dark light

Sintra

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,431 through 2,445 (of 3,443 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Sintra
    Participant

    WHY????

    WHY???

    Well, those questions must be answered by the US Government and the Us tax payer. In my humble opinion its a “bit” (a bloody big “bit”) of an overkill.

    Cheers

    Sintra
    Participant

    who can afford dozens of airfields war with all the protection?. NATO atmost could afford one or two airfields against Libya.
    The era of 5G fighters spread in dozens of airflields is over. I consider Russia/India has more stronger airforces due to better AWACS/Airrefuellers/strike aircraft and better future road map.

    If you want to discuss in a specialized public forum at least use Google, most people here have an idea of what they´re talking about, you dont.

    The USAF by themselves have more “Airrefuelers” than the rest of the planet put together, the USAF and the US Navy by themselves have more AWACS than the rest of the planet put together.
    In the Lybian campaign NATO has already used at least seven air bases for Fast Jet operations. (Gioia Dell Cole, Birgi, Solenzara, Sigonella, Trapanni, Souda, Aviano) (Actually count that nine, Araxos, Decimomannu)

    Sintra
    Participant

    Equally equipped enemy is anyone who owns sufficient assets to attack the forward bases where F-22s would be deployed. It would be plain stupid to concentrate effort on targeting the F-22s while they are flying whern you can comfortably blow them to pieces while on the ground.

    And who´s that?
    Tell me who has enough capability to, without resorting to nuclear weapons, blow into the sky a dozen airfields while at the same time penetrate the defenses of the biggest military power in the planet?
    China could give a go in a very narrow scenario, the Taiwan straights, anyone else forget it.

    in reply to: F-22 and F-35 war scenario #2321540
    Sintra
    Participant

    The key question is how many Viper/Eagle/SH will get through to deliver it’s weapons (mostly two pylons worth, IOW the same as internal F-35) and of those, how many will survive the trip back.

    To be honest, i am one of those who thinks that if the USAF had received those 381 F22 that it wanted, with the capabilty that were suposed to be added in the future to the Raptor fleet, the rest of the USAF TACAIR could be composed of Block 60 Vipers (and the Strike Eagles already in inventory) for the next two decades.

    Cheers

    in reply to: F-22 and F-35 war scenario #2321542
    Sintra
    Participant

    Vipers, Eagles and SuperHornets go in to do something useful: drop 10+ tons of ordnance on the enemy. How is the f-22 going to do that while maintaining VLO?

    Send Viper´s/Hornet´s/Eagle´s with ten tons of ordnance into a place with evolved Flankers (being used by an adversary that knows what he´s doing) without convenient ATA escort and they are dead, send those same Viper´s/Hornet´s/Eagle´s with ten tons of ordnance into a place with evolved Flankers (being used by an adversary that knows what he´s doing) with a convenient ATA escort composed of Viper´s/Hornet´s/Eagle´s and (with luck) you are going to trade one fighter for each adversary that you bring down.
    Send those Viper´s/Hornet´s/Eagle´s with ten tons of ordnance into a place with evolved Flankers escorted by Raptors and the chances losing fighters to enemy CAP decrease dramaticaly.
    Same story for Double Digit Sam´s.
    A small force of VLO supercruise fighters is a force multiplier by himself

    in reply to: F-22 and F-35 war scenario #2321654
    Sintra
    Participant

    and what would they do in that environment?

    The exact same that Vipers, Eagles and SH´s would do, with the added bonus of VLO signature, that equals to less casualties in the USAF/USNAVY band wagon, and more casualties on the other side…

    in reply to: F-22 and F-35 war scenario #2321945
    Sintra
    Participant

    Read up on Package Q for an idea of what an all VLO force could do vs what a 4th gen force did. Considering PQ was not against SAMs (and no modern double-digit ones at that) and fighters, an all VLO force would have an even greater impact against a SAM/Fighter combo.

    SpudmanWP

    Nice. That particular story is a graphic description why you dont send manned strike assets to visually bomb highly defended fixed targets. But there are several ways to skin that particular cat, other than an entirely VLO force, i mean.
    Send something with a 400kg high explosive warhead, 400 km´s away, that will do the trick…
    Moving targets and evolved Flankers, well thats another story (and another Cat, now where´s that Sqn of Raptor´s?).

