I know. Even with this lame percentage the HARM still did the job, by forcing the Serbs to turn off the radards. Nevertheless, hitting a fixed ground target it’s a piece of cake vs. attempting to hit a target flying high ( 10,000m) with 0.9 M at 300 km.
With all due respect, I disagree. The newest RWR on the basic SH is the ALR 67 (V)4. It’s a full digital one, probably the best in its class (the same technology is in the ALR 69 (V)A presently installed on the F 16 blk 40/50). However, it still not produce the range. For this you need either internal ESM found on dedicated A/C (F 18G) or poded version (F 16 CJ+Harm Trageting System); equally two ALR 67, as well as 69 will be able in the near future to triangulate the position of the enemy radar (airborne or ground) using these advanced RWRs and Link 16. Aside the F 22 the only fighter that is officially known to be able to measure the range is the F16 blk. 60 for UAE.
Actually NO
Both Eurofighter GMBH and, specially, Dassault have claimed that they have that capability for years.
Has a matter of fact there´s a very big text in the Greek “Diplomacy and Defense” (or something like that) of an exercise in 2006 in wich the Greek pilots flying Block50+ Viper´s mentioned, several times, that the Rafales M were picking AND TARGETING them on a RWR passive mode using Spectra. One of them (HAF pilot) mentioned a detection range of 200 km´s…
The RAFALE has been fielding a very precise RWR in the air to air mode for several years, and i would be very, very cautious in claiming any superiority of the ALR 67 (V)4 over the European systems…
Cheers 🙂
WRT EF-2000 vs F-22A…as far as I know, the jets have collaborated, but have never went at it.
SOC
Don´t you think that it´s a bit strange (to say the least) that the newest USAF and RAF fighter planes “have collaborated, but have never went at it”?!
We a have a Raptor front line pilot that the pay comes from his majesty´s MOD, and a Typhoon instructor with a Viper Wild Weasel “colonial” background…
And a pair of “phoon´s” stationed in the USA for a couple of years… And photos of the two planes together, and the RAF openly admiting that they´ve flown together… Collaboration?!!! 😉
Cheers 🙂
Funny tough, while the USAF has been more than villing to share the raptor’s score on all other fighters, still nothing about the EF.
:confused:
What about “Sky Lance 2007”.
Raf Station Commander Atha was very clear about a exchange ratio of 49-1…
Lockheed?. I thought Boeing own the f-16 series since they brought out GD many years ago!.so this story maybe false.
Lockheed bought General Dynamics, not Boeing…
I’d be astonished if by NOW they hadn’t BUT I can’t imagine someone with the kind of clearance to be involved in developing/countering F-22/stealth tactics would spill the beans.
Exactly 😉
Doubt it. Who might comment on it with more authority than Dozer? It’s impossible to “prove” it didn’t happen, just like it’s impossible to “prove” a flying saucer didn’t land in my backyard last night and take me for a ride to M31 where I hung out with a hoard of college babes. Conspiracy nuts will believe what they want to believe, evidence or lack of it seldom enters the equation.
The Boss of the entire fast jet fleet of the RAF said clearly that the two jet´s worked together… He´s WAY up in the food chain of the fast jet comunity than Dozer… There are photos of the two plannes together, there are at least three articles in three diferent sources that clearly state that the two fighters interacted in the sky.
Now, i´m not saying that the Raptor smashed the Phoon, or the Tiffie kicked F22´s bottom´s, what happened is in “God´s knowing”, but there´s very clear evidence, unquestionable one, that the two jet´s were in the sky at the same time, in some sort of organized exercise, unless Parker was lying.
And please someone explains to me, if they were not doing DACT, what the hell were they doing? We are talking of the latest generation of FIGHTER planes, not tankers, not cargo, not helicopters…
And it´s not a question of the USAF being protective of the F-22 secrets, if that was the problem, Dan Robinson would still be flying Tornados FMK3.
If this is lack of evidence… In a court it woud be a pretty good case… 😉
Cheers 🙂
So the one official quote says:
“”If you want to say that stealth is a determining factor then Typhoon stands second to the F-22. But I think that as we do more work, the Typhoon will more than hold its own. It’s the balance of how you use it, rather than what it is.””
