Hi guys.
No flame intended here but I know E-F Typhoon took part in Red Flag with F-35 participation.
According to sources, all 4/4.5 gen fighters suffered from the presence of F-35 (I was expecting that to happen to be honest) not a word on Rafale oe F-16/F-15 topics/forums, so I was wondering is any of you had some insight as to how Typhoon did perform during the event?
Thanks in advance.
The only thing that we know is that both aircrafts were in the Blue Team
| border: 1 | cellpadding: 5 | cellspacing: 0 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| [TR] | |||
| [TD=”width: 160″]Role[/TD] | |||
| [TD=”width: 140″]Aircraft[/TD] | |||
| [TD=”width: 400″]Tail Number & Callsign[/TD] | |||
| [/TR] | |||
| [TR] | |||
| [TD]Red Team Air[/TD] | |||
| [TD]F-16C | |||
| L-159E | |||
| A-4N[/TD] | |||
| [TD]64 Aggressor Squadron | Nellis AFB | NV | |
| Draken International | Nellis AFB | NV | |
| Draken International | Nellis AFB | NV[/TD] | |
| [/TR] | |||
| [TR] | |||
| [TD]Blue Team Air[/TD] | |||
| [TD]F-35A | |||
| F-22A | |||
| F-16CM | |||
| F/A-18E | |||
| FGR4 Typhoon[/TD] | |||
| [TD]388th Fighter Wing | 4th FS | Hill AFB | Utah |
| 199th FS | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | HI | |
| 20th FW | 55th Fighter Squadron | Shaw AFB | SC |
| VFA-136 | NAS Lemoore | CA | |
| 6 Squadron | RAF | Lossiemouth | UK[/TD] |
| [/TR] | |||
| [TR] | |||
| [TD]Interdiction[/TD] | |||
| [TD]B-52H | |||
| F/A-18A[/TD] | |||
| [TD]69th Bomb Squadron | Minot AFB | ND | |
| 77 Squadron | RAAF Base Williamtown | NSW[/TD] | |
| [/TR] | |||
| [TR] | |||
| [TD]SEAD[/TD] | |||
| [TD]F-16CM | |||
| EA-18G | |||
| EA-18G[/TD] | |||
| [TD]20th FW | 79th Fighter Squadron | Shaw AFB | SC |
| VAQ-131 | NAS Whidbey Island | WA | |
| VAQ-132 | NAS Whidbey Island | WA[/TD] | |
| [/TR] | |||
| [TR] | |||
| [TD]Command & Control[/TD] | |||
| [TD]E-3B AWACS | |||
| E-3D AEW | |||
| E-7 Wedgetail | |||
| E-8C JSTARS | |||
| AP-3C Orion | |||
| RC-135 | |||
| Sentinel R1[/TD] | |||
| [TD]552d ACW | 960th AACS | Tinker AFB | OK |
| 8 Squadron | RAF Waddinton | Lincolnshire | UK |
| 2 Squadron | RAAF Base Williamtown | NSW | |
| 461st ACW | 12th ACCS | Robins AFB | GA |
| 10 Squadron | RAAF Base Edinburgh | SA | |
| 51 Squad | RAF Waddinton | Lincolnshire | UK |
| 5 Squadron | RAF Waddinton | Lincolnshire | UK[/TD] |
| [/TR] | |||
| [TR] | |||
| [TD]Refueling[/TD] | |||
| [TD]KC-135R | |||
| KC-135R | |||
| KC-135R | |||
| KC3 Voyager[/TD] | |||
| [TD]RFTTF | 92d ARW | Fairchild AFB | WA |
| RFTTF | 22d ARW | McConnell AFB | KS |
| 6th Air Mobility Wing | McDill AFB | FL | |
| 10 Squadron | RAF Brize Norton | UK[/TD] | |
| [/TR] | |||
| [TR] | |||
| [TD]Airlift[/TD] | |||
| [TD]C-17A[/TD] | |||
| [TD]36 squadron | RAAF Base Amberley | Australia[/TD] | |
| [/TR] | |||
| [TR] | |||
| [TD]Search & Rescue[/TD] | |||
| [TD]HC-130J | |||
| MH-60S[/TD] | |||
| [TD]79th RQS | Pope AFB | NC | |
| HSC-23 | NAS North Island | CA[/TD] | |
| [/TR] |
The above list may be incomplete. No list of participating units was published.
The characteristics of the radar is only one of the factors affecting the outcome of the air battle. And this factor is not the most significant. I believe that the total combat effectiveness will change slightly
There´s absolutely no public information on the capabilities of one single sensor, or on the EW suite, or missiles, of the J-10C… Zero, nada, niente, nothing…
[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”srawni_1.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3851806}[/ATTACH]
I guess that setles it then…
Quite sure that you do have access to the specifications of the AN/APG-83 and whatever the Chinese have stuck in the J-10C nose, right? Nevermind their respective EW suites, their data link capability, the IRST. and so on. Do we even know the exact engine that they are sticking in the J-10C?
Only if you ignore them moving the goalposts :stupid:
What goalposts did SAAB move?
If your answer was “delivery date”, well, wrong answer, that was moved by the Flygvapnet, not by SAAB. The original February 2013 contract between SAAB and Flygvapnet estipulated that 60 Gripen C´s would be modified with the first delivery being in the last quarter of 2018, that contract was modified several times and ended up being for the delivery of 60 entirely new builds, the first delivery being in the third quarter of 2019, something that seems to be on time.