    Cheers

    in reply to: F-22 and F-35 war scenario #2322085
    Sintra
    Participant

    Anywhere were double digits SAM´s and evolved Flankers would be present in decent numbers. On a “purely theoretical” scenario, its called “China”.

    Cheers

    Sintra
    Participant

    187 F-22 seem barely enough to protect US borders, and seem completely insufficient to make a real difference during a full blown war with an equally equiped enemy.

    Two questions:
    Why anyone in his right mind would use the Raptor to “protect US borders” with thousands of Vipers in the USAF inventory?
    An “equally” equiped enemy? Who´s “that”?
    At least for the next decade, something like four sqn´s of F-22 would probably be more than enough to tilt an Air Battle over any potential clash point with any existing “near peer” threat, that includes China.

    Sintra
    Participant

    The real answer should be that the F-22 would be able to detect another F-22 radar as it knows the exact algorithms that make the LPI radar a LPI radar and would predictively look in the right bands.

    Cheers

    PS no toast, cats or tape was harmed in this post..

    In that case the F-22 (1) would be capable of getting a lock and shoot down the F-22 (2) using a flying buttered cat…

    Sintra
    Participant

    Anybody read or heard anything about whether the F-22’s ALR-94 ESM can detect another F-22’s APG-77 LPI radar at long ranges?

    If an ESM that can defeat the APG-77’s LPI feature already exists, what would be tactical implications in a scenario where four non-stealthy fighters with such a capable ESM are pitted against two F-22s?

    You are not going to get that kind of answers in a public forum.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2369550
    Sintra
    Participant

    Other posters may disagree and have their points (to be fair IAF seem to agree with them), but the MRCA may run into difficulty because the IAF did not keep a cheaper option in the fray if either the F 16, Gripen or MIG made the cut we would not have been discussing the potential of a cancellation.

    You would be discussing a potential cancelation and the political strings of American equipment or the penalties of an almost totally equiped Russian IAF.
    Whatever the two final contenders would be, this kind of rumours would always appear. Just a few examples, if the Boeing Super Hornet would be one of the contenders, the (bloody) expensive FMS letter offer to Brasil would appear in this pages every three posts, if the Mig had been one of them, the price of the latest MKI batch would be dissected to death, if it was the Viper there would Indian posters stating furiously that “we are going to start receiving it two years AFTER LM droped its production altogether”, the Gripen NG would be called a “paperplane”, etc, etc.
    The MMRCA its a huge prize, this kind of “noise” would always appear.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Marinised Typoon #2370385
    Sintra
    Participant

    If the F-35C doesn’t happen – 50/50 at the moment? – here’s another option: buy MiG-29Ks, but with EJ200 engines and Western radar, avionics and weapons. STOBAR aircraft, so no need for expensive catapults.

    No marinisation required, as that job has already been done.

    And next, Iran is invited to enter the Eurofighter consortium? 😀

    Not a snowball in hell chances of that happening.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2370398
    Sintra
    Participant

    The difference is the MiG-35 is already flying with the 1064 element AESA, most of those SH advances are not yet implemented. Anyways lots of ifs and whens in this discussion, both good aircraft at the end of the day.

    Could you give more some more specifics about the “MiG-35 is already flying with the 1064 element AESA” (cant read Russian)?
    AFAIK, two months ago this particular radar (the 1064 TRM´s Zhuk) had not been instaled on an aircraft, much less flown.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2371372
    Sintra
    Participant

    Do you think that “Bright Adder” is something which the UK would take over to India for the other competitors to see? I thought it focused on the electronic attack potential of the Typhoon AESA programme for the RAF, rather than being a general technology demonstrator for the radar…..?

    No, i dont think that a prototype would be sent to India, but i do believe that some sort of hardware was shown to the IAF (probably in GB).
    Well, about “Bright Ader”, there´s not much in the public domain, but for the litle i´ve gathered it seems that its much more than an EW focused program, its a “son of ARTS” with the potential to deliver an entire radar program in case the consortium efforts goes “**** up”.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,431 through 2,445 (of 3,443 total)