dark light

PeeDee

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 2,115 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #283275
    PeeDee
    Participant

    And he’s crying now. Along with me, because I am a City fan.

    in reply to: Earth like planet discovered #1867244
    PeeDee
    Participant

    And he’s crying now. Along with me, because I am a City fan.

    in reply to: General Discussion #283280
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Yeah, RIP. 96, wow!
    I liked him in MASH, and his predecessor.
    He made a lot of films and can’t recall a bad one.

    in reply to: Harry Morgan – RIP #1867245
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Yeah, RIP. 96, wow!
    I liked him in MASH, and his predecessor.
    He made a lot of films and can’t recall a bad one.

    in reply to: General Discussion #283282
    PeeDee
    Participant

    I reckon empty shells for the Movie.

    Or, like a free fall bomb, the prop has to spin a few dozen times to engage the detonator? It screws it up in place. This is why, back in Falklands 1, a lot of Argie Bombs bounced not banged….the prop hadn’t spun enough because of the very low level attacks giving not enough air-time for the bomb. Had they had more experience, you can manually set it very close before take-off.

    in reply to: Torpedos and Bismarck #1867246
    PeeDee
    Participant

    I reckon empty shells for the Movie.

    Or, like a free fall bomb, the prop has to spin a few dozen times to engage the detonator? It screws it up in place. This is why, back in Falklands 1, a lot of Argie Bombs bounced not banged….the prop hadn’t spun enough because of the very low level attacks giving not enough air-time for the bomb. Had they had more experience, you can manually set it very close before take-off.

    in reply to: A little advice needed if anyone can help #444642
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Thanks for the information.
    Snipped.

    I’ve never used a photo editor before, and don’t know that would be something I’d have the patience for.

    Again, thanks for the information you’ve given me. I’ve been afraid that the DSLR cameras may be far more than what I need, and wasn’t sure if the bridge cameras would fit the basics for what I do photography-wise. The information you’ve provided so far is helping me understand things that were very foreign to me.

    Rob

    Rob, go and play with a Bridge camera in the shop. IMO you don’t want to get into the depth of SLR shooting an all the editing etc. Of course, you can set the DSLR to Auto, set the sharpening up, set the picture style up……but all you are doing then is turning a DSLR into a point and shoot with a big lens.

    You may even get a good deal on a 2nd hand bridge for those ppl that have moved onto an SLR from a bridge.

    Battery life, A DSLR will probably have a better battery life. My Panasonic (FZ20 from 2004) has a terrible battery life, for a full day at an airshow I would take 3, yes 3 batteries. This canon 450 I have now will go > 1,000 shots before it’s down to 1 bar. The Image stabilisation on Panasonic is, IMO incredible, and better than Canon DSLR IMO. With that FZ20 I once took a 1 handed shot of an aircraft at 20,000 feet or so, on full digital zoom (48x). You could count the windows and read the reg. off the wing. Incredible.

    So, if going for a bridge, consider a 2nd battery.

    In case you didn’t know, Digital Zoom is only a gimmick. All it does is electronically enlarge the maximum true zoom. So, don’t get sold on a big digital zoom figure.
    I used digi zoom as a mwessabout (Like the aircraft above) or a telescope!

    in reply to: General Discussion #283918
    PeeDee
    Participant

    You could be correct. The observer is above the 2 in the 215. At Noon on one of the days it came Lol.

    in reply to: Airport recognition please. #1867833
    PeeDee
    Participant

    You could be correct. The observer is above the 2 in the 215. At Noon on one of the days it came Lol.

    in reply to: General Discussion #283922
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Yes Kev, the Command and orders were “as expected” but they were not always adhered to by the men of the action.

    in reply to: Is it true????? #1867836
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Yes Kev, the Command and orders were “as expected” but they were not always adhered to by the men of the action.

    in reply to: General Discussion #283933
    PeeDee
    Participant

    It must be Milligan.

    At the end of this clip from The Life of Brian, the sheer frustration, exasperation and defeat expressed in just his hands before he walks off is pure genius.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uywIYQEHZLs

    He was a genius anyway….
    Aah but….when the Python lot were filming in Turkey, they just happened into a Bar where Spike was having a snack on his holiday. They offered him a few mins in the movie over a beer and that was that.

    Swearing. There is good and bad. Some swearing matches..possible enhances the joke or story. Billy C is good example. Some swearing is pointless and is only added for purility….Roy Chubby Brown is good example.

    edit, just watched John Bishop, I think he’s funny. Probably because I lived in the ‘pool for a decade and understand the sense of humour a bit.

    Swearing and rudeness isn’t new. Max Wall was banned by the BBC for dozens of years for a joke with swearing and “gross innuendo” in it. He came back on TV with a part in Crossroads IIRC.

    Macintyre Mcintyre (Don’t care). He’s as funny as walking around Preston with a nail in your shoe.
    All his material is stolen…he just removes the swearing and pretends to be posh. Good luck to him, the formula works and he’s rich from it.

    in reply to: What's funny? #1867844
    PeeDee
    Participant

    It must be Milligan.

    At the end of this clip from The Life of Brian, the sheer frustration, exasperation and defeat expressed in just his hands before he walks off is pure genius.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uywIYQEHZLs

    He was a genius anyway….
    Aah but….when the Python lot were filming in Turkey, they just happened into a Bar where Spike was having a snack on his holiday. They offered him a few mins in the movie over a beer and that was that.

    Swearing. There is good and bad. Some swearing matches..possible enhances the joke or story. Billy C is good example. Some swearing is pointless and is only added for purility….Roy Chubby Brown is good example.

    edit, just watched John Bishop, I think he’s funny. Probably because I lived in the ‘pool for a decade and understand the sense of humour a bit.

    Swearing and rudeness isn’t new. Max Wall was banned by the BBC for dozens of years for a joke with swearing and “gross innuendo” in it. He came back on TV with a part in Crossroads IIRC.

    Macintyre Mcintyre (Don’t care). He’s as funny as walking around Preston with a nail in your shoe.
    All his material is stolen…he just removes the swearing and pretends to be posh. Good luck to him, the formula works and he’s rich from it.

    in reply to: General Discussion #283941
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Japan…..all cars have the St. wheel on the correct side too.
    Fancy a trip, got a waggon? The spares are worth more than the car (Sum of parts greater than the whole rule).

    in reply to: Wasn't racing guvnor, honest. #1867849
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Japan…..all cars have the St. wheel on the correct side too.
    Fancy a trip, got a waggon? The spares are worth more than the car (Sum of parts greater than the whole rule).

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 2,115 total)