Don’t see anything in there that says anything about F-22 pilots crying “uncle”.
And? :confused:
It must be me… Did i ever said that some Raptor pilot cried “uncle”?!!!!!!
What i´ve pointed out his that something happened, and being honest i dont believe for a second that IF something (DACT) DID happen it was a chance encounter. It was planed by the two Air Forces.
And if so, it´s dificult to say “it didn´t happened because Dozer”…
Now, i´m not a proud member, card user, of that famous club the “PHOON smashed the RAPTOR in BLALALALALLHAAAH because some journo in Air Power Review said so”…
So vague, non-attributable “rumors” have more merit than someone who would know (Dozer)? You know I happened to hear a rumor (never mind from who because they are anonymous) that Typhoons met up with some old Mig-21s in an exercise and got their a$$es handed to them. I guess that has as much merit as the Typhoon/F-22 “rumors” eh? :diablo:
Something definetelly happened
US deployment
The RAF’s 17 Sqn OEU has routinely deployed two aircraft and around 30 personnel to the USA to operate alongside US fighters including the Lockheed MartinF-22A Raptor. “The vast majority of this work is about making sure that the integration of the two platforms is working,” says Walker. Asked how the fighters compare, he says: “If you want to say that stealth is a determining factor then Typhoon stands second to the F-22. But I think that as we do more work, the Typhoon will more than hold its own. It’s the balance of how you use it, rather than what it is.”
Officer commanding 11 Sqn Wg Cdr Gav Parker
Taking into account that the RAF has maintained a detachment of two “Phoon´s” for a couple of year´s in the USA, that there are photos of those planes in three diferent air bases, in three diferent states, that one of the front line F22 pilot´s is a bloke of his Majesty´s Royal Air Force (Flight Lt. Dan Robinson), that the full capabilities of the RAPTOR were demonstrated to the Brit´s right from the beggining´s of the YF-22 test flight´s, etc, etc, etc…
Add up the comment above by Sqn Wg Cdr Gav Parker and i would be very cautious in dismissing the possibility of DACT between those two jet´s.
Actually, one could ask, if the phoon´s weren´t doing DACT against the USAF, USNAVY and/or the Marine Corps jet´s WHAT THE HELL were they doing in the States for almost TWO YEARS? And why the jet´s and the personel were rotated at least two times? (The rotations were picked by spotter´s in the Azores, there are some wonderful photos of Typhoon´s going West in the Terceira island in 2006 and 2007)
And what in god´s name (and in RAF parlance) is “operate alongside US fighters including the Lockheed MartinF-22A Raptor”?
Is it just me, or the possibility of evaluating the latest kit against a “worst scenario threat”, sounds convincing? 😉
Cheers 🙂
So, all CEO from LM, Bae and Dassault are in jail now ? 😀
Receiving medals, more likely… 😀
And has some journo put it, the line between “corruption” and “comission” is timing…
Some of the best and most entertaining articles that crossed my eyes were written by Roy Braybrook in Air International, talking about the “old good day´s” when he sold “death and destruction” in the form of Harriers and other metal “cans”. There are some very funny stories about “comissions” in those old texts…
Cheers
the point that I was making is because someone said that the SHornet has’nt won a single open competition, whereas the Typhoon has’nt won a single open competition thanks to its technical merits either. the Austrian competition itself has come under the scanner, and in 2 other competitions in SKorea and Singapore, it was’nt the winner in technical terms either. it has’nt been able to convince Greece, Turkey, Norway or Denmark to purchase any, despite desperate sales efforts.
none of that means that the Typhoon is’nt an impressive fighter, as was being hinted about the SHornet because it has’nt won open competitions. the truth is that fighter procurement is about a host of factors, political being one of the most major.
Completamente de acordo
(ooops, sorry, i was reading in english and thinking in portuguese, new´s year´s party hangover collateral efect 😀 )
I agree.
