dark light

Sintra

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,186 through 1,200 (of 3,443 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Sintra
    Participant

    May be ask ONERA to help with curved IR sensors?

    ?

    Sintra
    Participant

    White House Says F-35s Not For Sale to Gulf Arab States

    White House officials on Monday sought to tamp down speculation that King Salman of Saudi Arabia canceled his attendance at Camp David when the U.S. made clear that his country would not be permitted to buy F-35s.

    “We do not and never anticipated this to be a summit that only focused on one capability, like the F-35, for instance,” said Ben Rhodes, the deputy National Security Advisor to Obama.

    Next, a letter is received in the WH saying something like

    “Thanks, yours Eurofighter GMBH”

    Sintra
    Participant

    This claims it was exceeded and what the initial batch cost was closer to 11 Million dollars vs a 6.09 promise. Of course there was a less of a legal argument because even the GAO claimed that the NTE definition was ambiguous at best. There are obviously many ways to look at the development of the F-16 to the F-35 and similar ways to look at the F-16 production vs the F-35 production.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkrtxDdaWuM

    BIO

    Thanks again. Saw the video three times, loved it.
    It was like seeing the APA chaps talking about the JSF program!

    I am still chuckling about the NTE, nice one for the General Dynamics pr chaps.
    I´ve went out, and found the GAO documents that were mentioned on the Video and read them, the guys who made the video did a “cut” job on them and only showed what reinforced their message and ignored the other 90% writen in those docs.

    http://archive.gao.gov/f0902a/109722.pdf
    http://archive.gao.gov/f0902b/100100.pdf
    http://www.gao.gov/assets/120/119675.pdf

    in reply to: What happened to Russia mil aviation? #2184069
    Sintra
    Participant

    This entire topic reminds me that (recent) one about the “PLAAF Crisis”, in wich someone cuts and passes parts of article in order to discuss the “PLAAF Crisis”, when it should be blindingly obvious that the “Chinese Air Force” its in is best shape ever.
    This topic its almost identical, just looking at the numbers its entirely arguable that the Russian aerospace industry its in is best shape since 1989.

    in reply to: What happened to Russia mil aviation? #2184071
    Sintra
    Participant

    Wait I thought the 12 plane order was a lie and a misquote? So everything is not perfect with the Russians air industry?

    No, but look at the ATF/Eurofighter/JSF programs at an identical development stage. Late and having production orders slashed its not exactly a Russian “only” thing.

    in reply to: What happened to Russia mil aviation? #2184073
    Sintra
    Participant

    Ruaf size is going into infinity.

    “To Infinity and Beyond”

    By Buzz Lightyear

    in reply to: What happened to Russia mil aviation? #2184075
    Sintra
    Participant

    I doubt they put money in Swiss for storage there but more likely influencing EU for buying off FIFA/Olympics or firms. Renova/Oerlikon very active there.

    EU is too small palace for Russian leaders. there is simply not enough land to build Sochi kind of imperial palace.

    and even before best of times they were not willing to invest in EU let alone storing money there.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-11/russia-was-right-shale-in-europe-has-proved-a-dud

    Oh, as always you´re good, very good… Last time i´ve checked Switzerland was not part of the European Union.

    Sintra
    Participant

    This claims it was exceeded and what the initial batch cost was closer to 11 Million dollars vs a 6.09 promise. Of course there was a less of a legal argument because even the GAO claimed that the NTE definition was ambiguous at best. There are obviously many ways to look at the development of the F-16 to the F-35 and similar ways to look at the F-16 production vs the F-35 production.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkrtxDdaWuM

    Thank you, just started to see the video, like it

    in reply to: What happened to Russia mil aviation? #2184537
    Sintra
    Participant

    A few serious comments

    a) The Mig-29 is bigger than a Typhoon/Rafale/F-35A, “light” or “small” are not a particular good descriptions of that aircraft
    b) A semi stealth fighter the size of a Mig-29 is going to be bloody expensive, ask the Koreans
    c) The Russian air force has its R&D budget tied on severall projects for the foresable future
    d) The number of light fighters that were designed for “export”, not backed up by home production orders, can be counted on one hand, the F-5A/F-5E/F-20 family, the JF-17 and the Foland Gnat, only the F-5A/F-5E can be described has a sales sucess story
    e) Mig would love to design such an aircraft, but the main problem is obvious, who´s gona fork out the cash?

