dark light

Newforest

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,831 through 7,845 (of 8,156 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Which country is more advanced in engineering & technology #1924149
    Newforest
    Participant

    I thought Bombardier (Canada) was the prominent train maker? :confused:

    Hallo84. I thought I was more right than wrong:

    2001 Germany orders 40 x 4 electric car units from Bombardier
    bringing total to 100 ordered.
    2002 UK order worth $757M from Connex South Eastern for 228
    electric cars to complement the previous order of 210 cars
    bringing the total in the UK to 1434 cars.

    in reply to: General Discussion #328436
    Newforest
    Participant

    I thought Bombardier (Canada) was the prominent train maker? :confused:

    Hallo84. I thought I was more right than wrong:

    2001 Germany orders 40 x 4 electric car units from Bombardier
    bringing total to 100 ordered.
    2002 UK order worth $757M from Connex South Eastern for 228
    electric cars to complement the previous order of 210 cars
    bringing the total in the UK to 1434 cars.

    in reply to: Waco UPF-7 G-WACO #1364215
    Newforest
    Participant

    Hi Everyone,

    A friend of mine bought G-WACO some months ago. He will be rebuilding it in the near future and we’re still looking for pictures of it from the time it was still active.

    Can anyone help?

    Merry Christmas and all the best for the new year

    http://www.rar.be/future_project_waco.htm

    Nice pictures of it in this link at Antwerp. Happy Christmas.

    in reply to: Which country is more advanced in engineering & technology #1924224
    Newforest
    Participant

    I’d go for Japan and Germany, they make good cars and trains.

    I thought Bombardier (Canada) was the prominent train maker? :confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #328610
    Newforest
    Participant

    I’d go for Japan and Germany, they make good cars and trains.

    I thought Bombardier (Canada) was the prominent train maker? :confused:

    in reply to: Nigerian 737 Crash (Merged) #599529
    Newforest
    Participant

    http://www.chinaview.cn 2005-12-21 21:41:24

    LAGOS, Dec. 21 (Xinhuanet) — Another air disaster was averted in Nigeria as a flight operated by privately owned EAS Airlines was aborted 20 minutes after take-off in the country’s capital Abuja, local media reported on Wednesday.

    The official News Agency of Nigeria said the pilot had complained of a faulty fuel filter, while The Punch newspaper quoted passengers as saying the engine of the Lagos-bound aircraft developed problem 20 minutes into the journey on Tuesday afternoon.

    “The aircraft initially found it difficult to land in Abuja, but eventually landed after hovering for 10 minutes,” the newspaper said. There were 100 passengers and five crew members on board.

    On Monday, a Nigerian plane operated by Bellview Airlines made an emergency landing at the Accra international airport in Ghana after a failure in its hydraulic system. None of the 63 passengers and four crew was hurt.

    The incidents followed three other air crashes in the past two months that claims over 200 lives in the west African country, whose sky was dominated by “flying coffins” in service for more than 20 years or even over 30 year. Enditem

    Thought Bellview had been grounded, thought 737’s had been grounded, maybe they are all ‘hovering’, waiting to land.

    in reply to: Mallard crash in Miami #1365772
    Newforest
    Participant

    Latest word from the NTSB is fatigue cracking was found in the spar. Seems a bit fast to come up with that diagnosis, considering they just retrieved the wing from the water yesterday, but I’m not an investigator… maybe it’s as obvious as the proverbial dog’s b*****ks. Very sad all the way around, what a loss for the people on Bimini…

    Lynn

    Investigators: Cracked Wing Might Have Contributed To Plane Crash

    POSTED: 1:15 pm EST December 21, 2005

    MIAMI — The wing that fell off a seaplane before it crashed, killing all 20 people on board, had cracks in the main support beam that had probably gone unseen for a long time, federal investigators said Wednesday.

    “The examination of the wing roof has found indications of a fatigue crack in the wing spar,” said Mark Rosenker, acting chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board. “This crack appears to extend to a majority of the spar at the location of the separation.”