How are J-10C and the lastest version of F-16 compare?
[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”large”,”data-attachmentid”:3851683}[/ATTACH]
There´s no public available data to make a meaningful comparison beyond something like “they should be roughly on par”.
In fact the Hawker Sea Fury, the Do 335 and i think even the Hawker Tempest was faster.
Plus the De Havilland Hornet and the Supermarine Spiteful.
If we are talking about heavily modified aircrafts (and i believe that topspeed got tricked by “Rare Bear”, once upon a time the record holder for fastest piston aircraft), that would be “Voodoo”, a P-51.
http://www.roadkill.com/mustang-550-mph-p-51-now-fastest-piston-engined-airplane-ever/
So once Finland has satisfied the niceties of a procurement competition which block of F-35 do people think Finland will start taking deliveries from?
2025?
This particular competition seems like a foregone conclusion, unless something spetacularly strange happens, its an F-35A win.
With Russia right next to its door, a decently sized budget, no indigenous product and no particular political problem with any of the five contestants, the Fins are (almost certainly) going to acquire the most advanced option, and with their timeline, any teething problems with “Dave” will be long gone.
There are a big problem. The TEMPO.
UK and Italy have F-35 A. France, Germany and possibly Spain no. So, those countries need next fighter generation being developed fastly, UK or Italy does not need, they have their needs totally covered for next 30 years.
So i dont see easy both proyects will join together on next future.
A) The UK at the moment does not intend to acquire the F-35A
B) The one who happens to have asked for a next generation replacement (AKA “Tempest”) for their Typhoon T1 fleet was Gavin Williamson
2035? its many years….
2025-2027 it is dates more reasonable for to replace harriers.
https://www.abc.es/espana/abci-vida-…3_noticia.html
In 2020 USA tells good bye to its Harrier fleet, and Spain depend of Usa for get spares for its fleet. So, it will be a problem from 2020 and forward. I dont think Spain will can to operate harriers more beyond from 2025.
Spain needs get decition on F-35B maybe next year, and do not wait more, because need 3-4 years for get first units.
Honestly, dont remember where i´ve seen 2034, might have mixed it with 2024, that was the old out of date for the Armada Harriers, but this fairly is recent, it points to 2030:
https://abcblogs.abc.es/tierra-mar-a…2A9FEF9D2.jpeg
And Spain does not have a replacement program for the Harrier, there´s no program going. There´s one for part of the Hornet fleet, almost certainly another batch of Typhoon´s, another for the C101 replacement, and the SCAF, there´s nothing else.
By parts, the oldest Hornets at Gando will almost certainly be replaced in 2025 by a follow up batch of Typhoons. The AV-8B’s of the Armada are slated for a replacement in 2034, that’s the F-35B or nothing at all, mind you, very recently the “nothing at all” was a very distinct possibility, that decision will be taken a decade from now. The rest of the Hornets will be replaced in the thirties by whatever comes out of this new program. That’s more or less what can be gleamed from the Spanish journos. If any of our Spanish friends here have more up to date news, much obliged.
Cheers
now im curious if German have its own vision on what’s look alike. Or maybe it’s the one in Airbus Video.
[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”web4-2018-4-airbus-fcas-concept.jpg?itok=PMr0Tk_3×tamp=1524673202.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3850190}[/ATTACH]
Mind you, this was “designed” around the specifications for a Tornado replacement.
The engine would probably “hybrid” between whatever German learns with EJ-2000 and French M-88.
Clean sheet
Why Germany should reconsider the F-35 participation – an opinion read from DefenseNews.com:
German F-35 decision sacrifices NATO capability for Franco-German industrial cooperation
KC-X
You can’t use DSCA notifications of FMS to calculate weapon system costs as has been discussed here many times. First, they are estimates, and second they include support, training, and logistics costs. Not to mention non-recurring expenses associated with a new operator or new version.
Hold on, I’ll post the justification book costs for the Aim-120D
The justification book/ “weapon system costs” are pretty irrelevant in this particular context, no European nation has an identical metric. And i wasnt trying to calculate “weapon system costs” (1.536 Million US FY2019). We were discussing the use of AIM-120 in Eurofighter Typhoon´s, more specificaly on airframes that belong to the original MBDA Meteor partners. I would say that past FMS letters are much more relevant for this particular scenario,
Last time I read something about their respective cost, AMRAAM was about 1M$ and Meteor 2.5/3M$
https://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/denmark-aim-120-c-7-advanced-medium-range-air-air-missile-amraam
https://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/norway-aim-120-c-7-advanced-medium-range-air-air-missiles-amraam
https://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/government-netherlands-aim-120-c-7-advanced-medium-range-air-air-missile-amraam
https://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/australia-aim-120d-advanced-medium-range-air-air-missiles
Better initial acceleration, seeker, ECCM, etc
Wishful thinking i see Spud…
There´s nill, zero, nada, nyet, absolutely nothing on the public domain that you can present to backup that particular assesment of yours.
The UK ordered 200 of the newer AIM-120Ds last year.
Read what i´ve wrote, the UK and Germany are not going to buy new batches of AIM120´s… Thats future, not past. And the “D´s” are for Dave, not Phoon.