    Sintra
    Participant

    The F-16 went from a $6 Million NTE price to a more than $11 Million price for the initial European customers- an 80%+ cost increase over the NTE price.

    Well, you´ve just picked my curiosity. 🙂
    Are those $11 Million in 1975 Us$? The original $6.091 million NTE Unit cost were. And are we talking about the original 348 airframes or that number also includes the 225 follow on orders?

    I guess it too should have been terminated because that was totally unexpected and the aircraft bankrupted the users that bought it and that is why its a totally failed program !

    Well, the F-16 development costs went ~10% overhead, the original IOC date was fulfiled, the unit costs for the original 650 USAF airframes went some 14% overhead, the GAO (end of the seventies/beggining of eighties) reports on the F-16 program dont look nothing like the same reports on the JSF program.

    schedule and meeting performance requirements.
    Its current program cost estimate per aircraft of $6.4 million (fiscal year 1975 dollars) is within its estimate of $6.7 million (fiscal year 1975 dollars). Moreover, the operational commands are satisfied with the aircraft’s performance, and its mission capable rates have met or exceeded Air Force expectations. How- ever, technical, operational, and program concerns and uncertainties exist. Those in- volving classified data have been

    1981 “THE F-16 PROGRAM:Progress, Concerns, and Uncertainties”
    http://www.gao.gov/assets/140/133140.pdf

    And (this is important) the countries that bought Hornet´s and Vipers in the seventies, eighties, were spending 3,5% to 5% of their PIB in defense (Fulda Gap and all that).
    The Viper and classical hornet had their fair share of problems, but the JSF trumped them by a very fair margin. Something normal when we think about the sheer technological magnitude of combining STVOL/Stealth/mach 1.6 and 9 g´s.

    It was an honest reminder of what “pains” developers, operators and the tax-payers had to go through when the previous generation of fighters were developed.

    Nice initiative, i would have brought Eurofighter and ATF examples.

    Cheers

    in reply to: What happened to Russia mil aviation? #2184996
    Sintra
    Participant

    You guys are now trying to argue that there isnt a market for a cheap Mig 29 replacement for ROGUE states .

    Oh dear… Lets hope that the Poles and the Indians dont visit this topic…

    Sintra
    Participant

    Yes some short memories….

    http://s12.postimg.org/pw5pvxm8t/NYT_July_1984.png

    http://s16.postimg.org/ixvrv4kr9/Screenshot_2015_03_13_18_32_34.png

    Well, that turned out well for the ATF program…

    I´ll get me coat

    in reply to: What happened to Russia mil aviation? #2185077
    Sintra
    Participant

    The Berlin wall came tumbling down, Warsaw Pact melted, the URSS vanished, the Russian defense budget was slashed to 1/10 of the size of the old Soviet Union red thingy, this for two decades.
    Next topic “What happened to UK mil aviation”, followed by “What happened to Germany´s mil aviation”.

    The end.

    I´ll get me coat

    Sintra
    Participant

    I think the MiG-23, MiG-27 is the answer of the Russians for Tornado ADV, Tornado IDS

    MiG-23 & Tornado ADV = Air-to-Air combat
    MiG-27 & Tornado IDS = Air-to-Ground combat

    The Mig-23 prototype was flying two years before Panavia was formed.

    Tornado ECR may be compared with Su-24, EF-111.

    Tornado ECR – SEAD variant of the Tornado
    EF-111 – Electronic Warfare (including SEAD) variant of the F-111
    SU-24 – Errrrrrmmmmm, “vanilla” version of the SU-24

    Sintra
    Participant

    Sweden press doesn’t agree with you :

    Automatic translation to english :

    rcolistete

    a) I am much better informed than the journo who wrote that piece

    b) I dont see nothing in that article that contradicts what i´ve wrote

Viewing 15 posts - 1,186 through 1,200 (of 3,443 total)