Fuel system T-50

Side view 7.0 sq. m
The top view 47.5 sq. m
The front view 4.3 sq. m
Volume calculation (7.0 * 47.5 * 4.3) ^1/3 = 11.3 cubic m

Volume 11,3 cubic m
Weight of fuel 11.7 * 0.785 = 8840 kg

Attention! This technique allows calculating volume of a difficult figure with accuracy of 3 %. The volume of simple figures (a cube and a sphere so forth) should be counted, in the traditional way – the error is very great.

MiG-29K In 1991 has not been finished to a batch production, the locator demanded operational development. Also there were two unexpected factors which have led to victory Su-27K, brake hook MiG-29K tore a cable of the brake and pilot MiG-29K has cleaned the chassis after planting to the ship.

how did you calculate volume if you even don’t have cross-sections? asking because your final figure is not correct

The dear opponent, I is ready to hear true number! And you to name ready it? : D

http://paralay.com/ngf/ngf.html

At F119 small degree by-pass ratio 0.2 (izd.117 ~ 0.6), the big losses because of the S- shaped channel and absence of adjustment, power loss in a flat nozzle.

paralay u are saying su-27 carry more fuel than t-50 but sergei bogdan has said the opposite

You inattentively read 😉

Weight of fuel T-50
Maximum – 8700 kg + Pendant fuel tanks in the basic compartments of loading – 2 * 2000 kg = 12700 kg

Maybe my understanding is poor, but how can ‘pendant’ be ‘internal’?