dark light

Sintra

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 3,443 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The future of the European fighter industry. #2336728
    Sintra
    Participant

    The Typhoon “has alarm” since when?

    Since, well, “never”.
    And unless the proverbial Martians declares war tomorrow to UK PLC, the probability of that particular weapon being integrated in the Phoon is very dim. The useful life of the missiles is ending and the production line is closed for quite some time.

    Cheers

    in reply to: The future of the European fighter industry. #2336731
    Sintra
    Participant

    Calm down guys

    X2

    It seems that every time that someone starts a thread about European defense, it ends in a verbal slogging match about the twin Delta Canards ( yes i admit, i´ve participated in my own share of verbal slogging :D), some of the posts seem to have been written right after Agincourt or Patay…

    There´s a real problem in the European Defense Industry that “seahawk” described very well, its completely STUPID to develop three diferent fighter that are almost clones of each other, six diferent AAW destroyers, dozens of diferent armoured carriers, etc, etc, etc when the defense budgets are going into a pit.

    Cheers

    in reply to: The future of the European fighter industry. #2337343
    Sintra
    Participant

    I think JDRADM is a really clever idea, and hope there will be a Meteor II with the same dual role.

    Completely agree with that one, wrote the same thing a few weeks ago in the thread about Anglo French cooperation.

    in reply to: The future of the European fighter industry. #2337350
    Sintra
    Participant

    Do you have any proof that the Typhoon, as you mention it, is indeed capable of doing it.
    I will wait for an answer :D.

    Yes, long ago has 1998, the then DASS was being described publicly by Eurofighter (and Luftwaffe pilots) has a quantum leap over the systems used in the Tornado ECR (that was published in Air international, the month cant remember, the 1998 magazines are at the bottom of quite a huge pile of another magazines). There are a few more recent articles who mention DASS/Praetorian capabilities.
    Not to mention that the technical description made by PPP is indeed correct (and for that you can just go to the Selex site and see the latest brochures).

    A capability that today, while real is a bit academic. Until some air ground stand off weapon is integrated in the Phoon, no one is going to use it to do DEAD (trying to go after a SAM site with a Paveway IV is a bite suicidal). Untill them the SEAD/DEAD capabilities of the aircraft are not going to appear at the forefront of Eurofighter sales brochures.

    Cheers

    in reply to: "Super Hornet better than Harrier, Tornado and Typhoon" #2338617
    Sintra
    Participant

    You may want to recheck your facts on how well JASSM performs. The bugs it had, have been fixed, and….it has a longer range than Storm Shadow.

    1º Swerve mentioned that the JASSM has not to this day demonstrated the reliability of the Storm Shadow in 2003, and AFAIK thats a fact. In its entire tests runs, the JASSM has never achieved the equivalent of 25 hits and one miss that the MBDA weapon demonstrated in combat operations in 2003. To my knowledge, the best test run was in October 2009, Eglin where it achieved a very decent 15 sucesses for one miss, before that it was a disaster, by the begging of 2009 its hit rate was slightly below 60%. That confirms that the latest batche(s) of the JASSM is indeed fine and dandy has you have asserted, but i wouldnt put my hand over fire for the hundreds and hundreds of rounds produced while they were solving the “bugs”.

    2º The vanilla versions of the JASSM and Storm Shadow have roughly equivalent ranges, the JASSM ER and the Naval Scalp also have roughly equivalent ranges. If the British in the future lay a requirement for a longer range CASOM, MBDA will be more than happy to pick the Naval Scalp, drop the ejectable booster and “presto” a one thousand km air launched version of the Storm Shadow.

    in reply to: The future of the European fighter industry. #2338946
    Sintra
    Participant

    That won´t happen imho. A project including Dassault, BAe, EADS – Cassidian, Saab and minor players, will never fly.

    I am old enough to remember similar regards about the Typhoon… And Eurocopter, and the Airbus 320, the 400, and MBDA, and…
    Never is an awfull long word.

    in reply to: The future of the European fighter industry. #2339332
    Sintra
    Participant

    Are the Europeans comfortable with this?

