dark light

Sintra

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 3,443 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2165623
    Sintra
    Participant

    25%

    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

    Well, thats excelent news (whatever 25%)

    Thanks

    in reply to: test pilot: "F-35 can't dogfight" #2165627
    Sintra
    Participant

    an article with fake made up information isn’t proof

    Do you have proof that the article is fake?
    If not wouldnt it be better to wait a bit?

    in reply to: test pilot: "F-35 can't dogfight" #2165679
    Sintra
    Participant

    ?!?!
    WTF. Usual ‘merican understanding of politics it seems.

    Whats the most left wing you can get?

    Communist.

    D’you think the Soviets liked their ol military hardware?

    If you wanna have a go at hippie-websites, go ahead. But there is more to the leftie side of politics than the guardian newspaper.

    Curiously thereΒ΄s this disconnect between history and the perception in some of our (American?) contributors that somehow ” political left” equals to “peacenicks”, might have something to do with the sixties.
    A cursory look at the size of the MOD budget of almost every Communist/Socialist Country in the planet since 1917 would be enough to dispel such a perception.

    Cheers

    in reply to: test pilot: "F-35 can't dogfight" #2165685
    Sintra
    Participant

    *shock horror* Strike aircraft isn’t a dogfighter.

    /thread.

    X2

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2165687
    Sintra
    Participant

    Sounds like one, doesn’t it? πŸ˜‰

    Thats naughty… :dev2:

    Option a) Production contract for the AESA

    Option b) Saudi Arabia orders another 48 airframes

    Option c) Koweit orders 24 airframes

    Option d) The British MOD goes into “sane mode” and ditches the plan to scrap the T1Β΄s

    Sintra
    Participant

    Well, you know, if the Americans were massively Orthodox and it was also a tradition to christen new airframe with holy water, some would claim that it is an illustration of hidden cooling problem. πŸ˜€

    :highly_amused:

    in reply to: F-5E Tiger II Vs. J-7G ACM #2166146
    Sintra
    Participant

    Careful there, what F5E are we talking about? A Chilean or Brasilian F5E are a very diferent proposition of a “South Vietnamese” airframe. The first time that a Adla Mirage 2000 crossed paths with a Chilean Tiger the result was not the expected one, cumpliments of the Elbit HMD and the Python 4 (this particular episode, if anyone is interested was in the late nineties, when Dassault tried to sell the Mirage 2000 to the Fach; the first time that the aircraft was flown to Chile, a two seater was flown against a recently upgraded F-5E III, the Dash HMD carried the day, this was described by Air International circa 1998).

    in reply to: Greece aircraft Industry and the Grexit #2166150
    Sintra
    Participant

    The future is bleak. By far the biggest player is HAI, a state owned company, and it’s main contracts are military related. The Greek MOD budget has been slashed continuously for the last few years and I am afraid that this is going to be a lot worse, the Greek defense industry is going to suffer proportionaly, quite a lot.

    in reply to: Future European fighter engine #2166763
    Sintra
    Participant

    Given the timelines it is unlikely they are pursuing anything radical given the lack of foundational work that would need to be ongoing today.

    Just look at the adaptive engines the US has been funding… since the 1980s with the YF120 and 2007 under the ADVENT program. Even if we took 2007 as the start date for the current adaptive engine program that means it will have been 15-20 years from the start of work until an operational engine was in service.

    It isn’t clear this European effort has any real money devoted to it yet. Once they money starts flowing it will still be at least a decade and a half before something is available for use.

    The timeline is spot on. Decade and a half is precisely the expected timeframe for delivering hardware (whatever hardware FCAS becomes), on top of that, one of the biggest players in every major “Pentagon Jet war” for the last decade has been Rolls Royce Liberty Works, and while i dont have doubts that there are restrictions between RR North America and RR Uk, i would be more than a bit surprised that a great part of the development work done by Liberty Works in things like the F136/ADVENT/etc wouldnt cross fertilise the UK future programs (pretty much what P&W and Snecma did three decades ago with the likes of the TF30/TF306/M53).

    Cheers

    in reply to: F-16IQ: Status? #2166779
    Sintra
    Participant

    And now for something completely diferent:

    Russia is training is fast , cheap and effective. you can look at Olympics. Russia per capita medal count is far better than US despite sending less number athlete and Russia is not depended on one ethinic to earn majority of its medals. This tells you Russia is far effective in identifying talent and giving right amount of training at far lesser cost.

    JSR are you sure your actual name is not something like John Marwood Cleese?

    in reply to: F-16IQ: Status? #2166781
    Sintra
    Participant

    RIP and condolences for the family

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2167823
    Sintra
    Participant

    Piotr Unicornski at it again. :)]

    LOOOLLLLLLLL

    Nice one Berkut πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Project Cognac #2167826
    Sintra
    Participant

    The 345 fits perfectly the needs here (keeping in mind that the more dynamics Alpha’s will not be phased out but kept in service with a reduced flight tempo).

    Didnt knew that, thanks. If part of the Alpha Jet fleet is maintained, then the aforementioned contenders are entirely logical.

    in reply to: Finland Air Force #2168182
    Sintra
    Participant

    4. Gripen NG will not cost 43 million, agreed. But the reason as to why the Gripen BR has jumped up to 5.4 billion is because they’ve insisted on some special solutions such as the WAD. ?

    The Brasil Gripen contract was made in Kronas, and at time of the signing the US$ had devaluated versus the Swedish currency. Right now the exact same deal is valued at 4.5 Billion US$.

    The Brasilian contract covers the development of a twin seater, a great big chunk of a new cockpit, the development and integration of a next generation Embraer data link, the integration of severall Brasilian and South African munitions, an assembly line south of the equator and the assemblage in house of a great % of the aircrafts.

    The Gripen E will be cheaper than the other Eurofighters, and the F-35 to purchase, operate and maintain throughout the years.

    And by a very handsome margin.
    But if the Finnish Air Force gets anything near the budget to acquire and operate the F-35A, thats what they are going to acquire.

    The EWG’s report left open the possibility that Finland might acquire two different, but complementary, fighter types that could potentially include specialist ground-attack or multirole aircraft.

    This is interesting

    in reply to: UK Royal Navy interested in Scorpion #2170203
    Sintra
    Participant

    http://www.intelligent-aerospace.com/articles/2015/06/textron-airland-sends-scorpion-jet-to-paris-air-show-and-royal-international-air-tattoo.html

    Pesky PR! If you apply the same rules to weapons that appeared under Typhoon then, no its not cleared. Having said which it doesn’t say it isn’t either.

    I don’t want to be backed into a corner here by the grumpy grown up crowd. If perhaps I had put a question mark on the end of the title, I wouldn’t have had such a po-faced response:angel:

    πŸ™‚

    Careful there, the po faced brigade are terrible chaps.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 3,443 total)