dark light

PeeDee

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 2,115 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 'New' JAL Scheme #496642
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Tis amazing what the briefest flurry of imagination brings you:

    http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/826/jal01.png

    Looks good, but cheat lines are so 70’s.
    Leading edges can’t be painted either, there’s a hot air a heater mat in there.
    I love that tail design of yours, but it brings a 4th colour into the job, which brings costs with it.

    in reply to: Camera advice please. #445452
    PeeDee
    Participant

    ……I assumed he meant that.

    in reply to: Tripod advice wanted #445462
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Museums don’t usually allow tri or monopods in do they?
    I have rucksack sized tripod, but when fully extended it is useless. I also have a full size one of course.
    DO NOT buy the Jessops own brand stuff. The Tilt head stops at about 88 degrees, not 90. That will be very very annoying if you want to flick it up to portrait.
    Gorilla and a bean bag. And a Mono. You can fasten the monopod to something using the legs of the Gorilla LoL. Saves changing it.

    in reply to: Camera advice please. #445467
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Personally, unless Photography was your hobby………..I’d go for another Bridge. The pixel count will be totally adequate, the lens will give you modest wide to decent tele. No lenses to change (Or dust to get in – mostly).
    I still use my Bridge (Panasonic fz20) alongside my DSLR and I still use shots from it in competitions etc.
    Last time I looked, only Sony made a Bridge with full size sensor, but others must have done by now.

    in reply to: General Discussion #291765
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Is it France’s turn for our ships this month?
    Italy, hmm. They were 1st out of Iraq so they won’t be invited.

    in reply to: The Great GD Libya Thread #1884393
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Is it France’s turn for our ships this month?
    Italy, hmm. They were 1st out of Iraq so they won’t be invited.

    in reply to: General Discussion #291811
    PeeDee
    Participant

    HAY, where’s my hay!
    That’s a great comedy shot.

    I’m surprised he stuck his head in. Horses don’t usually like to be enclosed like that.

    in reply to: What Made You Smile Today III? #1884410
    PeeDee
    Participant

    HAY, where’s my hay!
    That’s a great comedy shot.

    I’m surprised he stuck his head in. Horses don’t usually like to be enclosed like that.

    in reply to: Camera users (DSLR) #445472
    PeeDee
    Participant

    large jpeg on Canon set for landscape gives a degree of in camera sharpening and saves time in postwork.
    Be very very careful regards legal aspect of your project, school sports ground is private land and you will need permission for each person that you photograph, it is a legal minefield and many pros have decided to stopcovering these events.
    Yes I can hear you saying that it is not logical because many parents take snaps of the event, but as soon as you start making money you have to take a pro view and cover the legal side.

    I know. We all have our CIB checks etc. even though I am already cleared for the Cubs / Scouts it needs doing for every type of event.
    We are the official Photographic team so we have vests and passes etc. and 2 of the lads are fully qualified NHS 1st aiders…altough obviously cant mend broken things or give medicines.

    As for shooting in Raw at such events, well there will be no time to post process the images on the day. The PC’s being used do not have lightroom or Canon DPP or Photoshop CS 5.
    And, I will need to use lots of continious shooting, Raw takes too long to write to the card/doesn’t write enough from the cache memory etc.
    I can make a hell of a difference to a poor Jpeg in Genuine Fractals! ;-).
    I’ve upped a 2mp picture from a cheap Kodak point and shoot, (Which was cropped more than 50%) good enough to print A3 with no discernable tiling or edge teeth. It was a portrait too, so I had to get the eyes etc. looking great.

    Short experiments today, just using MS Picture Manager for viewing….
    Camera set to best qual Jpeg.
    User Def 1, Picture style Standard.
    Sharpness at 7
    Contrast and Saturation at 1 (Might give the sat at 2 on the day if it’s dull and I might set the contrast at 2 and sacrifice some of the sharpness, acutance is acutance LoL)
    Colour tone at null.
    Results were perfectly acceptable for the needs.
    It took about 11 shots before there was a pause in the writing to card. That of course is variable to the amount of data in the picture.

    in reply to: General Discussion #291817
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Amusing given that an extinction event sized NEO passed earth in 2009, 1/3 of the distance away than the moon is…. AND it wasn’t spotted until mere weeks away…..

    Source please.

    The NEO’s I can find in 2009 were all less than 10 metres wide. That would give us a Fireball and a big shock wave but no ELE.

    in reply to: Asteroids #1884418
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Amusing given that an extinction event sized NEO passed earth in 2009, 1/3 of the distance away than the moon is…. AND it wasn’t spotted until mere weeks away…..

    Source please.

    The NEO’s I can find in 2009 were all less than 10 metres wide. That would give us a Fireball and a big shock wave but no ELE.

    in reply to: Camera users (DSLR) #445484
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Great idea, I hope it works for you.

    If you are going straight to print then you could probably get away with in-camera sharpening. Images for printing needs more sharpening than images for the web, so shooting in JPEG may work.

    If it is a disaster then you will have had the opportunity to learn from your mistakes and go on to better things from there.

    Jpeg will have to work. Between the 7 of us there will be more than 7,000 shots.
    In camera sharpening will have to work. Test day is later today, weather looks OK.
    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not green with a camera, but I don’t like jpeg and I don’t like in-camera sharpening, so I’ve never even bothered to find out which settings are best. So I was asking for clues.
    The aftermarket sales, I will of course be able to get them home, “Up” them if necessary in Genuine Fractals on Photshop CS 2. Then open Photoshop CS5 and continue editing. Genuine Fractals doesn’t work on CS5 yet.

    in reply to: General Discussion #291879
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Anyway, we’d restart the Sun with a very large Nuke.

    What was that film!! It was a flop in the Box office but I loved it.

    Edit. “Sunshine” in 2008

    Why does it always come into my head after I’ve posted!

    in reply to: Asteroids #1884483
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Anyway, we’d restart the Sun with a very large Nuke.

    What was that film!! It was a flop in the Box office but I loved it.

    Edit. “Sunshine” in 2008

    Why does it always come into my head after I’ve posted!

    in reply to: General Discussion #291880
    PeeDee
    Participant

    The solar wind will will push the sail in the opposite to the Sun, so it WILL drag like a chute.
    I know this. The context of the questionning was leading to the fact it would be as quick as a chute.

    Why should it’s mass be less as it gets bigger?
    It’s burning away, there will come a point where it actually burns more than it creates. There is a bit of both at the moment.
    As it burns away, the gases will be lighter. But I see what you are saying, where has the mass actually gone? 1 ton of “Stuff” burns. 50% of it is in gas…but 50% is in ash. Repeat the cycle….it will give you Zeno’s paradox……but the mass is still 1 ton, even though it is now 99.99999999999999999% gas. So, the gas must escape from the sun altogether, thus making it less mass. Solar wind and Northern lights will be good in those years!

    Oh and it’s Professor Steven Hawking not Hawkins
    That one aint mine.

    in the text.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 2,115 total)