    Yes. There´s no requirement for an air superiority fighter in the entire region that its not confortably met or exceed by the actual generation of fighters, and this for the next decade and a half (at least). The only theoretical “threat”, Russia, in the last year and a half has slashed 40% of their Fast Jet combat fleet, 1/4 of their state budget is direct revenues of gas and oil sales to western Europe, the economical agreements between the Russians and European Union countries (specialy Germany) pile up at quite a fast speed, so…
    There´s no foreseable direct conventional threat to Western Europe.
    In terms of production lines and technology, the last home orders for the twin Eurocanards will be ending of this decade, beggining of the next, whatever cames of the UCAV programs will begin deliveries right after those last fighters got delivered, after that its almost impossible to foresee the specifications for the anti air mission, it might be anything, from a manned fighter, to a UCAV, to a satelite with a solid state laser, to…

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2343884
    Sintra
    Participant

    Try: http://defensetech.org/, the second article from the bottom

    And?
    That article precisely confirms the 160 units Typhoon fleet. Todays RAF plans a five combat sqns (16 aircraft each) backed up by one OCU (24 aircrafts), an OEU (4 aircrafts) and the Falklands detach (4 aircrafts). Thats a 112 active fleet backed up by a total of 160 airframes (that are contracted, by the way), including the IPA´s.
    That article just confirms that.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2344720
    Sintra
    Participant

    That’s an interesting interpretation of events to stay polite.

    Thats exactly what happened.

    in reply to: RAF – Further reductions #2346493
    Sintra
    Participant

    my view on these fast jet reductions is that you have to look at where the UK wants to be in 10 years time.

    In 10 years time we will have F35C operating off of 65000 tonne carriers, we will have the most advanced version of Typhoon and meteor, we will have our own highly advanced UCAVs which may be operating off the carriers and other ships as well as from airbases, we will have our own own ISTAR assets and we will no longer operate Tornado.

    Its easy for people outside of the UK (particularly from the US) to look at the RAF losing its legacy fighters and the RN losing its “carriers” as a sign of the UK shirking its duties, but I would suggest that the the UK will be far more potent a threat in 10 years than it is at the moment or it was 2 months ago when we still had harriers (which honestly, really honestly people are making a little too much of i think).

    There are no plans to field a UCAV in ten years time.

    In ten years time the entire fleet of F-35C´s will be composed of one single front line sqn and 4/5 of the Typhoon fleet will be tied in the QRA mission…
    The RAF will be able to field two sqn´s in out of area missions for very short periods .

    in reply to: RAF – Further reductions #2348701
    Sintra
    Participant

    The Royal Air Police.
    What a fall!

    If this “six sqn” thingy goes ahead, the RAF will (roughly) have the same number of fast jets that the RAAF or the Spanish Air Force.
    With a bigger budget than the other two combined…
    Gosh

    in reply to: alide.com.br and base militar #2018192
    Sintra
    Participant

    Phil

    Several of the Brasilian Journalists who work on those two sites also write in this Forum. Look specifically for “Hammer”.

    Cheers

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2352443
    Sintra
    Participant

    Who would you rather believe in this matter. Dassault who has two deals worth nearly 20 billion at stake or the US Embassy who has no reason to lie to the USG in a classified cable.

    Obviously in Dassault. Or do you really believe that a massive 800 thousand pages RFP answer would be based on propaganda?

    That the French Rafale uses american components its not exactly a secret, that the core equipments of that fighter are french its not a secret either.
    The exact same can be said of the two American designs, hell, if Boeing wins the MMRCA, in theory the British might very well deny the salle of the ejection seat, and the Germans could simply stop the delivery of the blisks for the F-414 (MTU produces almost 1/4 of the entire F414 and its not exactly the metal bending part)!

    in reply to: Argentina joining KC-390 program! #2353361
    Sintra
    Participant

    Falklands defence hinges on the fact at the moment that the Argentines can’t overwhelm the Typhoon force, a decent tanking capability in the ARA changes that equation.

    Falklands defence hinges on the perceived threat of His Majestys Armed Forces backed up by political clout from Washington.
    Buenos Aires is fully aware that any British government would (military) react furiously to a direct military assault on the isles and keeps in mind that British soldiers have been fighting (and dying) right besides the American GI´s for the best part of two decades. I can only imagine what message the American ambassador would deliver in Buenos Aires after the FAA and ARA started to bomb Stanley…

    in reply to: Britains wasted opportunites #2353364
    Sintra
    Participant

    Just a couple of observations, but with these fleet rationalisations, maybe some of the capabilities and numbers wouldn’t be lost

    With these “fleet rationalisations” (!!!) the RAF would lose 60% of its fast jet fleet, would lose the AWACS capability not to mention two thirds of its helicopter fleet…
    Thank god that there is still some good sense in the British MOD

Viewing 15 posts - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 3,443 total)