dark light

Sintra

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 3,443 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2131042
    Sintra
    Participant

    Official, Dave just got a new BVRAAM. The British MOD just signed with MBDA the integration contract for Meteor.
    From 2024 the RAF Dave’s will be fielding the Meteor.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2131300
    Sintra
    Participant

    This is complete and utter hogwash. The US has been steering isis into the Assad govt got a few years. That’s it. The air operation by Russia proved that.

    The poster is correct. ISIS has been caught red handed with chem weapons a couple of times since the false flag event. And it is not sarin. It never was. It was hill billy sarin. Just like the hill billy crystal meth that the proxy fighters use

    Let me see if i got this right, the USA, the chaps who have been happily bombing and killing ISIS from Baghdad to Raqqa for two years are in fact been “steering ISIS”, and “the Air Operation by Russia” proved “that”?

    I really didnt understood you, are saying that the Pentagon is allied with ISIS (and i supose AlQaeda/Al Nusra, the chaps in Idlib were from AL Nusra)? Or what you are saying is that the Americans kill those *******s across a great big chunk of Midle East and North Africa, but somehow they “steer” those SOB`s against Assad?

    That doesnt make any sense.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2131301
    Sintra
    Participant

    Just pointing out that the narrative that it was Assad who used chemical weapons against its people (without proof) and not IS is all the more ridiculous when you consider that IS has been using chemical weapons in several instances, has whatever it takes to make more.

    And yet you guys conclude that it was Assad.

    But I’m the strange one šŸ˜€

    Nic

    Eh?!

    When did i said that Assad bombed Mosul (?!) with chemical weapons?!!

    OH, you mean Idlib?
    Yes, i think there“s a very fine chance of that being the work of the Syrian Armed Forces, they have an absolutely ghastly record of turning every type of weapon against their own people, including chemicals, but for a final opinion i am expecting something coming out of the UOPCW and UNHRC.
    To be perfectly clear on this one, yes in my opinion Assad is a murdererous SOB, that a great big chunk of its adversaries are also murderous SOB“s of the worst kind doesnt give him any kind of leeway, he is suposed to be the government. And the fact that the Syrian Armed Forces, ISIS, Al Nusra, etc have used chemicals in Syria its not exactly news.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2131342
    Sintra
    Participant

    I don’t give a damn, I was actually replying to what I quoted. (But I’m a strange chap, I know).

    Cheers,

    Ok

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2131345
    Sintra
    Participant

    Wait what?

    Nic

    Sanem is convinced that a “cheap stealth UCAV” or a “40 year old F-16” can be turned into an UCAV that will be “an aircraft that has more advanced radar, optical sensors, computers” wich “it can run rings around an F-35 all day long”, that will out everything any of the severall contenders for the Belgian RFP, and all this can be made available in the Belgian Airforce timeframe to replace the Viper…

    Severall of us have been saying to him for quite some time “that doesnt exist”.

    Cheers

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2131353
    Sintra
    Participant

    Why?
    If this is your preferable metric, then the F-104G beat everything..

    The good old Bac Lightning would disagree šŸ˜€

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2131358
    Sintra
    Participant

    Good luck believing something that you have proofs of. The word for that is knowing.

    Just saying.

    That said planning your airforce is an act of belief since you have to wonder what kind of threats you will face in 20 or 30 years. And you have to plan for it right now.

    Nic

    Eh?
    You read the Belgian RFP and its scenarios? Can you point one single known “Cheap Stealth UCAV” wich will be available in the Belgian Air Force timeframe to replace the Viper who could run those scenarios?
    Its what we are discussing here.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2131403
    Sintra
    Participant

    at which point you can buy an expensive unproven F-35 or
    – a $15 million stealth UCAV that is essentially a reusable cruise missile (that was the Boeing estimate from 2005, Kratos has now been funded to develop a $3 million design)
    – just upgrade your 40 year old F-16 (QF-16 conversion is priced at $1.5 million, probably be something like that a few million more for sensors and advanced computers) into an aircraft that has more advanced radar, optical sensors, computers… than an F-35 without a pilot on board meaning it can run rings around an F-35 all day long

    ThereĀ“s no program to turn “40 year old F-16” into “an aircraft that has more advanced radar, optical sensors, computers” wich “it can run rings around an F-35 all day long”.

