mass destruction, creating the rationale for invasion, and who benefits? Israel! Obviously he too is a tool of the Zionists !!!

It’s not as if it hasn’t been said before, but I’ll say it again: conspiracy theories are for losers;Or worse:
Whispers blaming the war on a Jewish cabal have got a little louder

All in all, the usual New Statesman crap, the paper already had to apologize for one previous cover story blaming everything on the Zionists, nothing new here.

Despot or Sexpot

I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss the moustached (although I don’t think Thatcher would make an appearance) :

http://www.blogjam.com/despot_or_sexpot/

try this

Hi all, try this :
Open Google, write “French military victories” and press “I’m feeling lucky”

😀

Looks promising indeed – I even took the opportunity to try on a new Avatar …

RE: GeForce

> The country where you can buy a marriage license and be wed by
> Elvis?

What’s wrong with being wed by Elvis? It’s actually a life long fantansy of mine. Maybe one of the American friends can help me out here, is it possible to find an Elvis Rabbi?

—————————————-
” So you think you are strong because you can survive the soft cushions. Well, we shall see. Biggles! Put her in the Comfy Chair! “

RE: Ohh boy

> BUT I would just put one thing straight: The belgian government
> CANNOT and MUST NOT be dishonoured by that, because here, Justice
> and Government (if you prever, executive part and legislative part)
> are independant.

Frank, I think you misunderstand the very essence of the problem, and from reports in the media it would seem the your government does too (or is at least playing stupid). The recent court decision is a catalyst, not the cause, and this has nothing to do with the separation between judicial, executive and legislative arms.
The fact that your judicial system engages in politics in legal robe is indeed regrettable, but that’s your problem, not anyone else’s. The real problem is not with your judicial arm but with your legislative and executive arms. The role of the courts is to uphold the law of the land as put down by your parliament. If anyone is going to lose face, it will be precisely your government and your parliament, for passing laws that allow your courts to persecute anyone they wish, without any relevance to Belgium whatsoever, for their self appointed role as the judge of nations. This whole affair is entirely political, not judicial, and it will mainly affect the political echelon.

> Now, the problem is going backwards without loosing face.

Indeed, that would be best, although I fear that time may have already passed. No one forced Belgium’s hand; no one made Belgian legislators pass such arrogant laws. Belgium’s parliament cared nothing for what other people and nations think of its self appointed role, and I suspect no one will give a second thought to preserving Belgian honor either.

The effort to put Ariel Sharon on trial in transparently political, and the arrogance that prompted a decision to try anyone you wish in your courts will only end up backfiring in your face. Israel has already recalled its ambassador from Brussels, what do you think other nations will do when you attempt to prosecute their leaders? Your courts already have several dozen cases pending, and with a possible war in Iraq soon, how long before someone tries to prosecute American and British leaders? Do you really think the US or Britain will accept your “moral authority”? Will they allow you to put their leaders on trial? Doesn’t anyone in Belgium see the inherent stupidity of this law?

—————————————-
” So you think you are strong because you can survive the soft cushions. Well, we shall see. Biggles! Put her in the Comfy Chair! “