You mean… something like this?
Close but not quite, something along the Italian GP FREEM , the Italians maintained the anti-submarine hardware and added the Kronos NVER together with an ASTER 30 capability into those “Frigates”.
Wrong topic, i know, but…
Having its AAW Destroyer fleet halved the RN could do worse than to stick something like that “SAAM-ESD” into a handfull (three or four) of type 26´s.
Something like SAMPSON and a PAAMS C2 “lite”.
My girlfriend was at work, HMV, today for just three hours, so I had to take that amount of short time to think up some evil things to do.
One of which. Shes due a new Mac Notebook to be picked up from the Apple store anyday now (her old one got damaged internally beyond repair, she spilt a full pint of milk all over the keyboard and now its Kaput, but the exterior is in mint condition) and luckily, our best mate bought one on Friday, the same model my girlfriend will be getting and the same model as the broken one. So I asked her (our mate) if I could lend all of the packaging, manuels, paper work, plugs, the Apple carry bag, the lot. So I started to wonder what I could do to the Mac. I couldn’t just put it in all the packaging without doing something to it first, and what do you know, I had a full tube of Super Glue. So I proceeded to glue the Mac shut, give it a little polish to give it that little bit more sparkle and placed it all in the correct packaging with everything else, the full works. It looked fresh from the store.
So, she rang me when she finished work to see how things were & all. And I told her that I got a call on our house phone from the Apple store in Newcastle saying her new Mac is ready for collection. And with me being a Gentleman :diablo: I said I’d went down to collect it on her behalf, plus I hadn’t much else to do and it’s a beautiful day outside. She was incredibly thankful (I WAS on a promise tonight, if you know what I mean. *wink-wink*)
So as it were she was very, very, very excited to get back home to get loose on her “new” Mac and the inevitable was about to happen…
…To cut the long story short. It was quite an experience, a lot of anger, hatred, abusive language and general displeasure was thrown in my general direction…Including the Mac and some of the contents…But it was funny and being the lovely lass she usually is, she seen the funny side of it…After about half an hour or so later. :diablo:
Was it rude of me to ask if my promise was still on offer tonight? She said something along the lines of, “Fek off, you limey wanka rectum hole booby face, pwik, fanny”…Or something.
Oh, and I tied her underwear (*Cough* “bedroom ones” *cough*) to the front door too! :diablo:
😮
You are a braver chap than i am!
Reading the above lines, you seem to do a lot of research for journalistic purposes. As this task is time consuming and requires being in touch with pilots/engineers (costly trips), I suppose you’re not doing it as a hobby. I conclude that you’re either a journalist or a PR rep from a defense company involved in the program.
In which aerospace newspapers will we be able to find your pieces with forthcoming news about these superb enhancments?
Air International, Air Forces Monthly, Combat Aircraft, Key Aero and Arabian Aerospace.
True for the SH, untrue for F 16; it
has a lower drag then the Gripen
Care to provide a drag chart for the two aircrafts?
You would lose that bet then my friend. M1.6 is the target with full load, infact I believe they may have already done it, if not they’ve certainly got close from what I remember reading elsewhere on a better forum.
Full load?
Try to use the external pylons and load them… And then try to coach the F-35 into Mach 1.6.
And if you have problems with this forúm, you can always leave…
UUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
So, five years from the first sketches to full production.
Fifteen months from first sketches to first flight.
On time.
On budget.
I am quite sure that somewhere there´s some law forbiding such a sorry state of afairs!
😀
Sintra – “As of today that particular criteria (360º IR night vision outside of the cockpit) cannot be met by any other aircraft”… DINGDINGDING we have a WINNAH.
Exactly. The Canucks said “zero light”. Anyone else selling fighters will say “excuse me but when are you going to do air combat in zero light – in a cave? at night under dense overcast, over water or unpopulated land?” The requirement was obviously written to disqualify anything except JSF.
You got the idea. If that requirement is mandatory, i wouldnt be too surprised if we found out that another mandatory requirement was something like “it must be called whatever thirty five and it cant be Russian”.
Making a mandatory requirement of something that is only present in one single design is a very fine way of rigging whatever is chosen.
Well, has of today that particular criteria (360º IR night vision outside of the cockpit) cannot be met by any other aircraft… So…
@Sintra
It doesn’t. Still have it on my HD.
Blimey 🙁
Thanks
why has Gripen NG the same weight as 1970s era F-16A/M2K that despite having 500kg lighter engine.
Because it has an AESA antena in the front office, an IRST, three diferent data links (TILDS, MIDS LVT and a Sat com), MAWS, internal ESM/ECM equipment, and a few other bits and bobs that a 70´s fighter didnt had…
This entire topic should be moved to the “General Discussion Forúm”.
I am quite sure that there´s some topics about comedy in there…
That or terminating it.
There are at least two independent, albeit unofficial sources stating a bearing accuracy of <1° for the DASS ESM sub-systems, maybe they are wrong, but there are no other sources stating any data whatsoever. Thus far I have just seen Rafale fans throwing around with all kind of data like you have done it, with the explanation of “no interferometry”.
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-4725196/Typhoon-arises-the-Eurofighter-Typhoon.html
http://eurofighter.airpower.at/sensorik-dass.htm
If i am not mistaken that information comes from the old Eurofighter DASS pdf, it was taken from the Selex site when it changed the name to “Praetorian”.
Further, it is repeated that they still assume the F-35A to be cheaper in procurement and life cycle costs than Gripen NG. Such statements make me a bit in-assured of the document owners (RNoAF/Governments) connection with reality.
Oh, they are connected well enough…
They cant really say “we´ve distorted the entire 2008 report number so that a 13+ ton stealth fighter is cheaper to acquire and operate than a 7,5 ton conventional fighter”, can they?
MICA offer at ranges > 50km the same agility than WVR missile like IRIS-T and Sidewinders.
At ranges »50 km the MICA is an hipersonic dart, its rocket engine long exausted, the TVC useless, so dont expect extreme agility at that kind of ranges.