what bits do you need we have a few canopies with one side or other broken so you would have to strip them out yourself.Not an easy jobif you have ever done one.
Mike E
XG743 restoration project.
according to another web forum the aircraft has been acquired by the guys at Bruntingthorpe and is due to be moved very soon.
thanks for the photo mark 12
To add to Mark12’s info on 303 Sqn when W3764 was being flow by Plt Gladych, the link below shows he shot down a Fw190 on 24/10/41 when flying RF-Q
http://www.aviationart.pl/signatures/116.html
Chris
thats a little confusing as one entry we have tracked down states on that day he shot down a BF109 flying this aircraft ??.
Unless he shot down more ??.
Any ORB’s available for these squadrons that might show more action ??.
It would be nice to have detailed history to accompany the aircraft we have depicting this
special machine.
Mike E
We are on the doorstep and know this aircraft very well.
Perhaps an on forum syndicate could buy the aircraft or contribute
like the 748 at Liverpool.
She is far from being a potential flyer ,she has a good few none standard bit and pieces and
she was not in fantastic condition.
Mike E
Perhaps one day they may consider every aircraft in museums potential weapons.
And those of us with live aircraft may be considered potential suicide bombers !!!!!!.
I think it shows the sad state of the world and the attitude of authority in this country
with some very OTT responses to situations that would just require some basic questions and
checking as some one has already stated the obvious saving a lot of time and tax payers money,
on things obviously not a threat to concentrate on those that are.
I wonder if he knew someone in North Yorkshire?
That person I understand is out on a good boy license and is down south somewhere as he is not permitted to return
currently to his mothers old house and the place where the incidents he was locked up for took place.
A good bit of his stuff was seized and locked up by the crash and smash team from the MOD as he apparently
did not have much in the way of permits or licenses to recover and some of the stuff he had that had deactivation
certificates for had in fact been re activated. Some of his stuff did not get seized and apparently
disapeared to places elsewhere I know some of his cockpits got re allocated or sold and we where offered two of
them including a Vampire but believe this ended up being scrapped because he wanted silly money.
It would be nice to know what happened to the rest of the Wellington stuff he had to go with the stuff
at East Kirkby as it would go a long way to 60-70% of a whole aircraft being available for a rebuild project.
Besides the other allegations against him some of it was very scary apparently live explosives etc.
I dont know the full details so dont think I will comment further but sadly there are some rather less
than honest individuals still lurking aorund the artifacts world as thefts from museums and collections
in the uk during the last twelve months proves.
Mike E
Many thanks guys and in particular Mark 12 for some further details.
Since posting the request we have been fortunate to get a decent amount of information.
This includes the fact that with 303 sqdn coded RF-Q on 24th October
Pilot not sure of ??. Shot down a BF109.
Also that after its crash at Woodvale it was allocated to 11 sott as 3386 M
and survived the war to be scrapped 14th October 1953.
Any further details on its various squadron codes and markings appreciated
as we have been asked to look at representing the aircraft and its color scheme
on our Replica Spitfire for the next year,and of course we wish to be accurate
if we go ahead with the project.
Any photo’s of the aircraft and any further detail greatly appreciated also if
anyone should have access to the article/book on the showmans guild
a copy greatly appreciated.
Mike E
The Gauntlet one looks fairly original the Spitfire one not so sure about ??.
I am no expert on documents others on here far more qualified.
The two lancs up with the BBMF Spitfires and Hurricanes as escort now I would pay good money for that photo !!!
The P6 compass was also used in the Westland Whirlwind fighter.
But we have one thanks but not sure if the guys want a spare.
Mike E
Whirlwind fighter project.
I would have been back quicker if it wasnt for the NHS not 100% yet
but working on it.
Mike E
The Pilots loved the aircraft but the fitters thought it was a little sod to work on in some respects
as Petter used some very advanced ideas for controls.One being the method of pitch change by
throttling up and down to acheive the settings as no direct selection was in place.
The rather risky idea on the early aircraft to direct the exhaust through a duct passing vis the wing fuel tanks
( abandoned after some rather nasty accidents)
One very time consuming construction method we understand from information passed down from production line workers was the method of forming the rear fuselage.It is constructed from magnesium alloy planks,these planks being it is understood hand formed over a large section of steam pipe using hot sand bags.This method of production to make the 116 airframes built was amazing but also perhaps answers the problems with production time for each aircraft.
Mike E
beacause of the limited number of air frames available the Whirlwinds where kept back during the Battle of Britain as there was so much fear at the time of us being invaded the fire power of the aircraft was felt better used against invasion barges.This is fact as we have copies of correspondence at the time between the major parties involved at the Air ministry etc..
Also a lot of discussion overlooks the fact of how early and advanced the Whirlwind was and how much of a complicated beast to manufacture it was.It first flew in 1936 and using engines of a power that was very competitive for the time as the very early days of the Merlin with the Schneider trophy having not long been won by Britain and the Spitfire very much still on the drawing board. As has been said already we have some documents and reports from later testing undertaken by RR on one of the prototypes with uprated engines but the main problem was the demand on Merlin production was so great that RR had to draw the line on the production of different types of engine as at that time the decision was taken no agreement was in place yet with Packards to license build engines. Also we have fairly firm evidence that the space under the cowls on the Whirlwind was more than adequate for the early Merlin engines with the single stage supercharger.The later 61 series etc would have meant the major redesign work to fit in but I would surmise that just over 1,000 hp would with single stage supercharging have created an evil little fighter in the hands of RAF pilots.
Mike E
Hmm,
Lets be careful here – I suspect that the two companies are not linked. I also don’t want to cast aspersions on anybody without proof.
Bruce
Was there not a similar company operating with a different name who was using other peoples projects as examples of their work when it wasnt ?? some of our projects and the Malta Museum ones being just an example.I have looked at their site at Tallyho and it seems that U Tube has terminated their links and film footage because of and I quote so there is no misunderstanding ” Numerous complaints about copyright infringements”I would suggest folks visiting their site make up their own minds. Yes the three projects mentioned are registered under G-INFO to another organisation and I wonder if the same has happened to them and they dont yet realise their pictures are being used ??,But that is purely a personal opinion and possible suggestion.
Mike E