Cheers
Austria was won because Saab goofed up, not because the Typhoon had capabilities that Austria needed that the Gripen could’nt offer. even then, it came very close to being cancelled.
as for Riyadh, that was a completely political choice and based on Saudi Arabia’s scam and kickback ridden defence procurements, hardly surprising..to threaten another nation (UK) to stop an inquiry into kickbacks or they’d scuttle the deal is rarely seen anywhere, but thats what the Saudis did- goes to show what one needed to be able to sell stuff to the Saudis and Al-Yamamah set the foundation for that..Flex has posted in depth on what kinds of things BAe did to please the princes of Saudi Arabia. :rolleyes:
The fact that Gripen went to Austria too sure of himself doesn´t compromise that it was an open competition, the Eurofighter beat off four competing offers, Dassault, Lock Mart, Gripen and a second hand Viper deal proposed by Holland and Belgium.
And about bribes, double standards,etc, etc, etc, american firms bribed Japanese Ministers, Dutch Princes, Australian political members, etc, etc, the French bribed in almost every competition that they´ve entered, and the same aplies to the Russian´s…
It´s the arm´s industry, it´s not a boy scout´s contest.
what diffference does it make that they’re not American? they’ve not won in any single open competition either.
Austria.
And what do you think that those Boeing guy´s were doing in Saudi Arabia in 2005?
It might not have been an open competition, at least for the public, but Boeing, Dassault and Eurofighter fought bitterly for the Saudi order…
Actualy, Boeing and Eurofighter are still battling each other for follow-on orders in Ryadh. 😉
Cheer´s 🙂
The split in the F-35 order has to do with production realities. Clearly, everyone won’t get there full complement all at one time. Otherwise, smaller partners would wait decades before getting any aircraft. While, the US and UK will get the majority at first and in greater numbers. The other partners great and small will have to be worked in. As for Tranche 3 Typhoons there has been talk for many years that it would likely be cancelled and only time will tell. From what I read its being hotly debated in parliament as we speak! Personally, I hope not as its a valuble asset and provide many jobs to the UK and Europe as a whole…………..
It´s a pork barrel debate, the Tranche 3 his being negotiated RIGHT now, that includes the price… If you remember the year before the signing of the contract of the Tranche 2, it was exacly the same. They can debate all they want in parliament, but the reality his that the UK isn´t prepared to leave the Eurofighter consortiun, and pay the penalties. The only way of getting out of that contract his to get a deal with the other three partner´s AND EUROFIGHTER GMBH… Not going to happen. At least part of the T3 planes are going to arrive to a RAF Base one day (might not be all).
And the split buy of the F35 has nothing to do with “production realities” and everything to do with the “spending holliday” that sudendly the Saudi deal has opened on the “Tiffie” delivery times for the RAF… 😉 (the delivery schedule for part of the “PHOON´s” T3 went to the…right, and that fit´s nicely between the two tranches of F35, but maybe i´m just getting paranoid 😀 )
Cheers 😉
As for price it will be right in the ball park with most contemporaries. The current Super Hornet goes for 95-100 million per copy and the Raptor 130+. Really, what do you think your average Typhoon or Rafale goes for? Remember, with the exception of the Raptor all are 4.5 Generation Fighters not 5th Generation like the F-22, F-35, and forthcoming PAK-FA. Also, as numbers ramp up the F-35 will likely decrease in price because of the sheer volume. Its very likely the F-35 will be built it greater numbers than the Typhoon, Rafale, and Raptor combined. (i.e. far greater):D
On the price of the F35 I do agree, but on the RAPTOR cost, the “Unit Cost Production” of the latest batch of 60 fighter´s for the USAF was a bit beyond 140 million dolar´s a piece. The 95-100 million for a Super Hornet his the selling price for Australia, so it´s expectable that the “Unit Producton Cost” be a bit smaller, and the “Unit Cost Production” of the Typhoon Tranche2 his 80,7 million per copy (http://www.eurofighter.com/news/article183.asp).
Cheers
Also, its a very good bet that the UK will cut the last batch of Typhoon’s to save money for CVF’s and F-35’s. (if it doesn’t job would be the likely reason.)
Almost impossible
The contractual penalties are huge (and we can´t forget that those draconian measures were demanded by Great Britain in case of Germany getting ideas).
The fact that the British F35B(C?) buy has been split in two with a very big time gap between the two, his a clear indication that the MOD his doing the utmost to liberate funds to that T3 order.