    Rosenker stopped short of saying the crack was the sole reason the right wing fell off the 58-year-old Chalk’s Ocean Airways plane Monday shortly after it took off from Watson Island for the island of Bimini in the Bahamas.

    But Rosenker said in a news conference that the crack should have been found and repaired, although it would have taken “a very serious” inspection to find it.

    Investigators removed parts of the plane from the crash scene Tuesday and planned to scour maintenance and flight records for evidence of work done on the plane.

    Flight 101 plummeted into the Government Cut channel off the southern tip of Miami Beach before horrified beachgoers.

    The cracks were in the main support beam that connected the wing to the fuselage. Rosenker said that if Chalk’s officials had known about the crack, “they would have repaired it and we wouldn’t be here today. I don’t think they knew it.”

    Crews that began raising the plane from the 35 feet of water Tuesday removed the rest Wednesday. Rosenker said inspectors would closely examine the remaining part of the support beam.

    Rosenker said the plane’s age could have been a factor in the cracking. The plane was retrofitted in the 1980s with more powerful engines, but it wasn’t clear what role if any that played in the cracking, Rosenker said.

    Chalk’s officials had no immediate comment Wednesday.

    Rosenker said the NTSB would have discussions with the Federal Aviation Administration and Chalk’s about whether to ground the airline’s remaining four Grumman G-73T Turbine Mallards.

    Seems as if the investigators know what they are talking about.

    in reply to: Alpha One Yet Again (Merged) #599539
    Newforest
    Participant

    Grey? Moggy? care to comment on whether a trip report is permissable?

    Looks as though it is! 😀

    in reply to: Wanted: Good Title to a Film #1365786
    Newforest
    Participant

    A difficult one, some suggestions that may trigger an idea, The Heavy Brigade, Harris’s Hopes, Delivery on demand, The Few/The Many, They Flew at Night :confused:

    in reply to: Rock in the Irish sea to capital of Scotland #416916
    Newforest
    Participant

    Congratulations on your successfull proving flight. This would be on Beta2 airlines no doubt. From little acorns……. 🙂

    in reply to: Remembering the Greats: Blohm + Voss BV 222 Wiking (Viking) #1365933
    Newforest
    Participant

    Tex and Jager: whilest searching for these pics I came across the Revel model, yes it is huge and if i ever find one I will not hesitate in buying it

    [url]https://www.easy
    Here is the model for sale, but don’t know if they have a submarine to deliver it to you :p

    The link didn’t come up with the picture, but you can find it with the search option 🙂https://www.easy-shop.co.uk/secured/modelactive/scripts/searchresults.a…

    And here is the correct link, I hope!

    in reply to: Helios 737 Crash #600128
    Newforest
    Participant

    I thought olympic airways had gone into admistration…?

    Apologies, Olympic Airlines 😮 😮

    in reply to: Helios 737 Crash #600286
    Newforest
    Participant

    Understand they were going to recreate the flight and try and produce the same conditions that caused the crash. This test might have been yesterday. :confused:

    Yes, this photo is the recreated flight by Olympic Airways 737-300, SX-BLC over the crash site on Monday 19/12.

    in reply to: Lack of aircraft hits Ryanair!! #600566
    Newforest
    Participant

    If you read the article it says the 732s are still going, but will have to be retired very shortly as they are nearing the end of their economic life with Ryanair. I assume they will be pushed until they reach their max number of cycles?

    Guess so, they have been sold to a parts recovery company in the U.S. 🙂

    in reply to: Air Nauru's only 737 reposessed #600576
    Newforest
    Participant

    That certainly is a great shame.
    One can only hope that the governments of the affected nations are doing what they can to resolve the situation.

    Let us hope so. ATDB record Air Tungaru and Air Nauru as ‘extinct’ 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 7,831 through 7,845 (of 8,156 total)