    That doesnt exist
    There“s no such program
    And the Belgian Air Force cant choose something that doesnt exist.

    Believing in something that thereĀ“s no proof of existance is called “Religious Belief” and no Air Force is going to include Religion in its KPPĀ“s.

    There“s an interesting read for you, Duncan Sandys and the 1957 Defence White Paper (Great Britain).

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2131882
    Sintra
    Participant

    Are you suggesting IS would use chemical weapons in Iraq but not in Syria?

    Off course they would, and there’s evidence that they’ve been using it.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2131885
    Sintra
    Participant

    http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2017/03/04/WHO-says-chemical-weapons-being-used-on-Mosul-civilians/7081488672346/?spt=rec_feat&or=1&r=5711492445739

    So who is Trump going to bomb this time?

    And of course:

    http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2016/04/22/Islamic-State-using-chemical-weapons-in-Iraq-Kurds-say/3711461333971/?st_rec=7081488672346

    (In case anyone wanted to blame it on Assad).

    Nic

    You are a pretty strange chap.
    You’ve stuck a pair of links that connect chemical weapons to the Islamic State, this in Iraq, and then you ask “who is Trump going to bomb”?!
    In case you havent noticed the USA have been massively bombing the Islamic State in Iraq for a few years now.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2132932
    Sintra
    Participant

    Excellent news; so Typhoon will finally grow up.

    It is a bit curious though that it seems Switzerland will invite Rafale and Gripen but not Typhoon for their next eval… how come?

    Ueli Maurer made a comment two years ago, when asked what aircrafts could answer the Swiss Luftwaffe needs he said precisely this “le Gripen, peut etre le Rafale, peut etre un avion Americaine, le Eurofighter nĀ“est plus le favori”.
    This does not translate into “it seems Switzerland will invite Rafale and Gripen but not Typhoon for their next eval”.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2132981
    Sintra
    Participant

    EW capabilities are definitely part of the CAPTOR-E conception, but will be phased in in a staged manner and won’t be available from day 1.

    Welcome back Scorps!

    Thanks for the update.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2132983
    Sintra
    Participant

    .
    So seeing how much you are happy with the current state of your country air force, with the average life of its planes and with its most modern fighter having the availability they have, i have nothing to add.

    You are aware that its most direct peer competitors, the VVS and the PLAAF would love to have that kind of problems instead of the ones they actually have?

    And aint BIO British? I do remember that he was studying aerospace enginering at Bristol.

    in reply to: L-159 Alca #2133016
    Sintra
    Participant

    No more likely an A-4AR replacement.

    Hmmmmm, i have the feeling that Aero Vodochody is a bit optimistic here, the ALCA would be a straight contender with FADEAĀ“s own IA-63 Pampa batch III, and even that the Argentine MOD “iced it”.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2133019
    Sintra
    Participant

    Wasn’t it the aim of program “Bright Adder” for future Uk AESA? I’m going to be slaughtered to say that, but calling Dave operational is a language abuse to me µi thought AP 79 had some capabilities in this field?

    – Yes, one of the main areas of “Bright Adder” was looking into the EW possibilities of a future AESA set for the RAF Phoon fleet.
    – On the “operational” bit, i did include “comas” :angel:
    – On the AN/APG-79, like BIO stated above it was part of the upgrade path, and years ago iĀ“ve seen severall slides stating some sort of a “future capability”, but AFAIK thereĀ“s no recent description/confirmation that a “EW module” went into active service

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 3,443 total)