Oh Lord. That is beyond horrific. Simply dreadful.
Cripes ! That is a pretty hairy crash on the launch ! ‘ slight injuries’ amazingly..
”In August 1922 the Daily Mail newspaper offered a £1,000 prize for the longest duration flight by an unpowered, heavier than air aircraft. The competition was to be organized by the Royal Aero Club, who chose the site (Itford Hill, on the Sussex Downs near Lewes and the date (16–21 October). This gave competitors six weeks to design, build and transport their entries. Thirteen machines arrived in time and one of these was the Merriam glider, competition number 18.
The Merriam glider was designed, built and flown by Frederick Warren Merriam. He built it in one of the sheds belonging to S E Saunders at Cowes , where Newman was works manager. The latter took a close interest in the glider and came to Itford with it; it is sometimes referred to as the Merriam-Newman glider.
It was an all-wood aircraft, parasol Though several of the Itford contenders used thick aerofoils the Merriam used the thin RAF 15 section and its wing required external wire bracing. A pair of Flying wires on each side ran from a central, four strut pylon above the wing central section and three more pairs ran from the lower fuselage to the wing undersides. The wing had constant chord and blunt wing tips, with aileronswhich reached the tips and extended aft a little beyond the wing trailing edge.
The glider had a deep, rectangular cross-section fuselage, straight edged and roughly rhomboidal in profile. The underside sloped up rearwards, with an ll moving tailplane hinged at its extremity. fin and rudder had a cropped parallelogram form, sloping up to allow clearance between rudder and elevator. The single open cockpit was ahead of the wing. Twin wheels were attached outside the fuselage, assisted by a tailskid.
Merriam and Newman arrived at Itford late on Saturday 14 October, the first of two pre-competition practice days. A competitive flight on the Monday was called off when the wind dropped. It was launched the following day and crashed immediately. Though Merriam was only slightly hurt, his glider was too damaged to continue.
After repair the Merriam went to the Whitley Bank School of gliding, set up by Merriam on the Isle of Wight where it was converted into a dual control two seater.I n 1930 it was with the Isle of Wight Gliding Club, but there is no evidence that it was flown by this club”
She flies ! Today.
Photo by George Land
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=660446968774693&set=pcb.6604470087…
Link should work for fb users, and maybe others.
Nice film, visually very good quality. He seemed to be having a bit of a bad heir day, during the walk-round.
Interesting to hear from the breathless commentary that the Regal Beagle would soon be converted to jet power !
There are a number of knee-jerk naysayers here who opine on subjects of which they seem to have little knowledge.
There have been extensive and very encouraging discussions with the CAA, and the prospect of Sea Harriers returning to flight in UK skies is very much ‘live’.
For sale.
Hurricane £750
Sindlinger Hurricane 5/8th replicas (2off). 1 off restoration project, 1 off part new build. For sale due to bereavement. £750 the pair, build 1 from 2? Contact 07749 739 007
Sindlinger Hurricane (2off) for sale (afors.com)
That looks like a lot of good stuff for just £750. At that price would make a garden play thing, but probably deserves better.
image 7, Sindlinger Hurricane (2off) for sale (afors.com)
That’s quite a shot. They fly low, round your parts…
Another shot circulated today , photo by Dan Maber
A study in evolution. And once the engine is running, you can’t count the blades…
Sywell, first flight still pending.
Strange – the first link works for me. Just tried it.
Maybe you need to be a registered fb user.
I was disappointed that they elected to dipose of it. There was a time when a whole run of their displays seems to be curtailed by strong winds, and of course more rugged aircraft can carry on where the flimsy ones are grounded.
Their 30’s light aircraft are great, of course, but visitors really take notice when the fighters perform, and the Wildcat would have been great to see.
Sorry, not sure I can add much. I have no first-hand knowledge of the company, just an understanding of the nature of their business, where they are, and that they did fabricate these two B-17s .
Maybe contact them direct, for more info ?
Many thanks. Correction applied.
In recent times, a number of ‘ independent’ You Tube channels ( USA based ) have come to prominence, with the self-appointed remit of examining flying accidents, and the laudable aim of helping to identify causes, thereby promoting flight safety. As would be expected, such DIY analysis is not altogether welcome within the formal agencies charged with this task.
However, the individuals fronting these main YT Channels have a credible background as professional flyers, and their insight should not be dismissed out of hand, and indeed some recent examinations into ‘Probable Cause’ have uncovered very troubling repeating factors in a sequence of similar accidents which the NTSB has entirely ignored. The NTSB is coming into the spotlight, and need to answer a lot of questions about the nature of their investigations.
Juan Brown (see link) is one of a number of observers who idenity GLOC ( G induced loss of consciousness) as the likely cause, BUT, as he outlines here, evidence just emerging suggests an aileron departed the airframe soon after a high-G turn.
L-29 Crash Reno National Championship Air Races 18 Sept 2022 – YouTube
.
Posted on fb
”As many of you will have already seen, XM655 suffered a runway excursion earlier today during our trial run for the event which was planned for Sunday 18th. That event has been cancelled, all ticket holders have been informed by email and full refunds have been processed via Eventbrite. As far as we can see, the aircraft is largely undamaged, but in addition to the ongoing recovery work, we also have a lot of inspection work to carry out before we can consider any further live activity.
In an attempt to reduce uninformed speculation, we will explain what happened. After satisfactorily completing low speed steering and braking tests on runway 05/23, the aircraft was taken onto runway 18/36 for a trial high speed run. Due to a malfunction of a piece of equipment in the cockpit, the aircraft remained at full power for approximately two seconds longer than intended. This resulted in excessive speed and less distance in which to stop, and the aircraft passed beyond the end of the runway on to the agricultural area, stopping just before the airfield perimeter. The failed equipment was an air speed indicator which had been tested and found satisfactory six days ago, and which started working normally before the end of the run. The aircraft brakes worked properly but were unable to bring things to a halt within the reduced space available.
We will provide further updates when XM655 has been recovered and we have had chance to assess any damage.”